Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency

I have examined the websites of Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia – the three leading companies in the transparency index. Their contribution is undoubtedly admirable; however, in my view, the most remarkable report was made by Patagonia. Since Hart (2019) mentions that this brand was included in the index for the first time, it becomes clear that the company made a lot of progress within just one year. Additionally, Patagonia’s website provides the most information in its sustainability section: it demonstrates its environmental approaches, social programs, and supply chain reports. Also, the presented data is very extensive; under the slogan «know how your clothes are made» (Patagonia, 2021), customers can find the exact factory where each item is produced and how the company supports people who work there. Overall, Patagonia launched more than 15 sustainability programs covering almost every step of its production and retail processes. Although Adidas’s and Reebok’s contributions are undeniably valuable, I believe Patagonia presents the most transparency to their customers so that everyone can ensure they uphold their social responsibilities.

Regarding the point that «lack of transparency costs lives», I can agree that this refers to the workers in the first place. When companies conceal some of their manufacturing processes, it often signals that the factories have unsuitable or even dangerous conditions. One of the most striking examples was discussed is Kashyap’s (2019) article: in 2013, the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh collapsed and killed nearly 1500 workers. This event alone proves that transparency is essential in order to control and sustain safety in factories. Brands that do not pay due attention to their social responsibilities may put their employees at risk, and this behavior needs to be fairly judged.

References

Hart, C. (2019). Sportswear brands lead the way on transparency. Supply Management. Web.

Kashyap, A. (2019). Transparency is in fashion: Reward brands that are telling consumers where, how and by whom their products are made. New York Daily News. Web.

Patagonia. (n.d.). Environmental & Social Footprint. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, October 17). Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency. https://studycorgi.com/adidas-reebok-and-patagonia-brands-transparency/

Work Cited

"Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency." StudyCorgi, 17 Oct. 2022, studycorgi.com/adidas-reebok-and-patagonia-brands-transparency/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency'. 17 October.

1. StudyCorgi. "Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency." October 17, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/adidas-reebok-and-patagonia-brands-transparency/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency." October 17, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/adidas-reebok-and-patagonia-brands-transparency/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency." October 17, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/adidas-reebok-and-patagonia-brands-transparency/.

This paper, “Adidas, Reebok, and Patagonia Brands’ Transparency”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.