Older individuals are urging a change in how society views and discusses ageing. Older people worldwide choose to concentrate on the opportunities presented by ageing rather than its restrictions. They are looking for strategies to enhance their physiological, mental, and social well-being to maintain their independence and activity as they age. A long, fulfilling life filled with purpose and good quality of life are the hallmarks of healthy ageing. According to research, older persons who practise healthy habits, seek preventive medical care and participate in their families, social networks, and communities are happier, healthier, and more independent.
Executive Summary
Because of significant improvements in public health, medicine, and healthcare access, humans are now living longer and in better health than ever before. In the US, the life expectancy is now 78.8 years, which is a record high (Kříž, 2017). Because of their longer lifespans, older Americans get more time to participate in the workforce, community service, and volunteer work. Older persons contribute to society in several ways, such as through paid jobs, volunteer work, or unpaid caregiving for loved ones. Nearly six in ten persons aged 75 and older and 8 out of 10 adults between the ages of 65 and 74 participate in at least a few of these activities (Lam et al., 2021). According to one study, older people provide more than $160 billion annually to America through volunteerism and unpaid family caregiving (Lam et al., 2021). Future generations have better opportunities thanks to older Americans’ knowledge, expertise, wisdom, and compassion.
One of the main goals of policymakers attempting to adjust national economies and welfare programs to the effects of population ageing has been to extend working life and increase employment levels among older age cohorts. When it comes to employing, contact to training programmes, age-appropriate working circumstances, and elasticity, many older workers experience challenges compared to prime working age. The age differences in employment rates show how often their potential and capacity are squandered due to lesser engagement in the labour market. This policy brief’s main topic is ageism, which is one of the obstacles to longer working lives.
Younger and older workers in the labour market encounter ageism, which is the stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination of persons based on their age. In times of economic distress, many older people have been forced into early retirement or encounter ageism when searching for a job, training opportunities, and career growth. Ageism in the workplace is pervasive and expensive for companies that do not boost the performance of their ageing staff. Ageism has been demonstrated to impact health and well-being at the individual level severely and can shorten life expectancy by up to 7.5 years (van der Horst & Vickerstaff, 2021). This impact on health necessitates collaboration between numerous stakeholder groups and specific policy initiatives at all levels. Since it takes time for deeply ingrained stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminatory practices to shift, the situation’s complexity needs to be addressed immediately.
Context and Importance of the Problem
Ageism in work is a complicated problem, and many participating countries have officially outlawed age discrimination and taken down many obstacles to longer functioning lives. Longer-term activities are required to influence how individuals feel, think, and act toward ageing. It is more challenging to change these soft types of ageism, which are present in attitudes, conversation, and working cultures. Organizations must address these issues to develop truly age-inclusive or age-diverse labour markets where everyone may reach their full potential during their working lifetimes.
Ageism permeates a wide range of societal institutions and fields, including those that provide health and social services, employment, the media, and the judicial system. Age-based healthcare rationing is a common practice in work areas. Age influenced who received particular medical interventions or treatments in 149 research, according to a systematic review published in 2020 (Ibarra et al., 2020). Adults of all ages frequently face disadvantages in the job, and exposure to specific education and training cuts markedly with age. Younger people’s speeches are often disregarded or denied in numerous contexts, including employment, well-being, housing, and politics, when ageism against them is manifested.
Ageism toward younger and older individuals is pervasive, goes unacknowledged, is unopposed, and has significant adverse effects on our economy and society. It has detrimental effects on human’s health on many levels. Age discrimination is related to worse overall health, more social isolation and segregation, more financial uncertainty, reduced quality of life, and premature death in older individuals. Ageism is a contributing factor in 6.3 million incidents of despair worldwide. It affects people’s health and well-being negatively because it overlaps with and worsens other types of prejudice and shortcoming, such as those associated to sex, race, and incapacity.
Societies lose billions of dollars due to ageism according to a study published in 2020. Age discrimination in the method of unfavorable age diversity and individual-perceptions increased the annual expenditures of the eight most significant affluent health diseases in the United States by an additional US$63 billion (Weiss & Zhang, 2020). Overall, Americans over 60 equate to $1 in every $7 consumed on these diseases over a year. Australian approximations indicate that if 5% more individuals 55 and older were hired, the national economy would be helped by AUD$48 billion annually (Weiss & Zhang, 2020). Ageism’s financial implications are poorly understood, and additional research must fully comprehend its economic impact, especially in low- and middle nations.
Several initiatives options are suggested in this policy brief to counteract ageism in the labour market. It is crucial to eliminate any remaining ageist language from legislative and regulatory regimes and to assist the execution of equality legislation by supportive measures to bring about long-lasting change. Among the suggested actions to combat prejudice and unfavourable perceptions about older workers are studies on ageism and recognition programs that debunk myths about older workers, enhance their image, and promote their significant contributions to the labour market. Promoting the advantages of age diversity and inclusivity in the workplace requires effort.
Age diversity can be supported by encouraging intergenerational interactions by implementing job-sharing and mentoring programs. Increased self-esteem, confidence, and employability among older workers and job searchers effectively combat internalized ageism. Employing age-management practices that are comprehensive, life-course focused, and employee-centred helps progress the creation of age-inclusive and age-diverse workplaces. Employer capacity-building initiatives and financial support can speed up transformation.
A firmer foundation for change may be established than individual employers’ actions through a partnership approach to combating ageism in the workplace that involves the social partners and a wide variety of labour market stakeholders. Ageism is a prevalent social issue that calls for action from all parties and fields. Everyone is impacted by ageism; age stereotypes in culture are something that even 4-year-olds are aware of this issue. From then on, they internalize these stereotypes and utilize them to control their attitudes and actions toward individuals of various ages. They similarly depend on on cultural age typecasts to distinguish and comprehend themselves, which might lead to self-directed age discernment at any age. Ageism intersects with and intensifies sexism, racism, and disability-related disadvantage.
Ageism permeates everything, including ourselves, relationships, and institutions. Ageism can be seen, for instance, in practices that restrict younger people’s ability to participate in workplace decision-making and in policies that help healthcare rationing based on age. It is also seen in patronizing actions used in relations with both young and older adults and in self-limiting conduct, which can result from ingrained prejudices about what an individual of a certain age can or cannot do. In Europe, the only area for which statistics are collected on all age brackets, younger individuals report experiencing more discriminatory practices than other age groups. Half of the world’s population is ageist toward older people.
Ageism has wide-ranging adverse effects on human health, lifespan, well-being, and the solidarity between generations. It can also negatively affect our ability to benefit from the contributions of younger and older people. For instance, ageism is linked to worse overall health, earlier mortality, and a worse recovery from disability as people age. Ageism also worsens our life quality by encouraging harmful health habits like smoking, binge drinking, and eating unhealthily. Ageism accounts for one out of every seven dollars in healthcare annually in the United States for the eight most costly conditions.
Ageism is harmful to both the young and the old. Yet, it is frequently so pervasive and accepted in institutions, policies, laws, and people’s attitudes that people fail to see how it violates their rights and dignity. Ageism must be actively fought against as a pervasive violation of human rights. Fighting ageism at work will help in creating age-inclusive and age-diverse workplaces that offer equivalent opportunity for all ages. Taking full advantage of the possibility of longevity will help enable long operating lives and the capacity to operate in the region’s ageing communities.
Critique of Policy Option
Ageism can be reduced or eliminated through three strategies: intergenerational interventions, educational initiatives, and legislative and legal measures. Policy and law can address age-based prejudice and inequality, and everyone’s human rights are protected everywhere. By presenting correct facts and anti-stereotypical cases, educational activities can improve compassion, eliminate myths about numerous age groups, and lessen prejudgment. Intergroup bias and stereotypes can be reduced by intergenerational interventions that bring people from multiple generations together.
Age discrimination is lessened through legislation and regulations that address it, educational initiatives that foster empathy and dispel myths, and intergenerational initiatives that reduce prejudice. All nations and investors are urged to adopt factual-based tactics, enhance data gathering and research, and team up to make a movement that will renovate how humans see ageing and change how they behave toward it. These evidence-based tactics will help drive the UN Century of Healthy Aging forward.
There are now many definitions of ageism that are more or less ambiguous, which characterizes ageism research. Numerous researchers without a detailed description of the problem look at ageism’s causes and effects. The topic is characterized by diverse study findings that are challenging to re-test and compare. As a result, finding a framework for ageism is challenging. For people, families, communities, and politicians alike, the ageing population’s rapid growth in the 80+ age bracket poses serious concerns. In the setting of both demographic shifts and financial constraints, it is imperative to find creative and long-lasting solutions to assist older people in continuing to live at home independently (Hoens & Smetcoren, 2021). As each person’s innate capability and living circumstances interact to determine their functional ability, reaching late old age manifests differently for each person. Supporting such variability in advanced age experiences calls for clever, integrated, and tailored technologies, which save resources for the service delivery system.
Policy Recommendations
Most policy measures for population ageing have been centred on adjusting social programs to the demands of demographic change. The prospects and potentials that prolonged life has for people, economies, and society as a whole, as well as overcoming the obstacles that currently prevent their full realization, are being given much less attention. If longevity is primarily seen as a financial burden and a barrier to economic growth, this may lead to policies that worsen inequality. This inequality might happen if the cumulative disadvantages of challenging life transitions, lousy health and disability, and unpaid caring are not well handled. Additionally, it contributes to prejudice against older persons and age-based prejudices.
The contexts in which ageism may occur, as well as the unique characteristics of a particular culture, economic cycle, or degree of political will, must be considered when developing policies. However, policies must also incorporate the framework of the global economies, sectors, and businesses. Legal changes, initiatives addressing prejudice and derogatory perceptions of and by older employees, and incentives for companies to eliminate ageism from management strategies and workplace cultures are some of the instruments at the disposal of politicians in the fight against ageism. To alter this, it is crucial to enable individuals to lead active, satisfying lives as they age and to understand the possibilities of ageing societies better. In addition to providing workers with protection and the chance to defend their privileges, legislation is crucial because it symbolizes society’s rejection of age discrimination. Equal rights or anti-discrimination laws describe direct and indirect discrimination and discuss many potential justifications for indirect forms of abuse, harassment, and discrimination.
All parties involved must work together to combat ageism. Governments can speed up the procedure by establishing and fostering platforms where alliances amongst representatives of employers, employees, and other stakeholders can be selected for simpler policymaking and knowledge sharing. Such platforms advance the strategic plan for non-discrimination by establishing a common objective for partners that may have to a certain extent, competing interests. Non-discrimination benefits businesses in terms of greater output, the calibre and longevity of the hires they may make, their reputation as an employer, and client pleasure.
Organizations should, for instance, form alliances with various groups, such as the Business in the Society Business Network, the Conciliation and Arbitration Service, the Hiring and Selection Confederation, and employer organizations to assist in spur change. To promote the advantages of hiring older workers, the government, these organizations, and various events and goods, including an educational video, should collaborate to create awareness and support good practice. In numerous industries, collective agreements handling age-management concerns should be reached, and the Federal Department of Labor and Public Affairs should encourage best practices among businesses.
Other policy recommendations call for the elimination of ageist clauses from the legislative and regulatory framework, the enforcement of equality statutes, and raising awareness of the rights of employees and the resources available to those who have experienced age discrimination. Organizations can combat prejudice and unfavourable stereotypes about older employees by researching ageism and launching awareness-raising initiatives that debunk these stereotypes. They can also enhance older workers’ reputations, highlight their valuable contributions to the labour force, and highlight the advantages of age inclusion and diversity. This can lead to fostering intergenerational relationships through coaching and job-sharing programs, addressing ingrained ageism by enhancing confidence and self-esteem, and more. Another recommendation is to promote age-inclusive and age-diverse environments by offering financial incentives to businesses, building age management skills, and cultivating partnerships with key stakeholders to enable more substantial and sustainable change.
References
Hoens, S., & Smetcoren, A. (2021). Hiring live-in migrant care workers: Motivations and experiences of older people and their families. Journal of Population Ageing. Web.
Ibarra, F., Baez, M., Cernuzzi, L., & Casati, F. (2020). A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: Loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020, 1-14. Web.
Kříž, J. (2017). Life expectancy in the 65 years old population and pensions income. Hygiena, 62(4), 108-111. Web.
Lam, A., Yeung, D., & Chung, E. (2021). Benefits of volunteerism for middle-aged and older adults: Comparisons between types of volunteering activities. Ageing and Society, 1-20. Web.
Van der Horst, M., & Vickerstaff, S. (2021). Is part of ageism actually ableism? Ageing and Society, 1-12. Web.
Weiss, D., & Zhang, X. (2020). Multiple sources of aging attitudes: Perceptions of age groups and generations from adolescence to old age across China, Germany, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(6), 407-423. Web.