Basic Knowledge of the Book
The Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle is a major guiding force in academic and political ethics, which is a fundamental factor for human existence. The book is based on the author’s views and is subject to constructive and negative criticism from its intended audience. From my point of view, the book is an excellent resource for my understanding and appreciation of theoretical knowledge of the rhetoric and philosophy of communication. Firstly, I have learned that the main goal of ethics is achieving good as the end or means of getting whatever one needs. In this regard, my understanding of how I should approach or communicate with others, irrespective of the setup, has been nurtured. Secondly, my approach to asking rhetoric questions is far better than before I read the book. I have improved my ability to ask and answer questions philosophically and knowledgeably. Thirdly, I have gained a better and reliable understanding of ethics and the general code of social code of conduct. In a nutshell, I have realized that ethics is not just about the code of conduct, but it also entails one’s expectations and means of achieving happiness. As a result, I believe I am better placed in making decisions concerning my ethics and happiness.
Metaphor and Argument
The book is focused on the best ways of achieving happiness ethically. The book employs metaphors in an argumentative way, helping pass the author’s message to the audience more clearly. First, the grouping of chapters into books shows how the author is determined to help the readers consume the message in a clear, straightforward, and easy way. Besides, the author presents some contradicting arguments but explains them to clear any chances of doubt or double speaking. For instance, chapter six of the Justice Book argues that it is possible to act unjustly without being unjust. The author gives two examples in which such scenarios are possible: one in which a man commits adultery and another in a case where a man commits theft (Ameriks and Desmond). Although such activities are unjust, the persons committing them might not necessarily be defined as such. In this case, justice is presented as a metaphor to indicate fairness for all. However, the aforementioned scenarios contradict it, challenging most people’s ability to argue or debate about them. Unless such incidents are evaluated critically, most people may be subjected to undue punishment. The writing style helps the writer compel readers into critical thinking, resulting in better understanding and the ability to argue on real-life issues.
Relevance of the Book
As mentioned earlier, the book is an eye-opener to anyone seeking to understand the value and ways of achieving happiness in an ethical manner. It is a great work and expands on the general understanding and misunderstanding of ethics and happiness. The book is broken down into distinct sections addressing different aspects of ethics and happiness. In its structure, the book creates an ideal room for the target audience to gain as much as possible from its contents. The chapters are grouped into different subsections, focusing on related issues. For instance, the first section of the book is called “The End” and is comprised of thirteen chapters, all addressing related issues. Other sections are also arranged in a similar manner to help readers grasp the contents easily. The pattern is essential in real life in that it can be used to help students identify related topics and address them as a batch. The book structure is also applicable in the marketplace in that it can help investors and readers gain happiness and rightfully. Just as the book chapters are grouped, human behavior and characters can be grouped together for better clarification and understanding. Instead of embracing dubious means that comprise their integrity, they champion approaches that lead them to their goals in simple and actionable strategies.
Work Cited
Ameriks, Karl, and Desmond M. Clarke. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2000.