Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Risk factors are elements, parameters, or potential perils that, if revealed in a person, make it more likely that an individual will advance a condition instead of someone chosen from the overall population. A risk factor anticipates an enhanced likelihood of future offending. According to a recent report from the Surgeon General of the United States, a risk factor is anything that increases the probability that a person will be harmed. Individual child factors, such as complications during pregnancy or birth and attitudes, are linked to risk factors. Adolescent parent/s, single-parent households, limited parental training, physical punishment, and accidental pregnancy are all examples of family/parental factors. Psychological/sociological theories tend to influence risk factors and criminal predators. Gender inequalities, among other things, mark the channels that connect child abuse and adult crime, although allegiances with deviant peers in adulthood increase delinquent behavior in both males and females.

Risk Factors and Criminal Predators in Childhood

Keeping children safe from sexual abuse is a gray area. Even specialists who have contacted guilty child abusers have commented on how “loveable” they show up. Most predators arise in the gray zone – predators that appear to be “nice” and personable “every day” (Farrington, 2020). Types of people and their exploitative behavior frequently stretch to how they handle and interact with some other seniors. Individual child factors are associated with risk influences such as Complications during pregnancy or birth, child disposition or attitudes, premature birth, and child impairment.

Risk factors include parenting practices, drug abuse, engagement in illegal behavior, family dysfunction or violent behavior, mental illnesses, child deemed as an issue by family members, the background of child maltreatment, sizeable extended family size, strain attention, and parenting practices disposition. Moreover, family/parental factors include adolescent parent/s, single-parent households’ family, limited parental training, physical punishment, accidental pregnancy, physiological and medical complications, low self-esteem, and social alienation. Social/environmental factors are associated with risk factors such as parental unemployment, socioeconomic disadvantage and residential stress (Farrington, 2020). In addition, denial of available welfare protection, lack of maternity care, poor surrounding, and local neighborhood conflict are all influential factors.

Psychological/sociological theories and Risk Factors and Criminal Predators in Childhood

Psychological/sociological theories play a role in the risk factors and criminal predators. First, enteropathogens are detrimental to children’s cognitive development, derived from cognitive approaches (Pękala et al., 2021). Other factors, however, are strongly related to child cognition. Interventions that promote intellectual abilities should prioritize reducing illness frequency, ensuring the protection and wholesomeness of the child’s environment, and enhancing nutrient intake. Social/ parental factors are also related to cognitive psychological theories. The impact of family perspective on childhood development has become more interesting recently. However, comprehending and describing how these effects work is difficult (Pękala et al., 2021). The slower rate of progress in children impacts their learning and their cooperation and communication with others. Lower IQ, poor communication skills, more diagnosable disorder, autistic symptoms in some cases and troubles in socialization or behavioral problems have all been identified as risk factors in children with slower development rates.

The environment at home is regarded as crucial in cognitive development changes, particularly during the first years of life, when students’ learning styles are mainly dependent on what their parents provide (Pękala et al., 2021). Physiological (for example household belongings, play resources) and social ( parent-child interrelations, number of dependents, and layout) elements of the family life, if favorable, provide mental stimuli and assistance needed for optimal development of young children cognitive skills, which in turn predicts their education and job success later in life. Observation-based and investigational studies provide evidence for the role of the family environment.

Parental responsively, constant interaction, coherent quality care, and a wide range of play-based learning strongly correlate with cognitive development. Although it is of low quality, home care is preferable to institutional care for children’s development than residential care (Pękala et al., 2021). In the broad sense, social (maternal sensitivity) and context-specific exposure times within the family life allow students to explore language and other mental functions useful for daily lessons. This occurs from the time they begin schooling and even beyond. As a result, family life has improved critical in laying the foundation for basic intellectual capabilities on which the classroom and other external factors will be created.

There is scientific proof that family food insecurity, maternal involvement, and other social determinants impact the effectiveness and effect of family life. Poverty-stricken parents cannot provide stimulatory materials (such as toys and books) for their toddlers, and they are frequently stressed and resort to severe sentences to teach their children (Pękala et al., 2021). The family life mitigates the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on brain performance in multiple occasions. This is coherent with the behaviorist approach, which holds that SES’s respective task through the more proximal family setting.

Furthermore, the impact of the family set on learning and memory has frequently been mentioned as being hampered by illness. For instance, the effect of family life on disease toddlers is relatively weaker than in regulatory systems. This is possibly due to down-regulation in terminally ill children, but also due to unequal treatment against these children by family members, which blunted the influence of the family life. In many instances, the issue of severe illness can sometimes improve health relationships. This is found in children in the late stages of HIV-1 infection instead of those in the previous phases of the condition. This complicated relationship with health factors hampers child stimulus in family life. As a result, these aspects should be considered when calculating the home influence.

Effects of Childhood Experiences on Criminal Behaviour

The mechanisms by which child maltreatment leads to delinquent behavior are not well comprehended. Dr. Herrenkohl and colleagues’ new NIJ-funded research findings help fill this information gap by recognizing variables that underlie the link between childhood maltreatment and adult illegal activity. Childhood maltreatment increases the risk of antisocial behavior during childhood by encouraging antisocial behavior in childhood and teenage years (Baglivio et al., 2020). Furthermore, gender inequalities mark the channels connecting child abuse and adult crime even though allegiances with deviant peers in adulthood increase delinquent behavior for males and females. With records of physical and sexual abuse in childhood, the influence of potential adult relationships in the link between child sexual abuse and adult crime differs in both males and females.

A sensitive and nurturing romantic relationship in adulthood reduces criminal behavior among men by decreasing men’s associations with deviant peers. Nevertheless, this protective channel is not found in women — a pleasant connection in adulthood does not reduce illegal acts or belonging with deviant peers (Baglivio et al., 2020). Having an antisocial sentimental partner is associated with continuous interaction with deviant peers, which intensifies delinquent behavior in women. Having an antisocial partner is linked to lower partner comfort, which predicts connection with deviant peers, a proximal predictive factor crime in men. In adult years, interactions with deviant peers and intimate partners may significantly raise delinquent behavior by legitimizing crime and strengthening coping skills to enhance criminal conduct in both males and females.

Supplemental research results from a sample of people with records of interpersonal violence during early life show that women are more prone to having rationalizing issues. Such influential aspect includes depression, separation anxiety, and nervousness alongside other factors. This happens during childhood development, which increases the risk of criminal offending (Baglivio et al., 2020). On the other hand, males are more prone for having to shift the blame behavioral issues during childhood development. The gender is more exposed to aggressive behavior, antagonism, and delinquent behavior, which later lead to adult criminal conduct as well as women. There is also substantiation of a “culture of abuse” among people who have experienced child abuse. When survivors of early life abuse commit violence against their peer group or associates later in life, they exhibit this consistent pattern. People with evidence of child abuse records are more prone to committing sexual or physical domestic violence in adult years than their non-maltreated peers.

Overall, Herrenkohl and colleagues observations recommend that treatments directed at minimizing the negative impact of child maltreatment on the adult criminal activity should be customized to the unsociable behaviors through neurodevelopment timing (Baglivio et al., 2020). Antisocial behavior that commences in childhood and teenage years, in specific, should be aimed directly to interrupt the perseverance of antisocial behavior into adult years, with work on cutting psychological symptoms in adolescent females. On the other hand, adult initiatives should emphasize the relationship with deviant peers and potential connections to reduce the regularization of criminality. Tailoring involvement initiatives to solve multiple aspects of the significant exchanges between child molestation and adult crime may successfully encourage deviance from antisocial behavior related to childhood harassment.

Having an experience with one of these red flags does not automatically imply that a person is in the existence of a sexual harasser. However, if a person has a nagging suspicion that something is wrong, one ought to be extra cautious, speak openly if their behavior and attitude is improper, and limit this person’s access to children. This is especially in a 1:1 circumstance, accounting for an approximated 80% of all childhood sexual exploitation (Baglivio et al., 2020). Increasing casual consciousness that a person is informed about child sexual abuse may put some prospective abusers on edge, fearing being caught.

Conclusively, some predators can be very compassionate with their pampering behavior patterns. For this reason, it is vital to know the likelihood of abuse with new friends and those we have known and grown to trust. By encouraging antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence, child maltreatment increases the risk of antisocial behavior during early life interactions. This consistent pattern emerges when survivors of childhood abuse commit violence against their peer group or associates later in life. More emphasis needs to be put in adolescent as well as childhood antisocial behaviors that tend to interfere with the later adulthood interaction. The main focus should aim at reducing psychological symptoms in adolescent females.

References

Baglivio, M., Wolff, K., DeLisi, M., & Jackowski, K. (2020). The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Psychopathic Features on Juvenile Offending Criminal Careers to Age 18. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(4), 337-364. Web.

Farrington, D. (2020). Childhood risk factors for criminal career duration: Comparisons with prevalence, onset, frequency, and recidivism. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 30(4), 159-171. Web.

Pękala, K., Kacprzak, A., Pękala-Wojciechowska, A., Chomczyński, P., Olszewski, M., & Marczak, M. et al. (2021). Risk Factors of Early Adolescence in the Criminal Career of Polish Offenders in the Light of Life Course Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6583. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, December 3). Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences. https://studycorgi.com/child-killers-the-role-of-adverse-childhood-experiences/

Work Cited

"Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences." StudyCorgi, 3 Dec. 2022, studycorgi.com/child-killers-the-role-of-adverse-childhood-experiences/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences'. 3 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences." December 3, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/child-killers-the-role-of-adverse-childhood-experiences/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences." December 3, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/child-killers-the-role-of-adverse-childhood-experiences/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences." December 3, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/child-killers-the-role-of-adverse-childhood-experiences/.

This paper, “Child Killers: The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.