Introduction
Face time refers to being physically present during regular business hours, whereas telecommuting allows workers to work from home or other locations. This research aims to investigate the tremendous and negative impacts of face time and telecommuting on people and companies and to develop solutions to strike a balance between the two. Telecommuting has grown in popularity due to technological advancements and changes in work culture, allowing individuals to work from home or other locations. Over-reliance on FaceTime can have a negative impact on both productivity and well-being.
Discussion
One of the primary problems with FaceTime is that being present does not imply being efficient. While FaceTime may appear to be a quick and easy way to connect, the reality is that it frequently results in additional interruptions and diversions. The phone can easily become distracted by notifications, emails, or other chores that require attention (Vanderloo, et al., 2020). This can reduce productivity because you are not totally engaged in the task at hand. Furthermore, FaceTime calls frequently lack the personal touch of face-to-face interaction. While video conferencing technology has advanced significantly, it still cannot match the intricacies of face-to-face conversation. Facial expressions, body language, and other subtle clues are frequently misunderstood or misconstrued, resulting in misunderstandings and communication breakdowns.
One downside of telecommuting is the risk of social isolation. Employees who work from home or other remote locations may miss out on the social connection and sense of community that comes with working. This may result in feelings of isolation and loneliness, which can be harmful to an employee’s mental health and well-being (Shufford et al., 2021). Weather and transportation disruptions can also make telecommuting difficult. Employees may be forced to work from home if they can not come to work due to weather or transportation issues.
It is critical to remember that physical engagement is necessary for our mental health and beneficial to our entire health. Physical touch has been shown in studies to release endorphins, which aid in relieving stress and improve our mood (Shufford et al., 2021). Hugs, handshakes, and other types of physical touch are therefore crucial for human connection and should not be supplanted by digital communication. Using technology exclusively can lead to feelings of loneliness and isolation, which can severely impact our mental health, highlighting the need for in-person interaction. Physical interaction can play an important role in the development and maintenance of social bonds. Body language and facial emotions, for example, may help us better understand and connect with individuals during in-person conversations. This can lead to a deeper sense of trust and intimacy, both necessary for developing strong and meaningful partnerships.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is critical to consider both job requirements and employee demands when determining the best mix of face time and telecommuting. Specific professional responsibilities may need more in-person interaction in order to effectively cooperate and communicate with others, whilst others may be better suited for telecommuting. Furthermore, individual employees may have various demands and preferences for their work environment, such as the need for social contact or a quiet workstation.
References
Shufford, K. N et al., (2021). Connected while apart: Associations between social distancing, computer-mediated communication frequency, and positive affect during the early phases of COVID-19. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 2906–2920. Web.
Vanderloo, L. M et al., (2020). Applying harm reduction principles to address screen time in young children amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 41(5), 335–336. Web.