Related Free Essays

Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been anecdotally considered to provide organizational performance advantages in the contemporary market. However, the majority of the studies conducted on the impact of CSR have been rather focused on organizational performance, with little other mediating effects considered. Fewer studies still have been conducted regarding companies operating in morally and ethically ambiguous industries, such as gambling, alcohol, and gun manufacture, despite companies in these industries being reasonably more invested in CSR strategies. This study, therefore, seeks to investigate the impact of CSR on employee retention in Ladbrokes, a gambling company in the U.K. A literature review approach of grey literature is implemented with the data sourced from the company’s website and company-issued documents exclusively. The results show that three tenets ought to be addressed for a company to foster a positive correlation between CSR strategies and employee retention. These tenets include job satisfaction, work meaningfulness, and employee engagement. From the CSR strategy implemented by Ladbrokes, the company effectively fulfills these tenets and reasonably implies that it promotes employee retention.

Introduction

The orthodox understanding of a corporation’s principal purpose is that of profit maximization. However, due to the advent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), companies are obligated to abide by moral norms, despite competition, or else risk incurring heavy penalties, and disadvantage in the market. This is especially important in instances where the corporation in question deals in products that may be widely regarded as ethically dubious, socially undesirable, or overall problematic (Pratten and Walton, 2008). In such cases, there is often a greater expectation of responsible behavior from the general population and statutory bodies.

While Corporate Social Responsibility has been extensively covered in recent literature, research, and scholarly works, the focus of the review has been primarily on customer management, and compliance with overarching authorities. The social responsibilities of businesses are also quite varied, depending on the industry, and general perception as well. This study, therefore, seeks to explore the intersection between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee retention. The focus of this paper is how corporate social responsibility in Ladbrokes impact upon employee retention. The result will ideally inform on CSR as an impact in organization productivity, and further create awareness of the company to the general public.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an essential component of organizational culture. CSR can be defined as an implementable business framework that introduces a self-regulating mechanism allowing the company to be socially accountable to its stakeholders, the general public, and itself (Liang and Renneboog, 2017). It comprises the process of incorporating social and environmental concerns into their operations and their interaction with shareholders. The impact of CSR on employees, who are prominent shareholders within a business entity, holds extensive research potential. This is further exacerbated by the industry within which Ladbrokes operates, which is in the ethically ambiguous activity of gambling.

Objectives of the Study

The primary objective of this research is to review the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) upon employee retention at Ladbrokes. To fulfill this overarching objective, the following specific objectives will be undertaken:

  1. To discover the various research works conducted in the area of corporate social responsibility and employee retention.
  2. To expound on the various factors that affect employee retention initiatives in Ladbrokes.
  3. To examine the influencing factors on job satisfaction, corporate social responsibility, and employee retention in the company.

Organization of the Study

The current chapter comprises the introduction, covering a succinct overview of corporate social responsibility, and the aims and objectives of this study. The second chapter will feature the literature review, where prevalent literature on the field will be assessed and themes identified. This review will be essential to contextualize the literary gap that this study seeks to feel. The third chapter will comprise the methodology implemented in the data collection and analysis while the fourth chapter will comprise the actual data analysis and interpretation of results. Finally, the fifth and final chapter will include the conclusions derived from the data analysis, as well as the recommendations made, and the implications of the overall study.

Literature Review

Much scholarly attention has been afforded to the concepts of corporate social performance and social responsibility over the decades. Furthermore, academicians and business managers have witnessed the evolution of how corporate social responsibility morphed from an irrelevant and mundane idea to becoming a crucial underpinning of research agendas (Moura-Leite and Padgett, 2011). Business entities have been forced to come to terms with the fact that adopting a socially responsible outlook is essential for busines growth. This is due to the fact that the contemporary market is rife with ethical, legal, and environmental challenges that significantly influence the organizational behavior; and solely focusing on economic management may no longer be feasible. This literature review section will comprise a thorough, yet succinct overview of prevalent literature regarding CSR, employee management, employee retention, and organizational management and performance.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be addressed in a continuum. On one end the continuum, are philanthropic endeavors that directly contribute to the environmental and social issues identified or received by the company. These issues may also include gaps that have been identified by the higher-tier management as well. These particular activities have little to no impact on the corporation’s core activities, its business model, or the technologies implemented. On the other extreme of the continuum are the set of practices that are adopted in direct response to the demands placed on the corporation by society, and the activities influencing the organization from various dynamic forces (D’Amato and Roome, 2009). The representation of CSR on this continuum leads to a rather popular definition of the practice as the set of practices, policies, and programs that are implemented within a business and its operations, as well as the decision-making process to ensure that the corporation can maximize the positive impacts of its operation within a community (D’Amato and Roome, 2009). This, however, requires the fulfilment of certain conditions including the ethical undertaking of business activities, and the provision of quality commodities.

Turcsanyi and Sisaye (2013) further reiterate the definition of CSR, and expound it further. Corporate Social Responsibility is defined as the sustained commitment made by a business entity; whose primary business focus is profit maximization, to act ethically and enhance financial development while guaranteeing the quality of life of its employees, their families, the immediate community, and the society as a whole. The ideology behind CSR is that corporations should strive to achieve a sustainable balance between profit maximization, and the expenses made by promoting the positive influence and minimizing negative influence of its operations in society. Therefore, firms concerned with CSR are economically competitive, while fulfilling the required tasks necessary for their continued existence and survival. These tasks may include responding to their users’ needs, delivering above the minimum requirements, general observation of ethicality, providing conducive working conditions, environmental considerations and community integration.

A socially responsible business entity can also compete favorably for stakeholder goodwill, and effectively differentiate itself from its economic competitors by integrating social welfare into their business opportunities. However, corporations would not be incentivized to act socially responsible if these corporate responsibility parameters are not integrated into their decision-making and governance structures (Misani, 2010; Lenssen et al., 2009). The significance of this integration is underlined by the fact that over 80 percent of the global 250 firms currently release their CSR information, and a further 75 percent have a formal corporate CSR strategy implemented (Blasco and King, 2017). The implementation of a viable CSR strategy is, therefore, paramount to an institution’s organizational success.

An organization can be socially responsible through being mindful of ethical operating procedures, being environmentally friendly, investor friendly, employee friendly, or a patron of the arts, learning institutions, community outreach programs or other avenues. In fact, Bučiūnienė and Kazlauskaitė (2012) posit that a business entity can implement CSR by being mindful of the environment, and the employees, as well as supporting community projects such as schools, medical provision, and cultural programs. This proactive implementation of CSR can significantly minimize stakeholder conflicts, and maximize loyalty across the organization.

Internal Corporate Social Responsibility

Internal CSR is primarily aimed at the internal core operations of a corporation. Cavazotte and Chang (2016) assert that internal CSR is concerned with the actions that can be taken within the organization to enhance the welfare of the employees, their productivity, and lives; consequently, influencing the corporation’s productivity and profitability. Thus, Internal CSR is defined by Low (2016) as CSR practices that are primarily related with improving the physical and psychological welfare and working conditions of employees. The sole focus with employees is owing to the fact that they are considered a very important stakeholder group within any organization (Thang and Fassin, 2017). Further, according to Mory, Wirtz and Göttel (2016), there exists four groups or value classes of Internal CSR practices, which relate to the development of an employee’s quality of work, the welfare and satisfaction of the employee, development of skills and social equity, and finally the workers’ health and safety at work.

Employee Engagement

The contemporary marketplace has proven to business managers that having a high-performing employee workforce is imperative for the survival and continued growth of a company. Resultantly, employee engagement has steadily become a rising concern and priority in many organizations as a highly engaged workforce can increase productivity, profitability, and innovation, while reducing acquisition costs, and maintaining top-tier talent (Harvard Business Review, 2013). It is, therefore, essential that every company adequately engage their employees to maintain a competitive edge in the market.

Employee engagement does not have a particular cohesive, and universally accepted, definition provided in scholarly literature. However, several definitions that are similar to an extent have been provided regarding the concept of employee engagement. Gupta and Sharma (2016) defined employee engagement as the positive outlook elicited in employees towards an organization, its culture, and held values. Engaged employees, from this definition, are intimately familiar with the overall business context, and dedicated to working with colleagues to benefit the corporation. Ariani (2013), on the other hand, defines employee engagement as the workplace approach that is designed to guarantee that employees are wholly committed to the overarching organizational values and goals, contribute to organizational success, while simultaneously enhancing their own sense of welfare. Therefore, employee engagement is the intelligent and emotional commitment of an employee, or a group of employees to a particular organization that ultimately influences organizational performance. Shuck and Wollard (2010) expound on this definition by asserting that employee engagement is the individual employee’s cognitive and behavioral state, as directed towards a desired organizational outcome. Therefore, employee engagement can be viewed as a construct that outlines the differences between employees, and the conscious dedication and effort they invest towards their jobs.

Developing Employee Engagement

It is imperative for organizations to strive towards an engaged workforce. This is because employers ideally want employees who would do their utmost best to help the company meet its organizational goals, and employees want a fulfilling job that is both challenging yet meaningful (Markos and Sridevi, 2010). Therefore, in order to foster and nurture employee engagement, a two-way relationship between the employer and employee is required. A good relationship can be developed with the employees through adoption of good management philosophies, providing an enriching professional atmosphere, and recognizing employee potentials and talents. Adequately engaged employees will have many positive attributes, including being self-motivated, passionate, high energy levels, and deeply connected with their tasks. Due to these qualities, and overall contentment, engaged employees tend to hold their jobs longer, while working better and smarter, and consequently, leading to improved performance on an individual and organizational level.

Many factors have been accredited to either facilitating or impeding employee engagement. For instance, Ariani (2013) posits that a clear understanding of how all jobs contribute to the overall performance strategy, as well as recognition for high performers and a company-wide communication of performance goals were important drivers of employee engagement. These drivers help create an implementable road map towards organizational excellence. Other prevalent drivers according to Kim, Kolb and Kim (2012) include career growth opportunities, a clear correlation between employee input and organizational performance, nature of the work, pride regarding the corporation, employee development, managerial relationships, and co-workers. Corporations should, therefore, understand and exploit various antecedents to effectively facilitate employee engagement, and sustain this engagement.

According to Ferreira and De Oliveira (2014), there are three widely used facets to determine whether employees of a specific organization are adequately engaged or not. The three facets taken into consideration include dedication, vigor, and absorption. Dedication comprises having a sense of pride towards the work allocated, and being strongly involved in the tasks assigned, while absorption refers to the pleasant immersion of an individual in their allocated duties. Finally, vigor refers to the conscious willingness to exert oneself into the job given, and the ability to not be easily fatigued, and persevere in the face of challenges.

The Gambling Industry in the U.K.

Many human activities are harmful if done in excess. Therefore, society often expects that an adult individual can implement self-restraint to prevent damage to the self. However, some products may be addictive, and ideally, some vulnerable subsets of the population may require further intervention and protection. Gambling is a prevalent example of these products. While for many people, it constitutes a simple hobby that combines the element of risk with the allure of financial reward. For a few people, however, gambling may lead to debilitating problems that may visit harm upon those people who are closest to them and the community at large.

Further, the Church of England Ethical Advisory Group cautions that gambling contributes to social ills that culminate in severe addiction to the activity, and should be reasonably avoided (Young, 2006). The social ills referred to may include financial debt, economic difficulty, family issues, and in more extreme situations, theft, depression and suicide. The British Gambling Preference Survey (2007) further provides that the number of people who are problematic betting may approximately be between 236,500 to 284,000 individuals. The focus of this study, however, is not to argue the morality of gambling, but to investigate the level of socially responsible control that is exerted in the industry, specifically by Landbrokes.

Contextually, the Gambling sector in the U.K. is under consistent scrutiny. Therefore, if it were to not behave responsibly, especially in the matter of problem gambling, there may be more stringent legislative controls implemented. However, the impact of the existing social responsibility measures taken by gambling firms operating within the U.K. is rather ambiguous. This is underlined by Pratten and Walton (2008), who state that the gambling industry’s CSR strategies implemented in the U.K. market are more of a public relations smoke show, and their efficacy is doubtful. Furthermore, Leung and Gray (2016) provide that there is remarkably little disclosure done by gambling firms regarding responsible gambling, which is the primary social responsibility of these firms. This study will, therefore, seek to investigate the CSR strategy and reporting of Ladbrokes, and how this influences employee engagement, and ultimately retention.

Methodology

This study will seek to investigate the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on employee retention. The particular review will be done within a morally ambiguous industry, with specific focus on Ladbrokes in the U.K. To fulfill this overarching objective, the following specific objectives will be executed:

  1. To discover the various research works conducted in the area of corporate social responsibility and employee retention.
  2. To expound on the various factors that affect employee retention initiatives in Ladbrokes.
  3. To examine the influencing factors on job satisfaction, corporate social responsibility, and employee retention in the company

Research Method and Design

This study employs a qualitative research method. This approach is primarily used to address contextual problems involving perspective, experience, or the opinions of the study population, or individuals with intimate knowledge of the research problem (Hammarberg, Kirkman and De Lacey, 2016) Furthermore, the data from this approach does not require implemented measuring metrics, and counting. Instead, the researcher can focus on the exploration of contextual attitudes and concepts from the literature reviewed.

The qualitative approach was deemed appropriate for this study, as understanding the impact of corporate social responsibility on employee retention was the critical concern. This research problem is heavily qualitative, and the parameters used for the analysis would be better reviewed from a qualitative philosophy. Ultimately, this approach also allowed the more extensive review of the interrelationships between corporate social responsibility and employee engagement within the research site, which do not take any numeric forms. The qualitative approach was more preferred over the alternative quantitative method due to its flexibility in capturing perceptions and opinions, which also allowed the easier triangulation of any preliminary findings with more data.

A quantitative approach was excluded from this particular study due to its primary aim of confirming hypotheses using numerical data, or measuring inter-variable relationships as provided by Creswell and Creswell (2017). This approach would have only been appropriate if statistical instruments are implemented to measure data and address the study’s research questions. The requirement of numerical data, therefore, renders the quantitative and mixed-methods approaches null for this study.

Owing to the overarching research approach being qualitative, this study will also implement a literature review research design. However, to improve the reliability and validity of the study, the inclusion criterion of the materials used will be limited to grey literature. Grey literature refers to manifold documents that are often procedurally produced on all levels of academia, business, government and industry in many print and electronic formats. This literature is often protected by intellectual property rights, and are of sufficient quality to be curated and preserved by institutional repositories and public libraries, but are not published commercially. Ultimately, the production of grey literature is not done with the primary purpose of publishing with commercial bodies. The examples of grey literature that is implementable in this study includes dissertations and theses, patent information and filings, procedures and policies, conference abstracts, regulatory information, unpublished trial data, reports, and government and statutory publications.

The inclusion of grey literature in this literature review will be essential in minimizing publication bias. This type of bias is exhibited in published scholarly research. It often occurs when the outcome of the research or experimental study directly influences the decision to otherwise publish and distribute it. This can, in the long-run lead to the formulation and testing of hypotheses in future based on inaccurate impressions gleaned from the existing scientific literature. This results in extensive wastage in research opportunities and resources.

Data Collection Methods and Procedures

The data collection criterion for this research will comprise secondary data sourced from online sources wholly. Secondary data is widely defined as any form of data that was already collected through primary sources and availed for other researchers to implement within their own studies and derive their own results (Creswell and Creswell, 2017). Limiting the data collection to solely online sources will significantly reduce the complexity of material acquisition and review, and reduce redundancies in the data, while maintaining the overall quality of the analysis and interpretation of the results.

Furthermore, this research study has been conducted during a rather unique yet trying period with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. As a result, primary data collection has been significantly compromised, as interpersonal contact has been severely limited to curb the spread of COVID-19, which is highly infectious. The initial data collection for this research study had been qualitative interviews, but due to the pandemic, was revised to literature review of grey literature, primarily obtained from the Ladbroke’s website and company-issued publications. However, the overall quality of the data analysis and interpretation of results will not be reasonably compromised from the change in overall data collection approach.

Study Limitations and De-limitations

The study does have some inherent limitations stemming from its design. The data source will be primarily the company’s website and company-issued publications, which may reduce the generalizability of the study results to other stakeholders, and firms. Furthermore, this issue is exacerbated by the fact that Ladbrokes operates within a unique market, both literally and morally, and therefore the strategies employed may not be generalizable to a large variety of firms and other stakeholders. Finally, the company may provide biased information, in a bid to surpass scrutiny and moral obligations, and gain public favor due to the nature of its business. However, this issue will be addressed by triangulating any collected data with available contextual data from news sources and online journals.

A significant delimitation of the study involves using online sources of grey literature, which significantly reduces the complexity of data collection, and places the researcher in lesser harm in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The utilization of the company’s own website and publication data is also a delimitation of the study aimed towards reducing the overall complexity as well. However, despite the delimitations employed, the quality of the data collection and analysis will not be reasonably compromised.

Ethical Considerations

This research study will exclusively use secondary data, comprising grey literature sourced from Ladbroke’s website and company publications. Consequently, this study will forego ethical considerations regarding protection of human participants, as no respondents will be involved. However, terms of fair use of intellectual property materials will be followed, and any findings that are not the researcher’s own will be appropriately cited and referenced according to the Harvard referencing style.

Summary and Transition

This study implements a qualitative approach to the research, characterized by a literature review research design using grey literature. Grey literature refers to documents that were produced by institutions, scholars, or the government, but not for the primary purpose of publication. In this case, the Ladbroke’s website will be used, along with any company-issued publications, such as its annual CSR report. The appropriate findings will be outlined and discussed in the next section, which is Chapter 4, along with the interpretation of the data to address the research questions of this study.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

This section will comprise a brief company overview of Ladbrokes to contextualize its prevalent information and ground the research. Furthermore, a literature review of the interrelationships between corporate social responsibility and employee retention will be conducted, with a funnel approach ultimately addressing the gambling industry, and ideally comparable firms, in stature and markets, as Ladbrokes. Finally, the company website, and other company-issued literature will be reviewed to identify its CSR implementation strategy, and correlate these findings contextually with its employee engagement.

Contextual Overview: Ladbrokes

Ladbrokes is currently a constituent brand of GVC Holdings, a British sports betting and gambling company following an acquisition of the company in 2018. In 2016, however, Ladbrokes had merged with Gala Coral to create the resulting company, Ladbrokes Coral, which was the largest high street bookmaker in the U.K. before being acquired by online magnate GVC Holdings (BBC, 2017; GVC Holdings, 2019). GVC holdings now holds 53.5 percent of the combined group, with the constituent brands outlined in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Overview and Sub-brands of GVC Holdings. Source BBC.com

Parent Company: GVC Holdings
Constituent Brands
  • Bwin
  • Sportingbet
  • Betboo
  • Gamebookers
  • Partypoker
  • Partycasino
  • CasinoClub
  • Gioco Digitale
  • Foxy Bingo
  • Foxy Casino
Ladbrokes Coral
Constituent Brands
  • Ladbrokes
  • Coral
  • Gala Casino
  • Gala Bingo
  • Eurobet
  • Betdaq
  • Sportium

The final worth of the acquisition is, however, subject to statutory review of gaming machines termed the Fixed-Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs). This underlines the existing scrutiny of gambling as a morally dubious venture, and the need for corporate social responsibility geared to addressing problematic gambling. In the U.K., the Department of Culture, Media, and Sport (DCM) indicated that it would cap the size of gambling stakes that gamblers can reasonably place on FOBTs amid concerns of problematic gambling harming susceptible people.

Ultimately, GVC Holdings, and in extension, Ladbrokes, is a profit maximizing company. Therefore, the FOBTs restrictions, which are proposed to cap the maximum amount per spin from £100 to between £2 and £50, would impact overall profitability (BBC, 2017). This statutory scrutiny also affects stakeholder relations. Under the terms of the acquisition deal, each shareholders of the Ladbrokes Coral group would get 32.7p cash and 0.141 ordinary GVC Holdings shares in addition to a contingent value worth to a maximum of 42.8p. This contingent value would be decided upon the outcome of the DCM review (BBC, 2017).

Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Retention

There is an overwhelming focus in prevalent literature on CSR at the organizational level, but to impact on external stakeholders such as organizational reputation and branding. However, little recent research looks into the effects of CSR in employee retention, and more so within a morally ambiguous industry such as alcohol production, gambling, and guns and weapons manufacture. In broader literature, CSR has been identified to have an overall positive effect on employee retention (Wong and Leow, 2016; Paruzel, Everding and Maier, 2017; G.W Paulsen, Perera and Kadoura, 2020; Carnahan, Kryscynski and Olson, 2017; Brammer, Millington and Rayton, 2007). It is, therefore, imperative that organizations implement corporate social responsibility strategies in the human resource management as well.

Being a good corporate citizen is an important aspect of overall corporate branding (Waldman, Siegel and Javidan, 2006; Zedeck, 2011). Further empirical evidence provides that CSR has the capacity to create overall positive organizational identification, and improve the welfare of employees, with changes in the relational work dimensions positively altering work meaningfulness and organizational performance. The three tenets outlined in Table 2 below comprise the primary antecedents to employee retention as provided in prevalent literature, and supported by the job characteristics model from Hackman and Oldham (1976).

Table 2: The CSR tenets to Employee Retention

The CSR-Enhanced Tenets to Employee Retention
Tenets Sources
  1. CSR-Enhanced Job Satisfaction
Wong and Leow, 2016; Waldman, Siegel and Javidan. 2006; Brammer, Millington and Rayton, 2007; Edmans, 2012; Liang and Renneboog, 2017.
  1. CSR-Enhanced Employee Engagement
Wong and Leow, 2016; Brammer, Millington and Rayton, 2007; Ariani, 2013; Shuck and Wollard, 2010; Markos and Sridevi, 2010.
  1. CSR-Enhanced Work Meaningfulness
Wong and Leow, 2016; Edmans, 2012; Kim, Kolb and Kim, 2012.

From the prevalent literature reviewed, it would reasonably follow that a firm that effectively integrates its internal corporate social responsibility to integrate strategies for improving job satisfaction, employee engagement, and work meaningfulness would enjoy better employee retention. This assertion is supported by Wong and Leow (2016) who assert that these three tenets comprise the primary benefits that are significant for the attraction and retention of workplace personnel. The Ladbrokes CSR strategy will, therefore, be reviewed against this framework, with the strengths and deficiencies identified accordingly.

The Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy at Ladbrokes

The CSR strategy of Ladbrokes cannot be divorced from that of its parent company, GVC Holdings. Furthermore, Ladbrokes issued its Corporate Social Responsibility Policy document online until the year 2018, with the most recent one being published under the GVC Holdings brand in 2019. This policy document also outlines a significant CSR revitalization and revision, as GVC implements the new CSR Strategy effective the start of 2020 (GVC Holdings, 2019).

The overall CSR strategy of Ladbrokes revolves around fair play, and is supported by three core pillars; that of safer gambling, responsible employment, and finally, responsible communities and markets, and further upon overarching responsible business operations. The acquisition of Ladbrokes Coral by GVC Holdings brought together companies with different cultures and business operating models (GVC Holdings, 2019) resulting in a company that was highly diversified and significantly larger. The company’s CSR Strategy can be graphically outlined as follows in Figure 1 below:

Ladbrokes’ CSR Strategy
Figure 1: Ladbrokes’ CSR Strategy

The CSR Strategy for Ladbrokes was developed following an extensive internal discussion with colleagues, and external consultation with experts, supplemented with a benchmark against industry peers, expected regulatory developments, and materiality assessments (GSV Holdings, 2019). The strategy outlined is also an evolving framework based on an understanding of the market sector, a conservative projection of its future direction, and the elements that are essential to stakeholders.

The overarching theme of fair play is concerned with the development of a socially responsible, yet sustainable betting and gaming entity on a global scale. This aligns with the orthodox assumption of Ladbrokes being a profit maximizing business entity. The first core value of safer gambling is geared to tackle problematic gambling and is steeped in moral and ethical considerations. In this core value, Ladbrokes seeks to understand its global impact, and reduce its overall harm, while providing a rewarding leisure experience accordingly. Further, the responsible employment pillar is the company’s internal CSR strategy, and comprises addressing any imbalances in the workforce, address inclusivity and representation, and provide quality employment. Finally, the responsible communities and markets pillar outlines the company’s willingness to respond to societal needs, and leave a positive economic footprint (GVC Holdings, 2019). Each pillar is, then further supported by broad responsible business operations that capture the fundamental issues that Ladbrokes manages daily. These operations represent legal requirements, as well as provisions to act with integrity, openly, and honestly.

Ladbrokes’ Internal Corporate Social Responsibility

The internal CSR at Ladbrokes addresses the company’s strategy to creating and maintaining a quality employment experience for its entire workforce. This is further concerned with developing a physically and psychologically conducive environment to work in. As Ladbrokes states, “Our people are our greatest asset. We aim to be a destination employer for talented and passionate individuals…” (GVC Holdings, 2019, p.13). The company follows an international business model, with a workforce comprising 25,000 employees in over 20 countries. However, 77 percent of this workforce is based within the United Kingdom. An extensive internal CSR strategy is, therefore, required to improve employee retention among this staff.

GVC Holdings developed a Code of Conduct that summarizes the principles, policies, and standards that underpin the company’s requirements from its employees in 2018. This Code of Conduct is further integrated in Human Resource Management, within employee induction and training policies to ensure that all employees are aware of their responsibilities, and what to expect in return. The code of conduct is compliant to International Labor Organization standards, and supports the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The code further helps employees throughout their employment, and helps develop their careers (GVC Holdings, 2019)

The company also launched its Well-me health and wellbeing strategy, that is primarily aimed at enhancing the emotional and physical welfare of employees. This particular implementation is dependent on six focus areas including:

  1. Leadership Alignment. This includes the provision of education on the importance of wellbeing, and further emphasizing the significance of role modeling of behaviors and values from leaders.
  2. Colleague touchpoints. The Well-me program will be delivered across several colleague touchpoints from employee induction and recruitment, to performance management, and rewards, learning, and development.
  3. Wellbeing Champions. There are volunteers allocated across the company to communicate regarding mental health, and advocate for wellbeing initiatives.
  4. Live Well. This campaign will be aimed at improving lifestyle, diet, and social inclusion. This will be attained by providing education, courses, and practical advice to raise awareness and develop skills.
  5. Think Well. A campaign aimed at enhancing mental health, stress management, and resilience.
  6. Work Well. Frequent optimization and auditing of work environments and working practices, with a particular focus on health and wellbeing.

Overall, Ladbrokes aims at being an inclusive and people-oriented business, with an enhanced rewarding environment. Its international diversity and inclusion (D&I) strategy outlined in 2018 is aimed at designing a 3-year road map towards a more inclusive and diversified employee workforce. The first milestone will be the inclusion of more women in managerial positions and overall, more gender inclusivity (GSV Holdings, 2019). This will be achieved through consistent training and sensitization on implicit biases and the significance of inclusive leadership. The program will then be expanded to address broader diversity issues, including ethnicity, sexual orientation, and disabilities. Executive-level sponsors will be employed to champion different avenues of diversity, with regular employee engagement surveys (GSV Holdings, 2019). The overall performance indicators and gender diversity ratios are outlined in Figures A1 and A2 in the appendices.

The company also seeks to be a flexible employer that allows employees to work around existing commitments. As a result, 42 percent of the U.K. employee population chose to work part-time to accommodate other responsibilities such as childcare arrangements, school, and other engagements (GSV Holdings, 2019). In 2019, the parental leave provisions were implemented as well, with revisions on flexible working, and other novel working strategies on retail and digital business fronts. The adopted policy remuneration framework also results in lower vested remuneration levels, and consequently a more balanced ratio as outlined in Figure A1 in the appendices (GSV Holdings, 2019).

Interpretation of Results

The fact that corporate social responsibility positively influences employee retention is highly supported in prevalent literature. However, while there exists fairly little on companies operating in morally ambiguous industries, there is no reasonable provision to suggest that the results from other industries cannot be generalized. The literature review also provides that three tenets are particularly effective in promotion employee retention from CSR strategies. These include CSR-enhanced job satisfaction, employee engagement, and work meaningfulness. Ladbrokes features and extensive internal corporate social responsibility provision to address the physical and psychological welfare of employees, and addresses the above tenets accordingly.

Based on the review of the company’s internal CSR strategy, Ladbrokes effectively addresses job satisfaction through its CSR strategy of providing a flexible working strategy, parental leave, and fair remuneration packages. This allows a better sense of contentment, and emotional attachment to the company from the employees, eliciting higher levels of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction has been outlined as a reliable predictor of employee retention.

On the other hand, GSV Holdings, and in extension, Ladbrokes, provides CSR-enhanced work meaningfulness through the provision of an exhaustive mental, physical, and social wellbeing program. The Well-me program, coupled with the company’s safer gambling approach provides a holistic element to working at Ladbrokes, and allows employees to contribute, not only economically to society, but socially and mentally to fellow colleagues, and the general public. This approach also serves to address the overarching moral and ethical ambiguity with working in a gambling firm; better aligning personal employee values, with the overarching values of the business.

Finally, CSR-enhanced employee engagement is addressed in several facets of Ladbrokes’s CSR strategy. Perhaps most importantly is the implementation of open communication right from employment recruitment and induction, through the employment process itself, rewards, learning and development. This communication helps to foster the dedication, absorption, and vigor of employees in their work duties, and overall help address employee engagement within the company. The attainment of these three tenets heavily implies that the CSR strategy implemented by Ladbrokes is sufficient to foster and promote employee retention.

Chapter Summary and Transition

Ladbrokes is, as of 2018, a constituent brand of GSV Holdings, which controls over 50 percent of the company. As a result, the CSR strategy of Ladbrokes cannot be divorced from that of its parent company. GSV Holdings employs an extensive CSR strategy for the year 2019-2020 and publishes the policy recommendations into the public domain. Significantly, the CSR strategy involves safer gambling practices that are testament to the company’s morally ambiguous products, and an internal CSR strategy that provides job satisfaction, work meaningfulness, and employee engagement; tenets identified as implying strong positive correlation with employee retention. The following section; Chapter 5, will comprise the conclusion of this study, recommendations, implications of the study, and direction for future studies.

Conclusions & Recommendations

There exists fairly limited literature on employee retention, as influenced by Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in morally ambiguous industries. However, scholarly research and other academic studies have been done extensively regarding CSR and its broad impact on employee retention (Wong and Leow, 2016; Brammer, Millington and Rayton, 2007; Markos and Sridevi, 2010). From the existing literature, a framework can be developed regarding the factors that highly and positively correlate CSR strategies with employee retention in organizations to develop tenets that should be addressed by any organization seeking to reap the benefits of employee retention.

These three tenets include CSR-enhanced job satisfaction, work meaningfulness, and employee engagement as supported by Wong and Leow (2016), Edmans (2012), Kim, Kolb and Kim (2012), Brammer, Millington and Rayton (2007), Ariani (2013), Shuck and Wollard (2010), Markos and Sridevi (2010), Waldman, Siegel and Javidan (2006), and Liang and Renneboog (2017). Therefore, it reasonably follows that an organization that appropriately addresses the three identified tenets would positively influence employee retention as well.

Ladbrokes, through its parent company, GSV Holdings implements a comprehensive CSR strategy resting on the three primary pillars or safe gambling, responsible employment, and responsible communities and society. The first is characteristic of the company’s involvement in a morally and ethically ambiguous product, and seeks to identify its impact and mitigate the prevalence of problematic gambling. This also inadvertently helps with the internal CSR in aligning employee values and ideals with the company’s own and improving the meaningfulness of the work. Overall, the Ladbrokes internal CSR strategy addresses the three identified tenets, and it follows that the company appropriately fosters employee retention.

Recommendations

The findings of the study qualitatively establish that an organization that implements a valid CSR strategy may reap benefits exceeding short-term organizational performance, but also in regards to human resource management. These results and the developed framework outlining the CSR-enhanced tenets to be addressed during the development of a CSR strategy are essential in academia and organizational management as well. This study, therefore, provides an essential foundation for the design and implementation of CSR strategies, regardless of the moral ambiguity of the industry.

Implications to Existing Research

The current study complements current studies done on the impact CSR strategies and implementation to overall organizational performance. Furthermore, it also complements the findings of current studies done in the correlative repercussions of corporate social responsibility on human resource management policies. It provides a framework for the design and delivery of CSR strategies that could be adopted and implemented in future studies, or used to check the validity and generalizability of current studies in the field.

Direction for future research

Future studies in this area of study may implement a quantitative or a mixed methods approach to provide more empirically sound findings. While this study had a contextual significance using qualitative methods, a quantitative approach may significantly reduce subjective bias, as the findings of the current study are inherently influenced by the researcher’s judgment. Other morally ambiguous industries are also available, such as companies operating within the alcohol production, and gun and weapon manufacturing sectors. Therefore, comparable studies can be conducted, and the findings comparatively analyzed to improve the overall body of work.

References

Ariani, D.W. (2013) ‘The relationship between employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behavior’, International Journal of Business Administration, 4(2), p.46.

BBC. (2017) Ladbrokes Coral bought by online rival GVC, Web.

Blasco, J.L. and King, A. (2017) ‘The road ahead: the KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017’, Zurich: KPMG International. Retrieved November, 20, pp.2018.

Brammer, S., Millington, A. and Rayton, B. (2007) ‘The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), pp.1701-1719. Web.

Bučiūnienė, I. and Kazlauskaitė, R. (2012) ‘The linkage between HRM, CSR and performance outcomes’, Baltic Journal of Management, 5, pp.499-511. Web.

Carnahan, S., Kryscynski, D. and Olson, D. (2017) ‘When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11’, Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), pp.1932-1962. Web.

Cavazotte, F. and Chang, N.C. (2016) ‘Internal corporate social responsibility and performance: A study of publicly traded companies’, BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 13(4). Web.

Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2017) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Web.

Edmans, A. (2012) ‘The link between job satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), pp.1-19. Web.

Ferreira, P. and de Oliveira, E.R. (2014) ‘Does corporate social responsibility impact on employee engagement?’ Journal of Workplace Learning, 26, 232-247. Web.

GVC Holdings. Fair Play 2019/2020. Web.

Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G. (1976) ‘Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory’, Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), pp.250-279. Web.

Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M. and de Lacey, S. (2016) ‘Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them’, Human reproduction, 31(3), pp.498-501. Web.

Harvard Business Review (2013) The impact of employee engagement on performance. Web.

Kim, W., Kolb, J.A. and Kim, T. (2013) ‘The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda’, Human Resource Development Review, 12(3), pp.248-276. Web.

Lenssen, G., Tyson, S., Pickard, S., Bevan, D., D’Amato, A. and Roome, N., (2009) ‘Toward an integrated model of leadership for corporate responsibility and sustainable development: a process model of corporate responsibility beyond management innovation’, Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9, pp.421-434. Web.

Leung, T.C.H. and Gray, R. (2016) ‘Social responsibility disclosure in the international gambling industry: A research note’, Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(1), pp. 73-90. Web.

Liang, H. and Renneboog, L. (2017) ‘On the foundations of corporate social responsibility’, The Journal of Finance, 72(2), pp.853-910. Web.

Low, M.P. (2016) ‘Corporate social responsibility and the evolution of internal corporate social responsibility in 21st century’, Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(1), pp.56-74.

Markos, S. and Sridevi, M.S. (2010) ‘Employee engagement: The key to improving performance’, International journal of business and management, 5(12), p.89.

Misani, N. (2010) ‘The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices’, Management Research Review, 33, pp.734-748. Web.

Mory, L., Wirtz, B.W. and Göttel, V. (2016) ‘Factors of internal corporate social responsibility and the effect on organizational commitment’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(13), pp.1393-1425.

Moura‐Leite, R.C. and Padgett, R.C. (2011) ‘Historical background of corporate social responsibility’, Social Responsibility Journal. 7, 528-539. Web.

Paruzel, A., Everding, S., and Maier, G.W. (2017) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Retention’. Presented at the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology Congress (EAWOP), Dublin. Web.

Paulsen, P.S., Perera, B.E. and Kaddoura, M.H. (2020) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and its Effect on Employee Retention Intention: A quantitative study of employee needs, motivation factors and hygiene factors’ Unpublished Thesis. Web.

Pratten, J.D. and Walton, S. (2008) Policy and reality: Corporate social responsibility in the U.K. gambling industry. Web.

Shuck, B. and Wollard, K. (2010) ‘Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations’, Human resource development review, 9(1), pp.89-110. Web.

Waldman, D.A., Siegel, D.S. and Javidan, M. (2006) ‘Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility’, Journal of management studies, 43(8), pp.1703-1725. Web.

Wong, W.J. and Leow, C.S. (2016) ‘The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Retention’, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, pp.911-921. Web.

Young, A. (2006) Gambling or gaming, entertainment or exploitation? Ethical Investment Advisory Group of the Church of England. Web.

Zedeck, S.E. (2011) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. viii-598). American Psychological Association.

Appendices

Performance Indicators for GSV Holdings
Figure A 1: Performance Indicators for GSV Holdings
Gender Diversity metrics at GSV Holdings
Figure A 2: Gender Diversity metrics at GSV Holdings

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, June 6). Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes. https://studycorgi.com/corporate-social-responsibility-activities-in-ladbrokes/

Work Cited

"Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes." StudyCorgi, 6 June 2022, studycorgi.com/corporate-social-responsibility-activities-in-ladbrokes/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes'. 6 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes." June 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/corporate-social-responsibility-activities-in-ladbrokes/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes." June 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/corporate-social-responsibility-activities-in-ladbrokes/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes." June 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/corporate-social-responsibility-activities-in-ladbrokes/.

This paper, “Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Ladbrokes”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.