Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination

LGBTQ discrimination is the unfair treatment of people who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. This discrimination can take many forms, including verbal abuse, physical violence, and exclusion from social events or services (Farr and Goldberg 370). There are several instances that have occurred, thus calling for the LGBTQ discrimination fight. Some of these cases include the reports on the challenges faced by LGBTQ persons and the lack of support from the Trump administration. In addition, the LGBTQ has become popular and has attracted many members; thus, their contribution or suffering greatly impacts society (Olson and Reddy-Best 255). Numerous concerns have led to the fight against prejudice against LGBTQ individuals, and the fight is important because these people also contribute to society and deserve to be treated with respect and dignity.

Numerous reports of LGBTQ discrimination have surfaced in the past year. The past year has seen an uptick in reports of LGBTQ intolerance, making this an ideal time to advocate against such injustices. This is especially true given that the LGBTQ community has made considerable progress in recent years in terms of visibility and acceptance (Opall 12). Discrimination against the LGBTQ community persists in many forms, from employment intolerance to hate crimes. While some may argue that such injustice is a matter of personal choice or opinion, the reality is that it can have rather real and harmful consequences (Ghabrial 47). Studies have shown that LGBT people who experience discrimination are more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems (McCann and Brown 3393). They are also at increased risk for substance abuse and generalized anxiety disorder.

Additionally, Trump showed little interest in protecting the rights of LGBTQ people. Trump administration officials actively worked to roll back progress made on LGBTQ rights in recent years. For example, the administration proposed a religious freedom rule that would allow healthcare providers to discriminate against LGBTQ patients and has implemented a transgender military ban (Sonfield 50). Similarly, the Trump administration announced that they erased transgender civil rights protections in health care, making it easier for doctors to refuse treatment to patients based on their gender identity. This is a clear attack on the LGBTQ community and an attempt to strip away the hard-fought rights that have been won over many years (Haynes 385). Therefore, with all of this going on, now is definitely the time to stand up and fight against discrimination against LGBTQ people.

Similarly, the increased visibility of LGBTQ people and growing acceptance of LGBT rights globally has made it the right time to argue against LGBTQ discrimination. First, the visibility of LGBTQ people has increased dramatically in recent years (Stone e12638). This is due in part to the growing acceptance of LGBTQ people, which has allowed more people to feel comfortable coming out. As a result, many high-profile individuals are openly joining LGBTQ, including celebrities, politicians, and business leaders. Second, there is growing evidence that discrimination against LGBTQ people is harmful to both LGBTQ individuals and society as a whole. A number of studies have shown that LGBT individuals who experience discrimination are at an increased risk of committing suicide (Woulfe and Goodman 100). When the society loses its members who pay development tax, regardless of their affiliation, the country’s economic status declines.

Indeed, there is no question that discrimination against the LGBTQ community is wrong and must be addressed. Given the growing acceptance of LGBT rights internationally, now is the time to advocate against LGBTQ discrimination (Bishin et al. 1018). As many countries are recognizing the rights of LGBTQ people, it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify discrimination against them. In addition, businesses are beginning to see the value in inclusive workplace policies, and consumers are voting with their dollars in favor of companies that support equality (Cyrus 197). Ultimately, discrimination against LGBTQ people is bad for businesses growth. LGBTQ people are important in promoting businesses because they are a large and growing consumer segment with significant spending power. Similarly, they are more likely than the general population to support businesses that share their values.

On the other hand, arguing against LGBTQ discrimination is important to people today due to two main reasons. First, it is because every person deserves to be treated with respect and equality. Respect and equality are basic human rights that everyone deserves, including LGBTQ people (Ekmekci 337). Unfortunately, they often face discrimination and mistreatment because of their personalities in the societies. Everyone should be treated with respect regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity (Ekmekci 336). LGBTQ people are like everyone else; they want to love and to be adored, have families and friends, and pursue their dreams. They should be able to do all of this without fear of discrimination or violence, but sadly, this is not always the case which is wrong and needs to change. Beyond that, there are many specific reasons why LGBTQ people deserve to be treated with fairness and equality (Lee et al. 718). For example, LGBTQ people contribute in countless ways to society, often working in occupations that are vital to the functioning of community, but they do not receive much recognition.

Second, it is important to the people today because discrimination against LGBTQ people has negative consequences for society as a whole. When any group is marginalized and treated unfairly, it creates an environment in which that group is less able to contribute to society (Cundiff et al. 752). This is because they are forced to spend time and energy fighting for their rights rather than focusing on their work or families. Furthermore, discrimination against LGBTQ people also breeds hatred and intolerance (Bilewicz and Soral 31). This hate can lead to violence and hate crimes against members of the LGBTQ community. When bigotry is allowed to flourish, it destroys the fabric of society and creates an unsafe environment for everyone. Thus, it is crucial to stand together to oppose discrimination and promote equality for all.

In conclusion, when it comes to the civil rights of LGBTQ people, the time has come to advocate for an end of discrimination in all forms. This includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as sex and gender stereotyping, and this is essential in a few ways. First and foremost, every person deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, no matter who they are in society. Second, LGBTQ people face greater levels of discrimination than other groups in many areas of life, including in employment, housing, education, and healthcare. Additionally, Trump’s administration has done little to eradicate discrimination against LGBTQ people. In fact, the administration has taken steps to legitimize and legalize discrimination against LGBTQ people. Therefore, people must stand up against bigotry and hatred and fight for a society that is inclusive and welcoming to everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. The argument against LGBTQ people is important because they are human beings who contribute to national development and are also prone to stress and depression; thus need to be treated with respect and dignity.

Works Cited

Bilewicz, Michał, and Wiktor Soral. “Hate Speech Epidemic: The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization.” Political Psychology, 2020.

Bishin, Benjamin G., Justin Freebourn, and Paul Teten. “The Power of Equality? Polarization and Collective Mis-Representation On Gay Rights in Congress, 1989–2019.” Political Research Quarterly, 2021.

Cundiff, Jessica L., Sohee Ryuk, and Katie Cech. “Identity-Safe or Threatening? Perceptions of Women-Targeted Diversity Initiatives.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2018.

Cyrus, Kali. “Multiple Minorities as Multiply Marginalized: Applying the Minority Stress Theory to LGBTQ People Of Color.” Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 2017.

Ekmekci, Perihan Elif. “Do We Have a Moral Responsibility to Compensate for Vulnerable Groups? A Discussion on the Right to Health for LGBT People.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2017.

Farr, Rachel H., and Abbie E. Goldberg. “Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Adoption Law.” Family Court Review, 2018.

Ghabrial, Monica A. “Trying to Figure Out Where We Belong”: Narratives of Racialized Sexual Minorities on Community, Identity, Discrimination, and Health.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2017.

Haynes, Jeffrey. “Trump and the Politics of International Religious Freedom.” Religions, 2020.

Lee, David, Morgen Johansen, and Kwang Bin Bae. “Organizational Justice and The Inclusion of LGBT Federal Employees: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis Using Coarsened Exact Matching.” Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2021.

McCann, Edward, and Michael John Brown. “The Mental Health Needs and Concerns of Older People Who Identify as LGBTQ+: A Narrative Review of the International Evidence.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2019.

Olson, Eric D., and Kelly Reddy-Best. “Pre-Topsurgery, the Body Scanning Machine Would Most Likely Error:” Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Travel and Tourism Experiences.” Tourism Management, 2019.

Opall, Brent S. “Motives in Creating an LGBTQ Inclusive Work Environment: A Case Study.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2021.

Sonfield, Adam. “Trump Administration Rules Prioritize Refusal of Care and Conservative Ideology Over Protecting Patients Against Discrimination.” Guttmacher Policy Review, 2019.

Stone, Amy L. “The Geography of Research on LGBTQ Life: Why Sociologists Should Study the South, Rural Queers, and Ordinary Cities.” Sociology Compass, 2018.

Woulfe, Julie M., and Lisa A. Goodman. “Weaponized Oppression: Identity Abuse and Mental Health in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community.” Psychology of Violence,  2020.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, June 5). Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination. https://studycorgi.com/argument-against-lgbtq-discrimination/

Work Cited

"Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination." StudyCorgi, 5 June 2023, studycorgi.com/argument-against-lgbtq-discrimination/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination'. 5 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination." June 5, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/argument-against-lgbtq-discrimination/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination." June 5, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/argument-against-lgbtq-discrimination/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination." June 5, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/argument-against-lgbtq-discrimination/.

This paper, “Argument Against LGBTQ Discrimination”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.