StudyCorgi Environment

The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management

Project Objectives

Project definition

The Nuclear International Development Association (NIDA) proposes a nuclear conference to discuss the future of nuclear energy in light of the recent disasters in Japan. The objective of the project is to reassure the world that despite the risks, nuclear power remains viable.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

The fit of the project to strategic intent

The proposed conference on the future of nuclear power seeks to bring together experts in nuclear technology. They will discuss the implications of the Japanese disaster on the future of civilian nuclear development. After the Japanese disaster, no country feels safe since Japan has one of the best nuclear safety standards in the world.

Key Business Drivers

NIDA feels the need to organize this conference urgently to provide a platform for the experts to determine quickly and coherently the implications of the crisis. NIDA should reassure the world that nuclear power is still viable. Despite the challenges, NIDA is convinced that the energy source of the future is nuclear power.

The fit of Project in meeting efficacy targets

By bringing together nuclear experts at a time like this when nuclear safety is everyone’s concern, NIDA will have an opportunity to highlight the benefits of nuclear power to the world. The conference will command the respect of governments and intergovernmental agencies. Its outcome will provide a basis for the discussion of the future of nuclear energy.

Project costs and benefits Sought

Key cost items

The key cost items for the project are as follows.

Item Justification
Conference facilities Plenary halls and seminar rooms required to host the presentation of papers
Accommodation Provision of accommodation for conference speakers and participants
Travel expenses Air travel for conference speakers from all over the world
Media and Publicity To publicize conference and to disseminate conference proceedings

Benefit realization

Several benefits will accrue from the conference. NIDA will receive fees from participants to run the conference and sponsors to support it. The conference proceeds will provide a net return to NIDA. Secondly, NIDA’s profile will rise in the nuclear energy industry as a promoter of nuclear power for development. The third benefit, which NIDA feels will be a “long-range benefit” and the most important one, is that NIDA will give the world a reason to continue having faith in nuclear power as a sustainable energy source (Maromonte, 1998, p.7).

Sensitivities in the benefit realization

If NIDA does not attract enough experts to the conference, the costs incurred in the preparation will be a waste. It will also fall into disrepute. Also, the failure of the conference will worsen global nuclear pessimism.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

Project components

Project description- scope

The scope of the conference spans civilian nuclear safety and its future. The context for the discussion is the Japanese disaster. It seeks to address the issue of nuclear safety from a global standpoint. The conference will not tackle nuclear proliferation or military uses of nuclear power. It will only look at nuclear safety concerns in civilian installations.

Key technical considerations

The key technical considerations for the conference include the logistical requirements, mobilization, information, and fundraising. Logistical requirements cover travel and accommodation. Information handling includes all communication to potential participants and the dissemination of conference materials thereafter. These include experts from all branches of nuclear technology and interested parties. Fundraising for the conference concludes the list of technical requirements.

Project duration-key stages

Preconference period
  1. Call for papers
This will involve inviting experts in various fields of nuclear technology to produce conference papers
  1. Registration
Invitations for individual and group participants, and subsequent registration to attend the conference
Conference period Conference event The conference sessions
Post-conference Dissemination of conference proceeding This includes sending out the materials gathered during the conference to decision making and opinion-shaping institutions as well as the general public

Project governance

Project delivery structure/authority – reporting lines

The conference will have a secretariat in the host city. There will be four executive officials in charge of planning committees.

Official Duties

  1. Conference director To chair the conference planning committee
  2. Media Liaison To ensure timely release of all advertisements and press releases for the conference
  3. Logistics manager In Charge of all international and local travel, and hotel bookings
  4. Rapporteur To capture all-conference proceeding for dissemination

External stakeholder management

NIDA external stakeholders include the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), and European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and national governments. Liaison with the external stakeholders will take place under the direction of the secretariat

Internal stakeholder management

The internal stakeholders include corporate and individual members of NIDA, for them, they will be contacted and advised by the internal channels. This includes regular email updates and event listing on NIDA’s website. All other matters relating to them fall under normal organizational arrangements

Project risk strategies

Identification of project risks

RISK TYPE Impact Probability of occurrence
Schedule Late response by experts to submit abstracts High Medium
Late bookings of conference facilities medium low
Late registration by participants medium Medium
scope Insufficient interest among experts High Very low
Inclusion of content beyond the scope of the conference High Medium
Resource Lack of sponsors for the conference High Medium
Unavailability of conference venues Low Low
      1. Very low
      2. Low
      3. Medium
      4. High
      5. Very high

Risk identification and tracking

In the project risk matrix above, the three most serious risks would be a late response by experts when asked to submit abstracts, Inclusion of content beyond the scope of the conference and lack of sponsors for the conference. These three risks will remain under careful observation by the conference planning committee to ensure they do not derail the planning process. It is important to note that some of the risks are the result of “external forces are outside the control of anyone in the organization” (Robinson & Robinson, 2005, p.14).

Risk mitigation

For the three major risks identified, the following mitigation strategies apply

We will write a custom
for you!
Get your first paper with
15% OFF
Learn More

Late response by experts

Mitigation measure: Avoidance

Ensure by personal follow-up through phone calls and emails that participating experts deliver abstracts on time.

Inclusion of content beyond scope by experts

Mitigation measure: Avoidance

Again, ensure experts get thorough briefs, not just on what to include, but also on what to exclude.

Lack of sponsors

Mitigation measure: Share

Seek co-hosts for the conference such that if there is a loss to incur, then it becomes a shared loss.


Identification of how to determine if the direct financial benefits have been achieved

The determination of the net income from the project will be the difference between the revenue to the conference less the expenses. The revenue stream for the conference will come from sponsorships and registration fees. The expenditure will include allowances paid to conference facilitators, fees paid for conference facilities, insurance, and transport costs. Other costs include correspondence costs and information dissemination. The difference between these two totals will be the net income to NIDA.

Identification of how to determine if indirect benefits have been achieved

Indirect benefits will not be as obvious as the financial benefits. This is because the conference aims at reducing the level of tension that the Japanese nuclear disasters have caused. The tension may cause a reduction in the number of new nuclear plants that are due for construction. It may also lead to an unnecessary tightening of approval procedures for the construction of nuclear plants.

Need a
100% original paper
written from scratch

by professional
specifically for you?
308 certified writers online
Learn More

The key indicators as to whether the conference is successful will be the degree to which it reduces or eliminates unnecessary fear the Japanese incidents have caused. Studies conducted to determine whether construction schedules of planned nuclear plants are on track or not will provide the means to measure this outcome. NIDA will also monitor legislation and regulatory changes governing the use of nuclear power

Key success indicators

Project performance assessment

For the actual conference, the performance assessment will include the number of experts who present papers at the conference, the number of institutional participants, governments, and regulatory bodies who attend the conference. Other measures to determine the success of the conference will be the number of participants who attend the conference, and the depth of discussion that the experts generate on the conference theme.

Project outcome

There are short-term and long-term outcomes envisaged by this project. The short-term results of the project include a change of attitude among conference participants, reduction in international anxiety over the use of nuclear power and the setting up of a benchmark for nuclear safety. The long-term result expected is a sustained increase in the number of nuclear plants the world over.

The mechanism for capturing lessons learnt

The rapporteur will be the main agent for capturing the debate elicited by the presentations of the expert. He will capture the sentiments together with subcommittee members to provide the conference with a “coherent sense of direction” (Wall, 2004, p.4). Away from the conference, different studies commissioned by NIDA will determine the long-term lessons and influence the conference will have over nuclear safety.

Reference list

Maromonte, K.R., (1998). Corporate Strategy Business Sourcing. Westport, CT. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

Robinson, D.G. & Robinson, J.C., (2005). Strategic Business Partner: A Critical Role for Human Resource Professionals. San Fransisco, CA: Berret-Koehler publishers Inc.

Wall, S.J., (2004). On the Fly: Executing Strategy in a Changing World. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style


StudyCorgi. (2020, December 4). The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management. Retrieved from

Work Cited

"The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management." StudyCorgi, 4 Dec. 2020,

1. StudyCorgi. "The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management." December 4, 2020.


StudyCorgi. "The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management." December 4, 2020.


StudyCorgi. 2020. "The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management." December 4, 2020.


StudyCorgi. (2020) 'The Future of Nuclear Power: Conference Management'. 4 December.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!