Introduction
Employees are the most critical components of business organizations because they are involved in all organizational processes and advancement towards the ultimate goals. Therefore, employees who feel appreciated are more satisfied with their work and automatically put in more effort to deliver on their obligations. However, organizational processes are repetitive and involve performing strenuous tasks. Additionally, employees deal with several other issues that expose them to stress and conditions that interfere with their careers. As a result, they might exhibit withdrawal and diminished motivation due to increased difficulty to perform tasks. Subsequently, the implications may reflect in the organization’s performance as it affects work processes and the institution’s functioning. Hence, employee disengagement is a significant limitation to progressive development and can substantially harm organizational outcomes.
Diminished motivation and reduced staff engagement are detrimental factors to business institutions because they are not readily noticeable. Compared to issues like staff shortages and the lack of particular skill sets among employees, disengagement can affect high-performing teams over time due to dynamic organizational factors. Nevertheless, human resource managers are responsible for identifying aspects of reduced engagement in their staff and its indicators since their role entails ensuring a supportive environment where all members thrive. However, managers should acknowledge that several factors can cause disengagement and investigate the effectiveness of various approaches when faced with particular issues. Hence, the best solution to dealing with disengagement is informing managers of its attributes, enhancing their training in the identification of associated indicators, and providing them with resources to enhance employee satisfaction and maximize engagement.
Literature Review
Engagement is a critical concept of management because it describes the levels to which staff in an organization can sacrifice toward achieving the organization’s goals. Engaged employees are absorbed and enthusiastic about their work responsibilities (Albrecht et al., 2018). As a result, they significantly invest their energy, emotions, cognitive abilities, and time in performing their duties. However, due to the complicated nature of organizational environments and external pressure, employees can become demotivated over time, especially when they do not find value in their obligations or face difficulties in completing assigned tasks. Nevertheless, managers who are familiar with the common causes of staff disengagement are better positioned to apply reliable solutions to enhance motivation. Therefore, learning how to identify issues that can interfere with motivation is a critical managerial skill to ascertain development.
Causes of Employee Disengagement
Work engagement is a desirable quality for employees because it coincides with high creativity levels, client satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. According to Bakker and Albrecht (2018), engagement is a state of mind under the influence of both internal and external human factors. Therefore, employee engagement can fluctuate in individuals, across given times, and in different situations. For example, some workers are more engaged in the morning while others maximize their engagement during hourly episodes when they are given challenging tasks (Bakker & Albrecht, 2018). However, a significant number of employees are influenced by the availability of resources to complete their tasks. As a result, they exhibit less enthusiasm for their work with limited access to supportive resources (Albrecht et al., 2018). Nevertheless, initiatives like teamwork enhance employee participation and engagement in responsibilities. Therefore, assessing the contributors and barriers to work engagement can help managers to limit its influence.
Employee engagement is also associated with the perceived value of job responsibilities and the rewards that come with completing tasks. According to Van Wingerden and Van der Stoep, (2018), meaningful job responsibilities are positively related to job performance because it encourages employees to use their strengths, become innovative, and put in more energy to deliver as expected. Additionally, employees appreciate recognition after achieving certain milestones as it encourages them to do more and surpass their previous records (Meijerink et al., 2020). In other words, posting employees in positions where they are overqualified or underqualified can lead to diminished engagement as it might erode the perceived value of responsibilities. Therefore, managers are expected to design work schedules that are appropriate for their staff’s skillset while seeking opportunities for gradual career development (Van Wingerden & Van der Stoep, 2018). This ensures that employees face tasks they can handle using readily available resources. Hence, continuously performing tasks and advancing can help maximize engagement.
Implications of Worker Disengagement
Diminished motivation and employee disengagement can cause several issues in organizations because it limits delivery and stalls goal achievement. For example, unenthusiastic employees can influence the work environment and discourage others from putting in effort as desired. Moreover, disengaged employees disadvantage others as they might not produce results in their projects or deliver by the deadline (Albrecht et al., 2018). In addition, they may escape performing tasks thus increasing others’ workload. Eventually, these issues can lead to commotion within organizations and high turnover rates. As a result, an organization can lose reliable personnel due to poor performance and an unfavorable work climate because of workers’ lack of engagement (Albrecht et al., 2018). In addition, disengaged employees are not responsive to change in organizations as shifts may introduce difficulties.
Worker disengagement can also have adverse implications on administrators and officials in leadership positions. There are several reasons why management can collide with staff in organizations. For example, staff might conflict with management over compensation matters, adverse working conditions, and unrealistic demands by administrators (Milhem et al., 2019). However, staff disengagement is a major cause of conflicts between employees and managers in organizations because of failure to deliver on responsibilities as expected. Since managers are liable for employees’ performance and their behaviors toward achieving organizational outcomes, they are subjected to increased pressure, especially from investors and other shareholders who might consider them underachievers. Subsequently, an organization may experience high rates of turnover since both managers and employees may quit their jobs or lack the motivation to pursue strenuous activities.
Possible Solutions to Employee Disengagement
Employees also appreciate work environments where they can develop, and achieve self-efficacy and higher standards of practice. Lee et al. (2019) point out that ensuring open communication, proactive organizational behaviors, and innovation can improve workers’ performance and drive an organization in the right direction. However, diving deeper into career development by offering supervisory coaching can enable managers to advance their employees’ capabilities while opening up opportunities for professional advancement (Lee et al., 2019). Therefore, occasionally offering employee development opportunities, training employees in diverse fields, and exposing them to high-standard industry practices can encourage their participation in uplifting the organization. Moreover, training and development assure job security and higher retention rates, meaning that employees will be more focused and accountable for their actions with a vision of a better future.
The attributes of an organization’s leadership also play a major role in determining employees’ engagement levels. Decuypere & Schaufeli (2020) propose that positive leadership approaches solicit favorable leadership behaviors which influence employee participation using direct and indirect pathways. Managers can induce cooperation from employees indirectly by establishing appropriate work characteristics and motivating them psychologically. Similarly, managers can indirectly encourage engagement in staff members through emotional contagion, social exchange, and role modeling (Decuypere & Schaufeli, 2020). Milhem et al. (2019) suggest that transformational leadership can enhance managers’ emotional intelligence and allow them to empathize and associate better with their employees. In turn, positive staff-management relationships translate to open communication, more efficient problem-solving, innovation, and enthusiasm toward completing tasks and advancing the organization’s initiatives.
An organization’s working environment can also have positive or adverse implications on their dedication and perceptions of the work. An institutional climate that shows concern for employee welfare and cares for their well-being encourages a similar reaction from staff members (Saks, 2022). Moreover, positive organizational climates involve employees in critical decision-making, designing flexible working programs, and contribute to their work-life balance. According to Saks (2022), employees thrive in environments where they are aware of what transpires and are allowed to voice their opinions. Hence, when administrators do not share information with employees, they may feel detached, thus facilitating disengagement. Moreover, being dishonest with employees can create a culture of mistrust among employees and the administration, thus eroding their relationship. Subsequently, staff members will be less motivated to deliver on their tasks.
Employees are also exposed to detrimental organizational factors that can deteriorate their relationships, limit their interactions, and decrease their comfort. Consequently, these issues can introduce setbacks such as disengagement and reduced productivity (Motyka, 2018). Organizational staffs constantly interact in enclosed settings, allowing them to establish social bonds and personal relationships. However, conflicts due to failure to deliver during projects, quarrels, bias, discrimination, unfairness, and social issues are sometimes inevitable because of varied individuals’ judgments, preferences, and opinions (Motyka, 2018). Additionally, reduced chemistry and the lack of collaboration among team members can result in disengagement. Employees who do not occasionally interact, share ideas, and know each other at more personal levels may feel disconnected and left out. In the long run, the disconnection can present issues as employees will not be enthusiastic about their work and may find it difficult to relate to others.
Apart from work-related issues, employees also suffer from personal problems that interfere with their contentment and ability to deliver on obligations. For example, some staff members support other individuals or have financial obligations such as home mortgages and loans that alleviate their stress. As a result, they may show reduced concentration at work, fatigue, irritability, and decreased motivation (Lizano et al., 2019). Thus, it is critical to look out for these indicators since they can facilitate disengagement and affect workflows in organizations. However, Lizano et al. (2019) suggest that tapping into workers’ spirituality can have significant effects on their satisfaction with life, dedication, and work commitment as religion can assist staff members to come to terms with their situation. Nevertheless, it is critical to factor in additional solutions to curb personal issues among staff including establishing professional social groups where individuals can share their issues and obtain emotional support (Lizano et al., 2019). Moreover, introducing employee welfare departments can assist organizations to address critical employee issues and offer assistance. In turn, employees will be better positioned to focus on their tasks with open mindsets, free from lifestyle stressors.
Critique
The literature review sheds light on the causes, implications, and potential solutions to worker disengagement in organizations. According to the literature analysis, employee engagement is a critical characteristic of successful business firms because it reflects the capacity of staff members to deliver as required and surpass expectations. Disengagement can result from monotonous tasks, tedious work, or repetitive jobs. Additionally, personal concerns such as job insecurity, financial problems, conflicts between employees, and the lack of self-efficacy can contribute to reduced enthusiasm. Hence, the review has several strengths as it provides a detailed explanation of causes, implications, and solutions to staff disengagement. However, some weaknesses of the available literature are that they do not state the role employees should play to ensure that they enhance their motivation and ensure that they do not disappoint managers. In addition, they do not provide solutions to limit the disengagement of particular staff members from influencing others. Therefore, researchers should address these gaps as the information is critical to leaders dealing with increased disengagement in their institutions.
The arguments provided by researchers and scholars about the need to curb worker disengagement before it interferes with productivity are convincing as they explain several adverse implications of diminished motivation. Moreover, the solutions examined are feasible and reliable since they can help managers identify and deal with disengagement. For example, management’s relationship with staff can encourage or discourage cooperation. In addition, staffs react positively to institutions that focus on their welfare, respond to their needs, and involve them in decision-making. Moreover, development opportunities are critical to maximizing engagement as it allows employees to apply the newly learned skills and add value through their contributions. Thus, leaders should familiarize themselves with these factors to enhance engagement and maximize productivity.
The literature is also reliable as it considers the controllable and unavoidable factors that interfere with workers’ engagement. The lack of a supportive environment is one of the factors that limit organizations from sustaining employee engagement. Staff members persevere through various challenges and are exposed to dynamic factors. Therefore, they deserve organizational frameworks that occasionally inquire about their welfare, acknowledge their feedback, offer quick solutions, and provide development opportunities. Moreover, it is critical to assess whether employees are appropriately placed since their work obligations can influence their performance. For example, employees appreciate work environments that present manageable challenges. Otherwise, a worker might become bored with simple work or experience numerous issues completing complex projects. Therefore, striking a balance between what duties to assign employees might present issues, especially with recruits. However, managers can make better decisions by continuously evaluating their employees’ abilities and conducting a performance appraisal. Moreover, it is vital to establish positive relationships between administrators and subordinates since it allows open communication, sharing of ideas, and aligning staff initiatives to the organization’s goals. Managing these factors effectively can ensure increased motivation and sustainable employee engagement.
Conclusion
Staff engagement is a core feature of successful organizations because it drives productivity and encourages workers to become more innovative in finding solutions to challenges. However, several factors, including leadership approaches, interpersonal relationships, availability of resources, and personal issues can interfere with engagement, thus negatively influencing productivity. Disengaged staff members can affect the morale of others and disrupt an institution’s workflow. Therefore, organizations might experience high turnover and an inability to achieve their goals. However, engaging staff in decision-making, establishing a culture of trust, offering training opportunities, assuring job security, and catering to personal staff issues can allow them to feel more appreciated and in turn, put in more effort to ensure the organization’s success. Human resource managers play a crucial role in ensuring the wellness and cooperation of employees. Hence, they should have access to resources that facilitate surveillance, evaluation, and problem-solving to help them deal with disengagement.
References
Albrecht, S., Breidahl, E., & Marty, A. (2018). Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement. Career Development International. 23(2), 48-87.
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International. 23(1) 4-11.
Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. (7th ed.). CQ Press.
Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69-95.
Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257-282.
Lizano, E. L., Godoy, A. J., & Allen, N. (2019). Spirituality and worker well-being: examining the relationship between spirituality, job burnout, and work engagement. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social thought, 38(2), 197-216.
Meijerink, J., Bos-Nehles, A., & de Leede, J. (2020). How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: The mediating role of job crafting. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(22), 2893-2918.
Milhem, M., Muda, H., & Ahmed, K. (2019). The effect of perceived transformational leadership style on employee engagement: The mediating effect of leader’s emotional intelligence. Foundations of Management, 11(1), 33-42. Web.
Motyka, B. (2018). Employee engagement and performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management and Economics, 54(3), 227-244.
Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835.
Van Wingerden, J., & Van der Stoep, J. (2018). The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance. PloS One, 13(6), e0197599.