Print Сite this

Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment

Abstract

The early discovery, classification, and treatment of neurophysiological conditions are vital clinical bolster errands for medical specialists in tweaking quiet treatment projects to better deal with the advancement and the movement of these maladies. Endeavours are being made to analyse these neurodegenerative issues before its complications. For sure, early finding helps patients to get effective treatment advantage before critical mental decrease happens. Brain stimulation development was noted in the examination enthusiasm for EEG, as the full examination of neuro-dynamic time-touchy biomarker that aids in distinguishing cortical variations from the norm related neurophysiological disorders. An EEG marker would be a noninvasive technique that may have the affectability to recognise neurophysiological conditions early and even characterise the level of its seriousness at a lower cost for mass screening. EEG is accessible and speedier to use than other imaging gadgets. Thus, we analysed different mythologies in collective brain signals. This survey has concentrated on utilising EEG as a researching apparatus and physiological biomarker to distinguish neurophysiological disorders and arrange the level of its seriousness by flag preparing and examination. The survey is intended to uncover unobtrusive changes that may characterise markers for the early recognition that will help restorative specialists and clinicians in arranging and giving a more dependable expectation of the course of the infection notwithstanding the ideal remedial program to give patients extra years of a higher personal satisfaction.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Introduction

A developing assemblage of proof proposes that EEG examinations, including resting state related incitement conventions, might be valuable in the advancement of Biomarkers for various neurological issues and vary from the norm (Baird, Smallwood, Lutz, & Schooler, 2014). Neurophysiological conditions are infections of the mind, spine, and the nerves that associate them (Blennow, de Leon, & Zetterberg, 2006). There are more than 700 illnesses of the sensory system, for example, mind tumours, epilepsy, Parkinson’s malady, stroke, and additionally less commonplace ones, for example, dementia (Boksem, Meijman, & Lorist, 2005). Neurophysiological disorders are maladies of the focus and fringe sensory system (Cedazo-Minguez, & Winblad, 2010).

The points of disorders include the cerebrum, spinal line, cranial nerves, fringe nerves, nerve roots, autonomic anxious framework, neuromuscular intersection, and muscles (Coyle, Price, & DeLong, 1983). Thus, this paper will examine techniques in brain stimulation. By implication, we will evaluate alternative methodologies for the monitoring and stimulation of transient EEG biomarkers for a number of neurophysiological conditions (deBettencourt, Cohen, Lee, Norman, & Turk-Browne, 2015). Criticism control of profound cerebrum incitement (DBS) in Parkinson’s sickness has incredible potential to enhance viability, lessen symptoms, and decline the cost of treatment. Thus, the planning and power of incitement are titrated by biomarkers that catch current clinical state. Incitement might be of standard high recurrence or wisely designed to alter particular neurotic rhythms (DeKosky, & Marek, 2003). The scan and approval of suitable input signals are critical to neurophysiological conditions. The signals recorded from the DBS anode presently have all the earmarks of being the most encouraging wellspring of input (Gorelick, 1997).

The scan for neural biomarkers of execution remains a test in development science. The non-obtrusive nature of high-thickness electroencephalography (EEG) recording has made it a most encouraging road for giving quantitative criticism to specialists (Hart, Schmidet, Klein-Harmeyer, & Einhauser, 2013). Implication, we will audit the present importance of the principal sorts of EEG motions with a specific goal to follow a viewpoint for future common sense uses of EEG and occasional related possibilities (Hughes, Berg, & Danziger, 1982). Current clinical parameters utilised for analysis and phenotypic meanings of psychopathology are both exceptionally factor and subjective (Jackson, & Snyder, 2008). While biomarker inquirer in neurophysiological disorders has concentrated largely on practical neuroimaging techniques for distinguishing the neural capacities that connect with psychopathology, scalp electroencephalography (EEG) has been seen, generally, as offering minimal particular cerebrum source data, as scalp appearance just inexactly corresponds to its cerebrum source elements (Jeong, 2004).

In any case, continuous advances in motion preparing of EEG information can now convey useful EEG mind imaging with unmistakably enhanced spatial and fine tenacity. An alternative technique in monitoring non-evasive brain stimulation is called an independent component examination (ICE). ICE deterioration can be used to recognise unmistakable cortical source exercises that are delicate and particularly to the pathophysiology of neurophysiological conditions. Given its useful research points of interest, moderately easy, and convenience, EEG imaging is presently both attainable and alluring, specifically for studies, including the expansive tests required by hereditarily enlightening plans to describe causal pathways to psychopathology (Jeong, Chae, Kim, & Han, 2001). The very non-obtrusive nature of EEG information procurement, coupled with progressing propels in dry, remote, and wearable EEG innovation, makes EEG imaging progressively alluring and proper for psychiatric research, including the investigation of formatively youthful specimens (John, Prichep, Fridman, & Easton, 1988).

Connected to substantial, hereditarily and formatively instructive specimens, EEG imaging can propel the look for vigorous analytic biomarkers and phenotypes in neurophysiological conditions. Profound cerebral stimulation (DBS) has been in routine clinical use for over 12 years and gives an exceedingly profitable treatment methodology for patients with Parkinson’s malady (PD) in the administration of uncontrolled engine indications. DBS fundamentally enhance engine control, and enhance personal satisfaction over best restorative treatment. As a neurophysiological biomarker, EEG can portray diverse physiological and neurotic conditions, for example, dementia impacts on cortical capacity dispersion. EEG could be utilised as a clinical finding apparatus, as well as a device for foreseeing the phases of dementia (Kam et al., 2010). Various reviews have been directed to manage EEG changes related to dementia and to recognise the level of seriousness of dementia, and a few reviews bolster the likelihood for EEG to distinguish dementia in the early stages. They demonstrated the likelihood of utilising EEG as a marker for AD (Kam, & Handy, 2013). EEG may assume an essential part in recognising and ordering dementia because of its critical impact on the dementia variance from the norm as far as beat movement (Klimesch, 1999). EEG is helpful for clinical assessment because of its convenience, non-invasiveness, and ability to separate forms and seriousness of dementia at a cost lower than that of other neuroimaging methods (Kovacevic, & McIntosh, 2007).

Traumatic cerebrum harm (TBI) remains the fundamental driver of handicap and an open medical noteworthy issue around the world. This survey concentrates on the neurophysiology of TBI, the basis and current condition of proof of clinical use of brain stimulation to advance TBI recuperation, especially on cognizance, intellectual capacity, engine impedances, and psychiatric conditions. We talk about the instruments of various brain stimulations systems including major noninvasive and intrusive incitements. Up to this point, most noninvasive cerebrum incitement mediations have been non-targeted and centred on the perpetual period of recuperation after TBI. In the intense stages, there is restricted proof of the viability and wellbeing of cerebrum incitement to enhance practical results. Looking at the reviews crosswise over various procedures, transcranial coordinate stimulation is the intercession that right now has the highest number of legitimately composed clinical trials, however adding to the number is still less. We perceive the requirement for bigger reviews with a target neuroplasticity tweak to investigate the advantages of cerebrum incitement to influence TBI recuperation amid various phases of recuperation.

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

Research Aims

The aim of the research focuses on alternative methodologies in monitoring and stimulating transient EEG in neurophysiological disorders. By implication, alternative measures will support nurses and caregivers to provide precise and effective treatment.

Secondly, the research evaluates these methodologies to ascertain cost efficient and easy source of data retrieval for patients with neurophysiological conditions. Thirdly, the research will assist caregivers to improve the quality of life in patients with neurophysiological disorders.

Literature Review

This section examines previous literatures on brain stimulation and neurophysiological disorders. Trevisan Adrian, Cavallari Paolo, and Attard Frederick (2013), investigated the feedback therapy for patients with autism disorder. The authors studied children with autism spectrum conditions (ASD). The literature recommended that kids determined to have ASD have diverse cerebrum action levels when contrasted with ordinary youngsters. As a result, the authors tested 50 kids (27 determined to have ASD and 23 controls samples) inferred that youngsters with ASD have larger amounts of δ waves among different variations from the norm which bolster the lopsidedness of neural excitation in an autistic cerebrum. Neurofeedback has now been utilised for quite a long in research, clinical trials and as treatment for a few conditions and psychiatric disorders. Thus, neurofeedback makes utilisation of the client’s EEG assembled information to adjust the neurophysiological and neurological framework for a number of neurological based issues (Lal, & Craig, 2001). The study turned out to be useful for various neurological conditions. The authors revealed that tests performed on patients determined to have ASD demonstrated that enhancements in social conduct and electrophysiological conduct are gotten in some cases.

However, similar research on Sonified therapy suggested that neurofeedback has no or little impact in treating ASD (Luu et al., 2001). As a prelude to the examination of acquired outcomes, a general presentation of the two-channel EEG gadget headband and the BMS was displayed (Maillet, & Rajah, 2016). The two-channel EEG gadget headband is a convenient two cathode EEG flags obtaining gadget that utilises an altered form of the low determination cerebrum electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) to get assessments of subcortical action (Maillet, & Schacter, 2016). This gadget can interface with a PC by means of Bluetooth to such an extent that it can be interfaced to the BMS application running on a similar machine. The BMS is a product application that uses Sonified Neurofeedback to change the EEG signals acquired from the headband into Sonified signals. The result demonstrated an important δ wave concealment plainly showing that kids subjected to this review made huge advances in overseeing side effects related to ASD. This was affirmed by criticism from the guardians of the individual subjects. Consequently, the research was consistent with previous literatures on brain music system (McVeigh, & Passmore, 2006).

Another literature by Trevisan Adrian and Jones Lewis (2011) examined an institutionalised restorative treatment utilising the Brain Music System, a framework that uses Sonified neurofeedback precisely and cost adequately to change brainwaves into a melodic sound utilising Digital Signal handling calculations. The researchers performed a standard course of Sonified neurofeedback treatment (for instance 15 sessions), custom-made particularly for patients experiencing various neurological conditions. Autism Spectrum Disorder is a reasonable plausibility due to the modest and convenient nature of the framework, and could be utilised both inside and even outside a customary clinical setting for subjects enduring from a wide exhibit of mental and neurological conditions. In the pilot study to test the calculations and yield of the Brain Music System, the dispersion of the Alpha, Beta, and Theta waves in ordinary subjects was consistent with reviews utilising standard top of the line gear (restricted to costly clinical setups). These outcomes permit the Brain Music System to adjust its convention to practice benchmarks, and to better relate standard algorithmic errands to each of the three brainwaves (Petersen, 2004).

Trevisan Adrian (2012) described music-production with manual action separated from the imaginative “cortical action” (for instance, playing the piano, or holding a guitar both needs the utilisation of hands). Clinical gear, for example, Electroencephalography (EEG), made biofeedback a probability for music-producers yet confined its utilisation to the couple of artists that could bear such a costly gadget. The paper portrayed a framework named “Mind Music System” which is a unique, reasonable, and capable framework that can produce melodic yields in light of data gathered through an EEG gathering gadget. The research was based on the architecture where distinctive recurrent groups trigger comparing piano notes and the multifaceted nature of the flag to the beat of the sound. The precision of the melodic change has been built up through exploratory work, where information about members of a pilot sample was accumulated and broken down with a specific goal to decide which melodic properties ought to be related to the right brainwave type. By implication, the result revealed its influence on individuals with manual inabilities in music production (Pond, 2012).

Trevisan Adrian and Jones Lewis (2010) investigated the low-end technique of EEG conversion. This examination gave a straightforward and compact framework that can produce MIDI yield based information gathered through an EEG gadget. The employments of such a gadget is useful in numerous ways, where the restorative impacts of tuning in to the music made by the cerebrum wave record many cases of treating medical issues. The approach is impacted by the interface several literatures where distinctive recurrent groups trigger comparing piano notes through and the intricacy of the flag speak to the beat of the sound. The correspondence of sound and the notes has been built up through test work, where information about members of a test gathering was accumulated and investigated, putting interims for mind frequencies for various notes.

We will write a custom
essays
specifically
for you!
Get your first paper with
15% OFF
Learn More

The review is a dynamic commitment to the field of the neurofeedback by giving criteria devices for evaluation. Feusner Jamie, Madsen Sarah, Moody Teena, Bohon Cara, Hembacher Emily, Bookheimer Susan, and Bystritsky Alexander (2012) investigated the influence of the effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation. The objective of the study was to describe the intense impacts of CES on the patient’s brain action. Consequently, the researchers speculated that CES would bring about deactivation in cortical and subcortical districts. Eleven sound samples were used for the experiment. The samples were given CES, connected to the ear cartilage at sub-sensory limits while being examined with utilitarian attractive reverberation imaging in the resting state. The result revealed that CES influenced cortical cerebrum deactivation, with a comparative example for high-and low-recurrence incitement, and adjusts network in the DMN. This impact is influenced by impedance from high-or low-recurrence commotion. Little agitations of mind motions may consequently affect ordinary resting state cerebrum action. These outcomes give understanding into the system of activity of CES, and may aid future improvement of ideal parameters for successful treatment.

Methodology

The proposed inquiry identifies alternative methodologies in the monitoring and stimulation of transient EEG biomarkers in neurophysiological conditions (Román, 2002). By implication, we will recognise, examine, and assess diverse methods of retrieving brain data using Non-intrusive and obtrusive therapies. We will recognise a biomarker, inward vacillations in consideration that can dependably foresee regardless of whether data will be held after some time. While earlier research has connected with times of inconsideration, regarding quick slips in performance (e.g., slower or less exact in-the-minute choices). We will distinguish a biomarker of absent-mindedness that predicts consequent passes in execution. The methodologies incorporate non-intrusive expectation framework for epilepsy, EEG sound textures for ASD patients, a cloud-based biological system, cranial electrotherapy incitement, Sonified neurofeedback to mention a few. We analyse the speculation blunders of different mixes of levels of a few variables: number of components, preparing a test estimate, natural variety, trial variety, impact size, replication, and the connection between elements.

Summary and Conclusion

Resent innovation, cross-examination in neuroimaging and other high-throughput advances has prompted to a blast of high-dimensional information requiring improvement of novel strategies or change of existing facts and machine-learning procedures to boost the data pick up from such information (Román, 2003). An expansion in the quantity of accessible techniques has consistently required strategy examinations, keeping in mind the goal to locate the best one in a specific circumstance bringing about various productions concentrating on similar reviews in the current bioinformatics and computational science writing (Ruitenberg, Ott, van Swieten, Hofman, & Breteler, 2001). A substantial assortment of such reviews has looked at administered measurable and machine strategies for subject grouping overwhelmingly in view of microarray quality expression or high-dimensional mass spectrometry information (Shou, & Ding, 2013). Thus, caregivers can effectively administer specific treatment during emergencies (Shou, Ding, & Dasari, 2012). As a result, nurses and caregivers can improve the quality of life using different brain stimulation techniques (Smallwood, Beach, Schooler, & Handy, 2008).

Previous literatures regarding brain stimulation in neurophysiological conditions have exposed the lack of bias, the absence of prejudice, utility and the routes a large portion of these correlations are executed as there is little accord between the discoveries of such reviews (Snyder, Hall, Cornwell, & Falk, 2011). The literatures show relative reviews to exhibit the predominance of a specific strategy for utilising datasets favouring the picked method. Due to the way that executive evaluations are liable to experimental fluctuation, the best execution in one or a couple occurrences does not infer so on a normal or a populace level. Neural changes related to neurophysiological disorders can distinguish with clinical biomarkers, for example, EEG, quantitative electroencephalography, the occasion related potential, transcranial attractive incitement, Non-invasive technique, Sonified neurofeedback and Vagus nerve incitement (Terry, & Buccafusco, 2003). EEG is a neurosignal that tracks data handling with millisecond accuracy. It has been subjected to translation by the clinician visual assessment that marks satisfactory and effective result (Willems, Hah, & Schulz, 2010). EEG biomarkers give high transient determination and it is consequently essential for examining mind movement (Wilson, & Russell, 2003). Thus, the translation of the level of EEG irregularity and seriousness of neurophysiological disorders is the advantages of flag handling and examination of EEG. EEG flag examination gives an exact confinement of electrical movement sources by following the various levelled availability of neurons in the recording place. EEG may provide a helpful sign of the examples of cerebrum movement if incorporated with different biomarkers, for example, basic and practical neuroimaging.

References

Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Lutz, A., & Schooler, W. (2014). The decoupled mind: Mind-wandering disrupts cortical phase locking to perceptual events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(4), 2596–2607.

Blennow, K., de Leon, M., & Zetterberg, H. (2006). Alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet, 368(9533), 387–403.

Boksem, A., Meijman, F., & Lorist, M. (2005). Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study. Cogn. Brain. Res, 25(1), 107–116.

Cedazo-Minguez, A., & Winblad, B. (2010). Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia: Clinical needs, limitations and future aspects. Experimental Gerontology, 45(1), 5–14.

Need a
100% original paper
written from scratch

by professional
specifically for you?
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Coyle, J., Price, D., & DeLong, M. (1983). Alzheimer’s disease: A disorder of cortical cholinergic innervation. Science, 219(4589), 1184–1190.

deBettencourt, M.T., Cohen, J.D., Lee, R.F., Norman, K.A, & Turk-Browne, B. (2015). Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 18(5), 470 – 475.

DeKosky, S., & Marek, K. (2003). Looking backward to move forward: Early detection of neurodegenerative disorders. Science, 302(5646), 830–834.

Feusner, J., Madsen, S., Moody, T., Bohon, C., Hembacher, E., Bookheimer, S., & Bystritsky, A. (2012). Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation on resting state brain activity. Brain Behav, 2(3), 211–220.

Gorelick, P. (1997). Status of risk factors for dementia associated with stroke. Stroke, 28(2), 459–463.

Hart, B.M., Schmidet., H.C., Klein-Harmeyer, I., & Einhauser, W. (2013). Attention in natural scenes: contrast affects rapid visual processing and fixations alike. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 6(1), 23-56.

Hughes, C., Berg, L., & Danziger, W. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 140(6), 566–572.

Jackson, C., & Snyder, P. (2008). Electroencephalography and event-related potentials as biomarkers of mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 4(1), S137–S143.

Jeong, J. (2004). EEG dynamics in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(7), 1490–1505.

Jeong, J., Chae, J., Kim, S., & Han, S. (2001). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 18(2), 58–67.

John, E., Prichep, L., Fridman, J., & Easton, P. (1988). Neurometrics: Computer-assisted differential diagnosis of brain dysfunctions. Science, 239(4836). 162–169.

Kam, J. W. Y., Dao, E., Farley, J., Fitzpatrick, K., Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W. (2010). Slow fluctuations in intentional control of sensory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 460–470.

Kam, J.W.Y., & Handy, T.C. (2013). The neurocognitive consequences of the wandering mind: A mechanistic account of sensory-motor decoupling. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(2), 725-730.

Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Res. Rev. 29(2), 169–195.

Kovacevic, N., & McIntosh, R. (2007). Groupwise independent component decomposition of EEG data and partial least square analysis. Neuroimage, 35(3), 1103–1112.

Lal, K., & Craig, A. (2001). A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue. Biol. Psychol. 55(3), 173–194.

Luu, P., Tucker, D., Englander, R., Lockfeld, A., Lutsep, H., & Oken, B. (2001). Localizing acute stroke-related EEG changes: Assessing the effects of spatial under sampling. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 18(4), 302–317.

Maillet, D. & Rajah, M. N. (2016). Assessing the neural correlates of task-unrelated thoughts during episodic encoding and their association with subsequent memory in young and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(1), 826-841.

Maillet, D. & Schacter, D.L. (2016). When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(3), 370-9.

McVeigh, C., & Passmore, P. (2006). Vascular dementia: prevention and treatment. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 1(3), 229–235.

Petersen, R. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256(3), 183–194.

Pond, D. (2012). Dementia an update on management. Australian Family Physician, 41(12), 936–939.

Román, G. (2002). Vascular dementia may be the most common form of dementia in the elderly. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 204(1), 7–10.

Román, G. (2003). Vascular dementia: distinguishing characteristics, treatment, and prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(5), S296–S304.

Ruitenberg, A., Ott, A., van Swieten, J., Hofman, A., & Breteler, M. (2001). Incidence of dementia: Does gender make a difference? Neurobiology of Aging, 22(4), 575–580.

Shou, G., & Ding, L. (2013). Ongoing EEG oscillatory dynamics suggesting evolution of mental fatigue in a color-word matching Stroop task. IEEE, 2(1). 15-112.

Shou, G., Ding, L., & Dasari, D. (2012). Probing neural activations from continuous EEG in a real-world task: time-frequency independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods, 209(1), 22–34.

Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2008). Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(2), 458–469.

Snyder, S., Hall, J., Cornwell, S., & Falk, J. (2011). Addition of EEG improves accuracy of a logistic model that uses neuropsychological and cardiovascular factors to identify dementia and MCI. Psychiatry Research, 186(2). 97–102.

Terry, A., & Buccafusco, J. (2003). The cholinergic hypothesis of age and Alzheimer’s disease-related cognitive deficits: recent challenges and their implications for novel drug development. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 306(3), 821–827.

Trevisan, A. (2012). Brain music system: Standardized brain music therapy. Audio Engineering Society, 1(2), 3-19.

Trevisan, A., & Jones, L. (2010). A low-end device to convert EEG waves to music. Audio Engineering Society, 5(1). 1-7.

Trevisan, A., & Jones, L. (2011). Brain music system: Brain music therapy based on real-time sonified brain signals. J Neurol Disord, 2(1), 23-78.

Trevisan, A., Cavallari, P., & Attard, F. (2013). A portable sonified neurofeedback therapy for autism spectrum disorder patients-an initial evaluation. J Neurol Disord, 1(4), 1-15.

Willems, B., Hah, S., & Schulz, K. (2010). En route data communications: Experimental human factors evaluation. Neurosci. Methods, 2(1), 45-56.

Wilson, F., & Russell, A. (2003). Operator functional state classification using multiple psychophysiological features in an air traffic control task. J. Ergon. Soc, 45(3), 381–389.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 22). Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 22). Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment. https://studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/

Work Cited

"Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment." StudyCorgi, 22 July 2022, studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

1. StudyCorgi. "Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment." July 22, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment." July 22, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment." July 22, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/brain-stimulation-in-neurophysiological-treatment/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Brain Stimulation in Neurophysiological Treatment'. 22 July.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.