“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright

What’s Wrong—and What’s Right—
with Stakeholder Management
What’s Wrong—and What’s Right—
with Stakeholder Management
What’s Wrong—and What’s Right—
with Stakeholder Management
What’s Wrong—and What’s Right—
with Stakeholder Management

In the article In What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management, John Boatright (2006) presents a stakeholder management concept that aims to balance the interests, benefits, and drawbacks of all stakeholders of the organization. There are two main points highlighted regarding the failure of such a concept. First is the idea that executives of the company are those who serve stakeholder interests the best. Second is the failure to encounter that a corporation serves all stakeholders’ interests, including external and internal ones that can influence the organization. Boatright advocates stakeholder management theory to be useful for the business’s ethical management and differentiates it from the stockholder management theory.

Corporate governance and the theory of management are two main themes the author introduces to discuss the stakeholder theory to present his views. To support the stakeholder concept with the management theory, Boatright (2006) states that each stakeholder group can get benefits when being involved and considered in the corporation. The statement leads to the shareholders’ dependence on the performance of different stakeholder groups, which suggests the necessity of all groups to collaborate. Boatright underlines that when executives of the company work closely with stakeholders, they exchange moral issues and ethical information with stakeholders and empower them to be viewed as shareholders. The stakeholder management concept aims to promote cooperation among groups and help them understand various views on the corporation’s operations.

Nevertheless, the view of the author might have some issues that should be highlighted. The stakeholder management theory considers all external and internal stakeholders’ needs and interests that can be on different sides of the business and can oppose each other, which is the corporate managers’ problem. Executive primarily serves the interests of stockholders that have specific views on the corporation that cannot align with stakeholders’ needs that might lead to ineffective decisions.

From the point of corporate governance, an organization must maximize profit for stockholders or shareholders. Boatright (2006) claims that pursuing such a strategy is not a reliable option because the maximization of profit goal only serves one group but not other stakeholder groups that a corporation consists of. In this situation, the company does not consider other groups that contribute their efforts to the organization’s development and might not be satisfied with the corporate governance approach to managing needs and expectations. It is assumed that executives who cannot build strong relationships among all groups will not achieve excellent performance for the company. However, here it should also be mentioned that the company’s executives should not overlook financial KPIs to ensure that individual interests do not prevail over others and do not harm the company’s goals to expand with the help of financial values.

To summarize Boatright’s vision on stakeholder management, it can be said that there are points that define the concept and evaluate the positive and negative sides of the idea. Stakeholder management is helpful when it comes to building objectives and balancing between various stakeholders’ needs and interests. The problem with the stakeholder management concept lies in the fact that it is not an obligatory theory that executives should apply to achieve results for stockholders of the organization. Therefore, it is crucial to focus the company’s efforts on long-term objectives and take into account the interests of different people that help the company grow and develop further.

References

Boatright, J. (2006). What’s wrong— and what’s right — with stakeholder management. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2). Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, March 24). “What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright. https://studycorgi.com/whats-wrong-and-whats-right-with-stakeholder-management-by-boatright/

Work Cited

"“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright." StudyCorgi, 24 Mar. 2022, studycorgi.com/whats-wrong-and-whats-right-with-stakeholder-management-by-boatright/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) '“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright'. 24 March.

1. StudyCorgi. "“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright." March 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/whats-wrong-and-whats-right-with-stakeholder-management-by-boatright/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright." March 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/whats-wrong-and-whats-right-with-stakeholder-management-by-boatright/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "“What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright." March 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/whats-wrong-and-whats-right-with-stakeholder-management-by-boatright/.

This paper, ““What’s Wrong – and What’s Right – with Stakeholder Management” by Boatright”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.