Over the decades, the central economic policy that contributed to the significant growth index in America has been capitalism. The approach enshrines the personal ownership of property and wealth hence imposing the importance of business competition for optimal profitability margin (Johnson, 1997). The concept rendered a proficient effect to the marginalization of poor communities from the elite social group. However, the American government encountered the challenge due to the philosophy after the Second World War. The core reason for the problem involved the demand for togetherness and cooperation among all stakeholders in rebuilding the country for better living conditions (Asselin, 2018). The aftermath of World War II attributed to the justification of communism and the spread across the highly affected nations globally and a trickle-down effect to the U.S.
Stalin is considered one of the historic mass murderers due to his policies implemented in Russia. The leader considered the ultimate solution of resistance as terror. The first approach to promote development engulfed the exploitation of collectivism among small-scale farmers. Although the agricultural worker fostered optimal produce, Stalin imposed socialism as the solution in elevating productivity among the kulak (Rozenas & Zhukov, 2019). Nevertheless, the statesman geared the use of violence among the peasants to agree and amalgamate farmlands. The use of intimidation and fear is a high cost that led to the loss of Russian lives to enhance economic development and supremacy on a global scale.
As a political leader, Stalin spearheaded communism in Russia, and the transition incurred a high cost of Russian lives. Between 1933 and 1934, the country experienced famine, and at least four million residents died due to hunger (Rozenas & Zhukov, 2019). The idealist argued that despite the decline in productivity, economic development was a prominent issue over the lives of the workers and the peasants. In this case, Stalin emerged as one of the greatest mass murderers because of his vision to lead the nation to greatness through industrialization. Apart from the famine that led to the deaths of inhabitants and laborers, the use of terror as the primary motivational element caused a significant loss of lives.
Stalin led the Russian economy to communism based on strict policies that cost a significant percentage of workers’ and peasants’ lives. The politician and idealist focused on empowering the nation to avoid being colonized by other developed countries. As a result, Stalin enhanced industrialization based on the essence of boosting communism and economic competence globally (Asselin, 2018). However, the initiative negatively affected the residents and mainly the peasants. The lucrative impact of the concept nurtured its widespread adoption across different nations as a reconstructive philosophy to the negative effect of World War II.
Communism significantly affected the U.S economic growth and development due to the interplay of dynamic values. As a capitalist, the American government faced a profound problem after the Second World War caused by the demand for labor and resources to reconstruct the socio-economic system (Johnson, 1997). However, other nations utilized bolshevism to establish the efficient rebuilding of the structures despite gender and ethnic disparity. It is contrary to America’s philosophy on private ownership of factors of production alleviating the inherent challenges of dependence and poverty. After the combat, tension intensified between the U.S and Russia due to the distinct economic frameworks. It is an initiative that attributed the emergence of the Vietnam conflict and other South American nations with the American administration regarding adopting Russia’s perspective (Johnson, 1997). In the short run, socialism was a necessity to enhance the unity and cooperation among the residents. Nevertheless, in the long run, it was a threat to the enterprise profitability of a state. As a result, the American government focused on enhancing a proficient influential value across a broader scope of the global realms, elevating commercialism.
World War II contributed to a significant loss of American lives and the destruction of property. Apart from the damage, the government prompted investing in weaponry to win the combat hence compromising the economic growth and development index. Researchers argue that capitalism leads to competition despite the adverse effect on the population (Johnson, 1997). It is one of the factors that contributed to the conflicts as a means of profitability at the expense of the soldiers’ lives and the parsimony’s performance outlier. The primary responsibility of all stakeholders encompasses enhancing the advancement of standards to justify the framework and the interdependent variables. In this case, the mainframe attributed to a dynamic impact towards the burgeoning contrary to Russia’s recovery in the short run due to the coordinative efforts.
In conclusion, America faced a profound challenge after the Second World War due to the proficient spread of communism against the preferable capitalism philosophy. One of the consequences of the emergent social and economic issue involved the Vietnam conflict and the increased inflation rate. It is crucial to establish the integral approach of an effective recovery to alleviate the imminent problem. The loss of soldiers and property destruction derailed the aspect’s convalescence, highly influencing the trade relations and trickle-down effect of the accrual benefits.
References
Asselin, P. (2018). Vietnam’s American War: A history. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson. P. (1997). A history of the American people. Forbes Magazine. Web.
Rozenas, A., & Zhukov, Y. M. (2019). Mass repression and political loyalty: Evidence from Stalin’s ‘terror by hunger.’ American Political Science Review, 113(2), 569-583. Web.