Introduction
The article from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism focuses on high-risk drinking among college students. One independent variable identified in the article is “student characteristics,” which includes demographic factors such as age, gender, and ethnicity, as well as psychosocial variables such as stress, depression, and social support (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2005).
Discussion
The dependent variable in the article is “drinking behavior,” which is measured in terms of frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2005). The article’s findings underscore the importance of considering the complex interplay between student characteristics and drinking behavior to address high-risk drinking among college students effectively.
Based on these variables, a hypothesis can be formed as follows: College students with specific student characteristics (e.g., high levels of stress, low levels of social support) are more likely to engage in high-risk drinking behaviors (e.g., frequent and heavy alcohol consumption) than students without those characteristics. This hypothesis is supported by the findings of the article, which highlights the importance of considering student characteristics in understanding and addressing high-risk drinking among college students (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2005). Therefore, the article highlights the need for tailored interventions that consider individual student characteristics to reduce high-risk drinking among college students.
Technology
The field of law enforcement has undergone a significant transformation in recent years due to technological advancements. As per J.M. Pollock’s (2018) book “Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice,” the use of body cameras, drones, and predictive policing algorithms has significantly impacted the way law enforcement operates. Body cameras provide transparency and accountability in police interactions with the public, but they raise privacy concerns. Drones provide a bird’s-eye view of crime scenes and assist in high-risk situations, but they can be misused for surveillance purposes. Predictive policing algorithms can help prevent crime but perpetuate biases and discrimination.
Conclusion
New technologies in law enforcement have both positive and negative impacts, creating complex ethical dilemmas for the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies must strike a balance between utilizing the benefits of technology and protecting civil liberties. As Pollock (2018) mentions, “It is important for criminal justice professionals to continuously reflect on the ethical implications of the technology they use.” Responsible use of technology in law enforcement requires ongoing ethical reflection to ensure it advances justice and protects citizens’ rights.
References
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2005). High-risk drinking in college: What we know and what we need to learn [PDF Document]. Web.
Pollock, J. M. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.