Introduction
To comprehend how a person’s users’ brains function in every business, a significant specialization is in digital psychology and persuasion. A region of cognitive psychologists that has drawn interest is comprehending how people make decisions (Andrews, 2017). Theories are developed to describe how people make choices and the kind of variables that affect decisions in the now and the future (Roetzel, 2019). In order to comprehend the decisions that are made, one must first grasp the elements that affect the decision-making procedure. This paper is written in order to analyze how the decision-making process affects internal influences, especially psychological factors.
Discussion
Heuristics provide a foundation for making wise selections fast and without difficulty. Heuristics come in a variety of forms and are used to describe the decision-making process. In general, people try to minimize the amount of effort required to make judgments, and heuristics act as a simple road map for doing so (Yu, 2020). In other words, it lessens the number of effort people need to expend. Heuristics and factors affecting decision-making work together to form an essential part of critical thinking.
Past experiences, various cognitive biases, an increase in commitment and sunk costs, individual characteristics, such as age and socioeconomic status, and a sense of personal relevance are all critical considerations. Decisions made in the past have an impact on decisions made in the present. Indeed, people are more likely to make the same choice in a comparable circumstance when something beneficial comes from their options (Páez-Gallego, Gallardo-López, López-Noguero & Rodrigo-Moriche, 2020). People, however, often try to avoid making the same mistakes twice. This is significant in that decisions made in the future that are based on the past may not be the optimal ones.
The customer decision-making process consists of five distinct elements. These include recognition of a need or problem, an information search, an evaluation of alternatives, a purchase decision, and post-purchase behavior (Sahu et al., 2020). Each facet of the process is subject to influence by the unique internal and psychological factors associated with individual consumers. The recognition of needs is highly influenced by the socioeconomic background of potential consumers. Certain products that are not presumed to be necessities are not considered by individuals within the middle or lower classes (Malkoc & Zauberman, 2018). Similarly, many services and products may only be seen as a need for particular cultural consumer communities. Information search may be more susceptible to influence in relation to the age of consumers (Pousttchi & Dehnert, 2018). Younger buyers are more likely to explore relevant information regarding products, much like their more adept observation of alternatives.
Conclusion
Socioeconomic, internal, and psychological factors are also incredibly present in the steps of the purchase decision and post-purchase behavior. Individual psychology can define numerous factors such as the frequency of a purchase, the decision to increase the effort of a purchase in order to reduce price, or the longevity of the product after it is bought (Iyer et al., 2020. Once again, it is vital to note that both psychological and internal factors are often influenced by external forces such as social, economic, cultural, and other elements (Ozkara & Bagozzi, 2021). The individual influence on consumer decision-making can be summarized by four features which are motivation, learning, perception, and attitudes or belief systems. These factors directly relate to the steps of the decision-making process (Lăzăroiu et al., 2020). Motivation can directly contribute to the ways in which a consumer perceives their need or problem and the contributing products that can solve them.
Reference List
Andrews, F. M. (2017). ‘Social and psychological factors which influence the creative process.’ In Perspectives in creativity. Routledge. pp. 117-145.
Iyer, G. R., Blut, M., Xiao, S. H., & Grewal, D. (2020). ‘Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review.’ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 384–404.
Lăzăroiu, G., Neguriţă, O., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Mitran, P.C. (2020). ‘Consumers’ Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.’ Frontiers in Psychology, 15.
Malkoc, S. A., & Zauberman, G. (2018). ‘Psychological analysis of consumer intertemporal decisions.’ Consumer Psychology Review, 2, 97-113.
Ozkara, B. Y., & Bagozzi, R. (2021). ‘The use of event related potentials brain methods in the study of Conscious and unconscious consumer decision making processes.’ Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58.
Páez-Gallego, J., Gallardo-López, J. A., López-Noguero, F., & Rodrigo-Moriche, M. P. (2020). ‘Analysis of the relationship between psychological well-being and decision making in adolescent students.’ Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1195.
Pousttchi, K., & Dehnert, M. (2018). ‘Exploring the digitalization impact on consumer decision-making in retail banking.’ Electronic Markets, 28, 265–286.
Roetzel, P. G. (2019). ‘Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development.’ Business Research, 12, 479–522.
Sahu, A. K., Padhy, R. K., & Dhir, A. (2020). ‘Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: A systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory.’ Australasian Marketing Journal, 28, 145-159.
Yu, M. (2020). ‘Psychological Mechanism of Consumers in Brand Building of economic trade.’ Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29, 676.