Introduction
Transitional justice alludes to the procedures and systems in place to resolve human rights violations and other offenses perpetrated during unrest or tyranny. Transitional justice seeks to establish some degree of responsibility for historical atrocities while encouraging harmony and healing in cultures that have undergone violence and repression (Celermajer et al., 2020). In the framework of transitional justice, the essence of justice is diverse. It entails not only holding those culpable for previous misdeeds liable but also addressing victims’ needs and encouraging mending and reconciliation in impacted areas.
Discussion
In this view, justice can take various forms, such as retaliatory, rehabilitative, and reparative justice. For example, retributive justice keeps culprits answerable through criminal prosecutions and penalties. This approach is critical in sending a powerful signal that such activities will not be accepted and deter future human rights violations (Celermajer et al., 2020). Restorative justice, on the other hand, prioritizes victims’ interests and encourages mending and reconciliation through tools like truth and reconciliation councils and conventional justice agencies. Reparative justice entails giving victims compensation, remedies, and other forms of assistance.
It is critical to consider the population’s specific environment while establishing the most appropriate sort of justice. For example, retributive justice may be more beneficial in countries with a tradition of accountability and a well-functioning legal system (MacIntyre, 2020). Restorative justice may be more acceptable in societies where traditional justice procedures are more acknowledged and trusted. It is also critical to guarantee that the transitional justice process is fair and available to all, particularly marginalized communities (MacIntyre, 2020). This means that the viewpoints and interests of these communities should be considered, and they should be allowed to engage in the process.
Conclusion
To summarize, the essential sort of justice is comprehensive justice, which serves the interests of all parties concerned. This means that various types of justice, such as retributive, restorative, and reparative justice, should be evaluated and used as needed. Furthermore, the justice system must be inclusive, accessible, and victim-centred. These components are critical to ensuring that justice is not simply delivered but also recognized as being done.
Reference
Celermajer, D., Schlosberg, D., Rickards, L., Stewart-Harawira, M., Thaler, M., Tschakert, P., Verlie, B., & Winter, C. (2020). Multispecies justice: Theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 30(1-2), 119–140. Web.
MacIntyre, A. (2020). Whose justice? which rationality? The New Social Theory Reader, 130–137. Web.