Introduction
Assistive technologies are tools, devices, or equipment that help people with disabilities perform daily tasks more easily. They have diverse applications, such as in the education sector, improving communications, aiding social interactions, rehabilitation engineering, and increasing functional abilities (Al-Hendawi et al., 2023; DiGiovine et al., 2023). Although assistive technologies have varying levels of reach worldwide, their diversity makes them available to large populations, and efforts continue to enhance their reach.
Thesis
In an increasingly interconnected world where technology continues to advance with each passing day, integrating assistive care for people with disabilities is not just a viable solution but a necessity. This move, as previous studies have shown, is likely to increase convenience, inclusivity, and empowerment across diverse groups, including those residing in lower-income regions (Karki et al., 2023). This study shows that widespread adoption of assistive technology for people with disabilities not only removes potential barriers and limitations for the directly affected population but also changes how they interact with others and their environment.
Ethical Dilemmas
Adopting assistive technology for people with disabilities is not easy and is influenced by various ethical dilemmas. One of the ethical dilemmas associated with the technology is its ease of accessibility vs its affordability. A study by Rasouli et al. (2023) showed that participants lacked self-confidence in the technology, believing that it is expensive and inaccessible, which is true for the technologies. This facet results in marginalization, with people from low-income backgrounds not being able to afford them.
An example of this would be a visually impaired student from a low-income family who wishes to use a screen reader to access educational materials. The student comes from a low-income background and cannot afford the reader, which raises an ethical dilemma. This problem can be addressed using the utilitarian ethical theory, which seeks to maximize an individual’s overall well-being. In this context, it would be appropriate to make the technology affordable for the population, thus maximizing happiness for the greatest number of people.
Another key ethical dilemma related to this technology is the trade-off between privacy and data security for users. Assistive technology solutions usually rely on collecting large volumes of user data and processing it to develop tailored solutions and recommendations. However, the storage of this personal data raises questions, as in the past, there have been high incidents of privacy infringements, data breaches, and misuse. These violate ethical principles for assistive technologies, including self-determination, non-harm, privacy, and sustainability (Schicktanz et al., 2023).
A case example of this would be a speech recognition platform that stores personal voices to enhance accuracy and functionality. However, due to storage limitations, this provider stores the voices in third-party databases, creating privacy risks such as unauthorized access. The ethical theory principle of autonomy can be used to address this moral dilemma. The speech recognition platform must thus respect the client’s decisions, ask for their permission, and inform them of potential vulnerabilities before storing their data in third-party databases.
While assistive technologies allow people with disabilities to enjoy greater autonomy, there is a risk of becoming overly dependent on them. This aspect would undermine the user’s self-reliance, leaving them unable to function when the technology is unavailable. Studies show that while smart technologies are helpful, there is less time for customization and training, resulting in over-reliance (Ding & Morris, 2023). An example of this dilemma is an older adult who relies on voice-assisted technologies in a smart home system for basic activities, such as turning on lights.
Over time, the elderly individual may become accustomed to the technology so that, should a breakdown occur, they can perform basic functions independently. The ethical theory that can be used to address this moral dilemma is the ethics of care, specifically the principle of care. The technology should be designed to support people with disabilities without taking away their independence or ability to do things for themselves.
Recommendations
To address the ethical dilemma of equity of access vs. affordability, subsidy programs should be implemented to make this technology affordable and available to all people, regardless of their economic backgrounds. It is also necessary that assistive technologies for people with disabilities be made open source, thus being accessible to all individuals at a cost-effective price. This objective can be achieved by providing technology builders with grants and financing, thereby enabling them to become non-profit institutions. The problem is currently being addressed by international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF, although other stakeholders can still do more (Simeon et al., 2023; Smith et al., 2024). Stakeholders to ensure this include governments, non-profit organizations, developers of assistive technologies, and insurance providers.
Regarding the privacy vs. data security ethical dilemma, it is important to ensure that providers incorporate privacy-enhancing features, such as encryption and anonymization strategies, from the outset. Additionally, governments should govern providers to ensure they adhere to data governance policies and comply with established regulations. It is also essential to provide users with education and ensure they understand the importance and best practices for safeguarding their personal data when using these technologies (McNicholl et al., 2021). To address this ethical dilemma, the stakeholders involved include assistive technology companies, regulatory bodies, privacy advocates, and educational institutions.
To address the dilemma of dependency vs. autonomy, it is important to provide users with holistic support to build their confidence in their ability to handle basic tasks. It would also be essential to conduct workshops with occupational therapists, industrial designers, and end users with physical impairments to learn how the technology is to be used (Aflatoony et al., 2023). The technologies should also meet accessibility standards and universal design principles to ensure they are customizable and promote user autonomy. Stakeholders critical to addressing this ethical dilemma include rehabilitation centers, educational institutions, and organizations developing standardized technologies.
Conclusions
Assistive technologies have a wide array of applications with deep reach across many groups and regions worldwide. However, their use is faced with various ethical dilemmas, such as accessibility vs affordability, privacy vs data security, and dependency vs autonomy. It is recommended that subsidies be provided to make the technology affordable and reach all people, including those from low-income regions.
The makers of these solutions should also incorporate features such as encryption and anonymization to ensure data security. Education and customization need to be incorporated into best practices for technology use to prevent over-dependency. Future studies on this topic should focus on assistive technology in relation to social justice issues, as this area remains underexplored.
References
Aflatoony, L., Lee, S. J., & Sanford, J. (2023). Collective making: Co-designing 3D printed assistive technologies with occupational therapists, designers, and end-users. Assistive Technology, 35(2), 153–162.
Al-Hendawi, M., Hussein, E., Al Ghafri, B., & Bulut, S. (2023). A scoping review of studies on assistive technology interventions and their impact on individuals with autism spectrum disorder in Arab Countries. Children, 10(11).
DiGiovine, C. P., Donahue, M., Bahr, P., Bresler, M., Klaesner, J., Pagadala, R., Burkhardt, B., & Grott, R. (2023). Rehabilitation engineers, technologists, and technicians: Vital members of the assistive technology team. Assistive Technology, 35(1), 23-34.
Ding, D., & Morris, L. (2023). Provider perspectives on providing mainstream smart home technologies as assistive technology. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits (ATOB), 17, 43–56.
Karki, J., Rushton, S., Bhattarai, S., & De Witte, L. (2023). Access to assistive technology for persons with disabilities: A critical review from Nepal, India and Bangladesh. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(1), 8-16.
McNicholl, A., Casey, H., Desmond, D., & Gallagher, P. (2021). The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2), 130–143.
Rasouli, O., Kvam, L., Husby, V. S., Røstad, M., & Witsø, A. E. (2023). Understanding the possibilities and limitations of assistive technology in health and welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities, staff perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(7), 989-997.
Schicktanz, S., Welsch, J., Schweda, M., Hein, A., & Rieger, J. W. (2023). AI-assisted ethics? Considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies. Frontiers in Genetics, 14.
Simeoni, R., Pirrera, A., Meli, P., & Giansanti, D. (2023). Promoting universal, equitable accessibility: An overview on the impact of assistive technology in the UN, UNICEF, and WHO web portals. Healthcare, 11, 21, 2904.
Smith, E. M., Huff, S., Wescott, H., Daniel, R., Ebuenyi, I. D., O’Donnell, J., & MacLachlan, M. (2024). Assistive technologies are central to the realization of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(2), 486–491.