Print Сite this

The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity

Concerning the discussion posted on analysis of validity, acquiring, and defining truth on the pragmatic theory of truth, criticism on William James’ pragmatic theory can be deduced. The theory holds that a belief or claim can be classified as true if it works. However, critiques of this theory assert that there is no validity in categorizing truth as what works since not all works are true (Foreman, 2020). To determine the validity of a belief and its workability, one should discern its utility value. This is in line with whether the belief is successful in its effects or whether it leads to the production of desirable outcomes upon which it can be said to be true.

Our experts can deliver a customized essay
tailored to your instructions
for only $13.00 $11.05/page
308 qualified specialists online
Learn more

Based on the example given on the comparison between Buddhism and Christianity beliefs, the Buddhists hold a belief that Buddha teaches against belief in God or gods as it is not relevant for spiritual liberation. In contrast, Christians hold a belief and commitment to God as the sole source for their spiritual liberation. According to Groothuis (2013), these beliefs are upheld as incidentally accurate to each concerned denomination based on their successful outcomes and teaches made to acquire the beliefs. However, practical problems hold that Buddhism teachings and practices are different from those of Christianity since only one of the two beliefs is the truth.

Despite Buddha and Christ existing years back, the question on the hypotheses of the two beliefs is a factor considered in determining whether the beliefs are true. Pragmatically, the Buddha belief and the Christians’ beliefs are true as believers tend to achieve their desired effects (Capps, 2019). However, pragmatism theory problems assert that the validity of these two beliefs is null as they lack correspondence. Therefore, the pragmatic perspective of validating, acquiring, and defining truth as per the pragmatic theory problems is on the basis that what is considered true then produces successful outcomes when it works.

References

Capps, J. (2019). The Pragmatic Theory of Truth

Dew Jr, J. K., & Foreman, M. W. (2020). How do we know? An introduction to epistemology. InterVarsity Press.

Douglas Groothuis. (2013). “Some problems with Pragmatism” bethinking. Org

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, January 3). The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, January 3). The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity. https://studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/

Work Cited

"The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity." StudyCorgi, 3 Jan. 2023, studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

1. StudyCorgi. "The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity." January 3, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity." January 3, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity." January 3, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/the-pragmatic-theory-of-truth-in-buddhism-and-christianity/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'The Pragmatic Theory of Truth in Buddhism and Christianity'. 3 January.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.