Introduction
Sacramento has long suffered from California’s notoriously bad air quality. Wildfire smoke, industrial pollution, and transportation emissions contribute to some of the worst air quality in the country. Regarding short-term particle pollution, the American Lung Association lists Sacramento as the sixth most polluted city in the United States. The public’s health and the environment are negatively affected by poor air quality. Sacramento’s poor air quality has far-reaching effects on public health. Diseases of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems are among those made worse by subpar air quality. Exposure to air pollution is associated with an increased risk of adverse health effects, especially among the most vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and those with preexisting health conditions. Crop damage, animal suffering, and increased greenhouse gas emissions are some environmental costs of poor air quality. Sacramento’s poor air quality severely affects human health and the environment, so people must learn more about the factors that contribute to it.
Pro Side
The case for bettering Sacramento and California’s air quality is supported by the following six statements, all of which are backed up by evidence:
Sacramento’s and California’s overall lousy air quality has been linked to an uptick in respiratory ailments like asthma, bronchitis, and lung cancer. Particle pollution, which consists of microscopic particles from sources including wildfires and industrial pollutants, is associated with a higher probability of cardiovascular disease, lung cancer, and stroke. Another study indicated that death rates among California’s elderly were higher among those exposed to particle air pollution (California Air Resources Board [CARB], 2021). This is only one manner in which vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and people with low incomes, might be badly impacted by air pollution. The adverse effects of air pollution on human health are significant. Breathing dirty air can cause various health issues, including asthma, heart disease, stroke, and cancer of the lungs. Especially in children, air pollution is a leading cause of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Ramanathan, 2020). The effects of air pollution on health are especially severe for the elderly and those with preexisting medical issues. Air pollution is a significant contributor to global warming.
Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane contribute to global warming, affecting sea levels, weather patterns, and ecosystems in many ways. Particulate matter formed from air pollution absorbs and scatters solar energy, adding to atmospheric warming (Ramanathan, 2020). Air pollution harms biodiversity, affecting both plants and animals. Crops and forests can be harmed by air pollution, as can ecosystems and their wildlife inhabitants. Acid rain, a byproduct of air pollution, significantly contributes to soil erosion and the breakdown of artificial structures.
Poor air quality in Sacramento and the rest of California is mainly attributable to air pollution from vehicles and factories [CARB], 2021). In addition, emissions from vehicles and factories were found to be the state’s two most significant contributors to air pollution [CARB], 2021). This lines up with the data showing that pollution from cars and factories is a significant factor in Sacramento and the surrounding area’s poor air quality. About 40% of California’s greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change and exacerbate air pollution issues, are produced by the transportation sector alone (California Environmental Protection Agency [CEPA, 2021). Therefore, it is evident that controlling these emissions is crucial to enhancing Sacramento and California’s air quality.
Better air quality and public health can result from more substantial limits on emissions from industry and transportation [CEPA], 2021).
In California, low-income and minority communities are disproportionately hit by the adverse effects of poor air quality, further widening existing health gaps [CEPA], 2021). Communities of color and the economically disadvantaged in California are disproportionately represented in areas with high air pollution, such as near major freeways and industrial facilities. These effects on health can increase healthcare costs and lower quality of life, further widening the gap between the health of low-income and minority communities and that of more affluent communities (Ramanathan, 2020). Adverse effects on economic opportunities and social inequities are compounded when poor air quality causes people to miss work or school. The reduction in healthcare costs and the increase in productivity could be a result of better air quality.
Cleaner air can be achieved with less reliance on fossil fuels if investments are made in renewable energy sources like wind and solar power.
These statements present a compelling argument for improving the air quality in Sacramento and California. They do so by drawing attention to the adverse effects of poor air quality on people’s health and the potential economic benefits that could result from investing in renewable energy and stricter emission regulations.
Counter Arguments
Although there are valid concerns about the potential economic impacts and effectiveness of stricter regulations on emissions, there are also counterarguments suggesting that the air quality in Sacramento and California has improved in recent years due to the voluntary efforts of the industry and technological advancements and that other factors such as wildfires, natural dust, and pollen also contribute to air pollution:
- Economic consequences, such as job losses and higher expenses for enterprises, may result from harsher laws being imposed on industrial and transportation emissions. The California Chamber of Commerce (CCC, 2021) warns that excessive regulation could hurt the state’s economy by making businesses less competitive and raising consumer prices.
- There may be no need for more rules now that the air quality in Sacramento and the rest of California has improved thanks to voluntary industry efforts and technology breakthroughs. Industry initiatives and technology developments have resulted in significant improvements in air quality, and more laws may not be necessary to accomplish further improvement.
- Air pollution in Sacramento/California, is caused by more than only industrial and transportation emissions; for example, wildfires and natural dust and pollen also add to the problem. Wildfires and naturally occurring dust and pollen are also contributors to poor air quality, as noted by (CARB, 2021), in addition to industrial and traffic emissions.
- Implementing new restrictions may take time and money, and those changes may not immediately improve air quality. (CEPA, 2021) warns that new laws may need time and resources to be fully implemented and that the resulting improvement in air quality may only be noticeable immediately after a certain point.
- Not all businesses or people can afford long-term investments in renewable energy sources. While renewable energy sources like wind and solar power might help improve air quality, the initial investment in these technologies may be prohibitive for some businesses and individuals.
- Improving air quality in Sacramento/California, may not be the most immediate issue requiring cash and resources, as there may be other health and environmental priority. Other health and environmental challenges may require more immediate attention and money than improving air quality.
Position Statement
Stricter limits on industrial and transportation emissions are necessary to enhance the air quality in Sacramento/California, as evidenced by the pro and con sections. Asthma, bronchitis, and lung cancer are just some respiratory ailments related to the area’s poor air quality [CARB], 2021). These adverse effects exacerbate health inequities, primarily affecting low-income and minority groups. Hence, stricter limits on emissions are required to lower air pollution levels and enhance public health outcomes. The long-term benefits of improving air quality should be considered, notwithstanding worries about the potential economic implications of these rules [CARB], 2021). For instance, cutting down on air pollution can improve health and boost productivity, both of which benefit the economy. Green energy job growth and less reliance on fossil fuels are two additional benefits of investing in renewable energy.
The fact that wildfires and naturally occurring dust and pollen contribute to Sacramento’s air pollution does not mean that limits on industrial and transportation emissions are unnecessary. Instead, it emphasizes the need for a comprehensive strategy to improve air quality in the area. Improving Sacramento and California’s air quality should be a top priority to protect public health and the environment (Guijon et al., 2021). Long-term benefits of better air quality outweigh short-term concerns about the economy. A more secure and sustainable future for all Californians is possible with the help of more substantial limits on emissions and investments in renewable energy sources.
While considering air pollution in Sacramento/California, it is vital to consider more than just the health and economic benefits. Damage to local ecosystems and the acceleration of climate change are only two ways in which poor air quality compounds existing problems in the region. For instance, air pollution from vehicles and factories can lead to acid rain, which can harm groundwater and aquatic ecosystems. In addition, these emissions contribute to climate change, which in turn can have far-reaching consequences for ecosystems through, for example, altered temperature and precipitation patterns, an increase in the frequency and severity of natural catastrophes, and the loss of biodiversity (Guijon et al., 2021). Enhancing Sacramento and California’s air quality would help lessen these harmful environmental effects and pave the way for a greener tomorrow [CARB], 2021). This may involve a variety of measures, including but not limited to more substantial limits on emissions, pushing for widespread use of renewable energy technology, and lending financial assistance to conservation initiatives that safeguard local ecosystems.
Moreover, there may be far-reaching public health and environmental justice benefits to enhancing Sacramento’s air quality. Many of the problems experienced by the people of Sacramento and California are shared by other cities worldwide due to the global nature of air pollution [CARB], 2021). California’s strong attitude toward air quality and investment in effective solutions can serve as an example for other regions and motivate widespread action worldwide [CARB], 2021). So, bettering Sacramento’s air quality is about safeguarding residents’ health and well-being and promoting positive change that can benefit people and the planet at large.
Conclusion
As this essay concludes, arguments for and against more excellent controls on industrial and transportation emissions to enhance the air quality in Sacramento/California have been addressed. The detrimental health effects of air pollution much outweigh any possible economic impacts. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately affected by the health risks associated with poor air quality. Not only must emissions from industrial and traffic sources be reduced, but other variables, such as wildfires, natural dust, and pollen, must also be addressed if the air quality in Sacramento and California is to improve. Investing in green energy can lessen the need for fossil fuels and provide new employment opportunities.
References
California Air Resources Board. (2021). Current California GHG emission inventory data. Web.
California Chamber of Commerce. (2023, April 5). Calchamber reports. Advocacy. Web.
California Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). California Environmental Protection Agency. Web.
Guijon, O. L., Morphew, T., Ehwerhemuepha, L., & Galant, S. P. (2021). Evaluating the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on asthma morbidity. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 127(1), 91–99. Web.
Ramanathan, V. (2020). Chapter 5, Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Health: Common Sources, Similar Impacts, and Common Solutions. In Health of People, Health of Planet and our responsibility (pp. 49–57). Springer Nature.