Introduction
Animal rights protection is a critical problem in Pakistan nowadays. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and legal systems work to protect the interests of animals, including elephants. This paper examines the applicability of the Ordinance Act of Pakistan, the Animal Cruelty Act, and pertinent constitutional provisions on animal welfare, with a focus on elephants.
This paper’s thesis assesses the level of education and the laws implemented in Pakistan regarding animal rights for elephants. It proposes better policies to prevent the eradication of this voiceless species. The state of elephants in Pakistan is of great importance to consider among animal rights law organizations and their efforts to prevent such illegal takes by appealing for stronger legal protections and greater ethical involvement.
Thesis: In this context, the Islamabad High Court’s continued confirmation of the first-of-its-kind animal rights case marks a paradigm shift in the legal sphere, with greater recognition of animals as sentient beings warranting protection and consideration. This paves the way for another new phase of the animal rights fight in the country.
Road Map
An exploration of animal rights begins with a brief introduction to the treatment of animals in Islamic culture. Following the background information, the paper will transition into the current legal acts at play, beginning with the Ordinance Act of Pakistan, where its role and its challenges in protecting animal rights are discussed. The Animal Cruelty Act is analyzed for its effectiveness and any possible improvements. This essay will discuss the Animal Ordinance Act of Pakistan, following the introduction. The subsequent sections will comprehensively cover the Act’s provisions related to the welfare of animals, including elephants.
Then, it will examine the Animal Cruelty Act, the special law passed to include elephant cruelty, and analyze its strengths and weaknesses in addressing the problem. After that, the essay shall elaborate on Pakistan’s constitutional framework regarding animal welfare, as well as the fundamental principles and provisions that directly affect it. I then offer my personal analysis on the issue, which I find particularly moving because of my own experiences witnessing animal cruelty.
The conclusion will synthesize the findings and present recommendations to improve the animal rights campaign and relevant legislation, especially regarding elephants in Pakistan. The constitutional perspective on animal welfare in Pakistan, which is taking shape through the intricate law-making process, is another key factor that needs to be examined. Through critical analysis and discussion, the intention is to build a persuasive case for promoting animal-improving legislation with a strong emphasis on inclusivity and complexity, since animals lack a voice to speak for themselves.
Background of Topic
In Pakistan, the first law created to defend animal rights was the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1890, which has not been amended since 1937. Though the law is comprehensive, Pakistan has failed to enforce it, leaving its impact on animal welfare to be minuscule. Compared with other issues currently at the forefront of Pakistani politics, animal welfare hasn’t proven to be a priority, even though the country is a member of the World Organization for Animal Health.
Throughout the years, Pakistan has passed various laws regarding animal welfare: one protects domestic animals from maltreatment, and another ensures basic security for all animals. The Punjab Poultry Production rules (2017) and Punjab Animals Slaughter Control Act (1963) regulate the slaughter and transport of livestock, and the Northern Areas Wildlife Preservation Act protects wild animals. Though animal cruelty is pervasive throughout Pakistan, efforts do exist to ameliorate the situation. Though these laws exist, their effectiveness is diminished due to a lack of enforcement.
Historically, many Islamic countries have had issues regarding animal cruelty. Though this paper focuses specifically on Pakistan, the following section will explain the history of animal treatment in terms of the Quran and how the religious doctrine has been used to defend animal rights. Islamic law consistently emphasizes the importance of humane treatment, particularly regarding the consumption of meat. Halal methods ensure that the killing of animals for meat is performed humanely; if maltreatment occurs throughout the handling or slaughtering process, the meat is considered forbidden.
Killing for any reason other than consumption, such as sports hunting and animal baiting, is also strictly prohibited by Islamic law. Islamic religious texts also provide strong backing for animal welfare. In many verses throughout the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna, the Prophet Mohammed encourages individuals to treat all beings with respect. In numerous cases, the Quran expresses that humans can use animals for labor; however, humans must reciprocate this interaction by practicing humane treatment:
“We have made animals subject to you, that ye may be grateful.”
Moreover, the emphasis on animal welfare proliferates throughout the Hadith and Sunna. In the case of mistreatment of elephants, who are usually held captive through traumatizing manners, the hadith explicitly condemns their bondage by asserting that “[I]t is a great sin for man to imprison those animals which are in his power.” (Hadith: Muslim). Islam, therefore, demonstrates kindness towards all beings, providing a legal backing for lawyers and animal welfare advocates to argue against the current unjust treatment of animals in Pakistan.
In the landmark case that centered around the mistreatment of Kaavan, an elephant in captivity at the Marghazar Zoo, the High Court of Islamabad ultimately affirmed that animals, as sentient beings, possess natural rights. In the first of the 67-page ruling, Athar Minallah, jurist of the Supreme Court, importantly quotes Prophet Mohammed,
“A good deed done to an animal is as meritorious as a good deed done to a human being, while an act of cruelty to an animal is as bad as an act of cruelty to a human being.”
In various legal, political, and social institutions in Pakistan, religion serves as a guide. The High Court of Islamabad’s verdict exemplifies the use of religion to advance animal welfare efforts. In the following sections, the effect of this verdict and the court’s affirmation of it are explored, along with the achievements and challenges in animal rights in Pakistan. Initiating such an event contradicts prevailing perceptions of the law, revealing that ethics plays a leading role in judicial assessments.
Once the initial decision of the High Court of Islamabad is passed, the court continues to confirm it, as it has for a long time, showing that animal rights have their backing. For the following theses, the writer might need clarification, supplementation, or reiteration to make the material easier to grasp and appreciate. The moral standing of the judiciary became apparent to the public with the rise of the Enlightenment, when animals began to be regarded as sentient beings whose interests should take precedence over all others.
The repeated calls from the Pakistan High Court at different times underscore the need for stronger animal rights advocacy in Pakistan. Those instruments provide advocates with the jurisdictional foundation and the power of precedent that can support even more effective reforms, such as amendments to laws/enforcement, and awareness campaigns. The formal endorsement from the court enhances the legitimacy and efficacy of animal rights enterprises, and it may create a favorable environment for genuine change.
The court articulates this perception by noting that past laws are being amended to benefit animals. This evidence shows that the principle of human rights is shifting progressively towards a broader and more complete concept. Ethically, judicial opinions reflect society’s recognition of the moral responsibility it owes to animals, as customary human-centric legal systems are increasingly challenged.
The Ordinance Act of Pakistan
The Animal Protection Act of Pakistan (1860) defined the basic principles for protecting animals in various areas. It outlines how the government should address animal cruelty, regulate the transportation and slaughter of animals, and establish animal welfare committees. Although the Act carries many measures to facilitate its implementation and enforcement, problems such as a lack of resources and coordination gaps among the related authorities remain.
Elephants also require protection under the Ordinance Act, but specific attention should be given to those elephants used for entertainment and commercial purposes. The inclusion of stipulations and regulations has been questioned, raising concerns about loopholes that could still allow the mistreatment of elephants in captivity. In this section, the advantages and disadvantages of the Ordinance Act concerning elephant welfare and licensing, as well as other conservation opportunities and penalties for violations, are thoroughly analyzed.
The issue of elephants being used for entertainment, for example, in circuses or on rides, raises ethical concerns about proper treatment, living conditions, and the elephants’ welfare. Although the Ordinance Act prohibits torturing, including elephants, the absence of precise guidelines and monitoring mechanisms opens room for exploitation and cruel treatment. Cultural habits, economic interests, and legal systems also bring more complications to the situation.
Bridging Gaps and Challenges in the Elephant Cruelty
The Animal Cruelty Act has the primary goal of dealing with just the worst types of animal cruelty. It depicts prohibitions like starvation, killing, and forgetting, making a clear distinction between the banned actions and prescribed sanctions. Still, the question of how far the Act could reach and the enforcement mechanisms leave some doubts concerning the effectiveness of the Act in fighting the structural problems of animal exploitation and abuse.
Regarding elephants, the Animal Cruelty Act establishes the legal requirements for prosecuting individuals or entities who engage in activities that may harm these remarkable animals. Aspects of physical abuse, inadequate living conditions, and improper handling may be pursued following this Act, thus meaning that a way is opened towards punishing offenders. Nonetheless, difficulties in evidence collection, proof of intent, and judicial monitoring will pose significant obstacles to justice for mistreated elephants.
Besides, the Act’s penalties, crucial for deterrence, do not necessarily reach the root causes of animal cruelty. Socio-economic factors, knowledge gaps, and cultural mindsets often increase the likelihood of exploitation. Therefore, whereas legal provisions are imperative, there is a need to include education, advocacy, and community engagement as strategies to promote compassion and respect for all living beings, including elephants. The misuse of elephants has long existed in society, creating the need to re-evaluate the systems put in place to ensure that they are protected from extreme exploitation.
Constitutional Mandates and Moral Narratives
The Constitution of Pakistan, the country’s supreme law, contains the fundamental principles and rights shared by all, including human and non-human beings. Although the explicit provisions concerning animal rights are relatively narrow, judicial interpretations and precedents highlight the necessity of the state’s and society’s treatment of animals. The principle of “non-human dignity,” rooted in constitutional jurisprudence, recognizes that animals are inherently worthy and deserve legal recognition and protection. This principle is frequently invoked in cases challenging exploitation and cruelty towards animals, indicating a movement towards recognizing and respecting animals as legitimate subjects with legal rights and entitlements.
On the other hand, applying constitutional principles to implementable plans and practices remains incomplete. Interpretation and enforcement are some functions of the judiciary, yet these need to be clarified to be more distinct. Besides, legal reforms on the sector-specific laws that align with constitutional mandates, such as animal rights provisions, are also needed to bridge the gap between rhetoric and reality. The approach to solving the problem of elephant exploitation requires a massive task force to ensure adequate follow-up of implementation.
Learning from Global Best Practices
We will examine various cases and compare the international standards framework to enhance our understanding of effective animal rights advocacy and legislation. Countries like India, which have their own Wildlife Protection Acts and robust legal frameworks, advocate for the total protection of elephants and other animals. Yet again, organizations such as The Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries and the Asian Elephant Alliance are evidence of joint efforts in conservation, rehabilitation, and improved treatment of elephants. By examining these achievements, Pakistan can draw essential measures to improve the country’s animal welfare situation. Partnerships among governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, academia, and civic associations are critical to implementing legislation, raising public awareness, and fostering a culture of compassion.
Personal Analysis
The High Court of Islamabad’s ruling showed a tangible improvement in the fight against animal cruelty. Kaavan’s case propelled the issue onto the international stage, where civil rights activists and celebrities worldwide spoke out about the elephant’s captivity. Some considered Kaavan to be “a beacon of hope” for the future of animal rights. The case attracted the attention it deserved, served as a catalyst for future reforms, and established a transformative precedent for future animal rights cases. I believe this case indicated a shift in public opinion that would later lead to further reforms the following year.
In December 2022, Pakistan established a new curriculum for primary schools centered on animal rights. The course covers treating animals humanely and properly caring for pets. Along with this course, the Pakistani government approved various other policies regarding animal welfare, including a ban on testing and a combined fine and jail term for those who commit offenses against animals. Outside organizations have greatly influenced the movement for increased rights, with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) being particularly impactful in driving forward the new curriculum.
These 2022 policies demonstrated increased awareness of animal welfare. Still, I personally believe it is not enough. Though Kaavan was saved due to the domestic and international efforts, Noor Jahan was not. Instead of serving as a “beacon of hope,” she acted as a sorrowful reminder of the continued suffering of animals in Pakistan. In her case, the help arrived too late. Years of abuse and neglect left her in an unrecoverable state at a stage in her life where elephants are normally at their healthiest. These conditions show that although Pakistan has generally improved, a broader transformation in public opinion and policy will be needed to advance animal welfare.
If we look at Pakistan during the past years, we can see that it has come under scrutiny regarding the welfare of animals, particularly elephants. The incident involving Noor Jahan, the elephant at the zoo, was one of the main issues discussed. Not only does this raise the issue of how animals are treated, but it also highlights how society approaches animal rights and welfare. Noor Jahan’s case, who was kept at Islamabad Zoo and spent decades there, was an example of how animals are being treated in Pakistan. Her deplorable living conditions were reported both domestically and internationally, raising widespread outrage.
The treatment of animals in Pakistan is not getting the compassion and respect that they deserve, especially when we look at elephants. According to Islamic teachings, which call us to be more compassionate and kinder towards all beings, including animals, there is a discrepancy between practice and the religion’s view of animal treatment. This discourse sheds light on the community, raises awareness of animal welfare, and highlights the need for more education on the treatment of animals. The primary school curriculum will not be enough to change people’s mentality towards animals entirely.
The incident involving Noor Jahan reminds us that there is still much work to be done to advance animal rights. The plea for kinder treatment towards animals must be amplified throughout the country and abroad. As seen in Noor Jahan’s case and in previous animal rights cases, international media increased pressure on Pakistan to improve animal welfare. However, this fight for increased animal rights has broader implications.
Various authors have analyzed the parallels between the treatment of animals and the treatment of vulnerable populations in Pakistan. Women and children have also suffered immensely in recent events, including an incident close to the Karachi Zoo, where 16 women and children were killed after hundreds of people stampeded into a factory building to get food. These events demonstrate a belief that violence towards vulnerable populations asserts strength, which is extremely dangerous.
I believe this quote by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, a conservationist, encapsulates the future response that Pakistan should adopt to improve its treatment of all beings, not just animals: “I think as a nation, we need to understand that if animals are not living a dignified life, it translates into also how we see other human beings.” I believe that the issue of animal cruelty in Pakistan is greater than meets the eye, and it will require much time to fix; however, when the lives of animals are at risk, institutions and people must work at a quicker pace to save the lives of these innocent animals. A mixture of policy, proper enforcement, and increased public awareness will be needed to accomplish this, and I will discuss this further in the following section.
Recommendations
The recommendations addressing the research findings and analyses are included in the section provided. They intend to offer tips on improving elephant protection measures in line with Pakistani law. These recommendations comprise statutory changes, enforcement tactics, educational programs, and mechanisms for interaction among governmental institutions, nonprofit associations, local communities, and other civil society venues. The goal is to promote a comprehensive elephant welfare system that puts humanization first, is grounded in conservation principles, and addresses coexistence issues ethically and sustainably.
The first step to preserve the existence of elephants is to strictly enforce existing laws, such as the Ordinance Act and the Animal Cruelty Act. Such a plan would encompass creating and fielding task forces to combat offenses against wildlife, such as poaching, the trade in wildlife products, and the abuse of elephants. The strict penalties that will be deliberately communicated to the public through harsh sentencing of convicted criminals are powerful weapons that will serve as a deterrent and a message that committing such crimes will be intolerable.
As the Department of Nature is left free of human interference, conservation should be given preference for elephants. The need for financial and material resources to implement plans for habitat restoration, anti-poaching actions, and community-based conservation programs is a foundation for success. Partnering with local communities and conservation agencies can thus be the starting point for developing sustainable conservation plans that benefit not only elephants but also humans. Media campaigns on TV, information, and community outreach will sensitize the public to the need to conserve elephants, ensure fair treatment, and raise awareness of the effects of poaching. The community’s affluence arises from their being educated, likely to initiate conservation activities, and playing the role of information providers and complaint handlers regarding wildlife cruelty.
Along with the recent laws restricting the custody of elephants comes the need for increased provisions for the legal evaluation of cases. Humane farming is made up of lots of things, like keeping animals alive and allowing them to live in humane conditions while doing away with abusive practices. For example, this might include tying an animal and maintaining a chicken in a cramped pen for a long time. The loopholes will be closed by adopting the elephant welfare amendments into existing laws or by enacting new acts. Joint research and monitoring programs are relevant because they provide more practical information for understanding elephants’ behavior, life, and rules in their natural habitat.
Through a partnership among government officials, researchers, and nonprofit conservation organizations, we can obtain the data needed to develop our strategies for systems, resources, and their management. Information will be obtained from organizations such as government experts and environmental non-governmental organizations and used to develop evidence-based management strategies and conservation procedures. Building this partnership among the government, research institutions, and non-governmental organizations involved in managing this biodiversity will help generate reliable data to serve as the backbone of the practical implementation of the evidence-based conservation program.
The development of networks among government agencies, research centers, and organizations focused on nature conservation yields crucial information that enables the formulation of well-informed conservation actions and forward-looking management strategies. Utilizing communication among government agencies, research institutions, and non-governmental conservation organizations can help us gather facts about the situation to inform the design of conservation interventions and management approaches. On the same note, dynamic monitoring is equally effective at detecting threats and challenges elephants face.
Islamic Context Regarding Animal Rights
Animal rights and cruelty to animals that are housed not only in people’s homes but also in zoos and circuses — particularly those that use cages — are major concerns in today’s culture. There is a discussion about the problem of hunting animals in forest enclosures where the animals have little chance of surviving. Meanwhile, 1400 years ago, Islamic law established the ethical treatment of animals. Animal rights are protected under Islam by both the Koran and the Prophet’s hadiths.
In Islam, mercy is extended to all living things, not just to humans. Islam promotes treating animals with kindness and states that mistreatment of animals can result in damnation, even before modern animal rights activists started actively participating in society. Islam forbids the mistreatment of animals, as Islamic law establishes the guidelines for killing animals for food. It demands that the animal experience as little pain as possible. Islam states that the instruments used for killing must be extremely sharp and that neither the animals nor their surroundings should be allowed to see the instruments. Islam forbids the slaughter of one animal in front of another. There has never been such compassion for animals in history.
The following ideas summarize how Islam has established proper care for animals. First of all, according to Islamic law, domestic or farm animals must have access to enough food, clean water, and a safe place to live. Second, the prophet prohibited forcing animals to fight each other for amusement and stated that animals may not be tortured. Thirdly, it is forbidden in Islam to shoot animals or birds as targets. Thus, the laws of Islam help to preserve the life and decent conditions of animals.
Conclusion
Appraising the animal rights movement and the law concerning elephants in Pakistan reveals a mixed picture, with both challenges and opportunities. The Animal Protection Ordinance Act and the Animal Cruelty Act serve as the basis for animal protection, but their effectiveness and implementation schemes should be improved. The non-human dignity principles demonstrated in the Constitution provide a moral impetus to acknowledge and protect animal rights, thereby spurring concerted efforts in policy formulation, education, and advocacy.
The government should not be the only ones to give a voice to the voiceless; people should also transcend the law’s “past” and turn this idea of social appropriateness into a high ethical compass: the necessity of empathy and coexistence. By integrating moral considerations, scientific evidence, and global standards of care, Pakistan can work towards a more compassionate society where elephants are no longer considered commodities but rather sentient beings that deserve dignity and protection.
Therefore, in the end, the well-being of the elephants in Pakistan is a complex issue that requires cooperation among the different sides: policymakers, advocacy groups, and the general public. However, existing laws are the foundation on which animal protection stands, broadening enforcement, raising awareness, and considering ethics within the legal system.
References
1996 Glob. Envtl. L. Ann. 15 (1996). Environmental Law of Pakistan.
8 U. Rich. L. Rev. 201 (1973-1974). Animal Cruelty Laws: The Case for Reform.
Abubakar, M., Manzoor, S., & Iqbal, A., Introductory Chapter: Animal Welfare—Global Perspective, InTech EBooks (2018).
Ahmad, Sana & Ali, Zulfiqar & AayzaNemat, & Sikander, Syeda & Hussein, Zahra & Saleem, Kiran, The study of public perception for captive animals at Lahore zoo, Pakistan. 25 Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 509-513 (2015).
Bansiddhi, P., Brown, J. L., & Thitaram, C., Welfare Assessment and Activities of Captive Elephants in Thailand, 10 Animals, 919 (2020).
Bansiddhi, P., Brown, J. L., Thitaram, C., Punyapornwithaya, V., & Nganvongpanit, K., Elephant Tourism in Thailand: aReview of Animal Welfare Practices and Needs, 23 Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1–14 (2019).
Dishha Bagchi, Pakistan mending its wildlife abuser image-with animal rights syllabus in children’s textbooks ThePrint (2022).
Ehtasham, L., Sherani, S. H., Younas, K., Izbel, U., Khan, A. H., Bahadur, A., & Akbar, A., A review of the status of environmental impact assessment in Pakistan, 18 Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 314–318 (2021).
Fennell, D. A., An animal welfare literacy framework for tourism, 96 Annals of Tourism Research, (2022).
Habib, M. A., & Lawrence, B. B., The Qur’an: A verse translation. Liveright (2024).
Hadid, D., & Sattar, A., The fate of a teenage zoo elephant in Pakistan was tragic – and a symbol of much more. NPR (2023).
Haleem, A., Khan, M. I., & Khan, S., Conceptualizing a framework linking halal supply chain management with sustainability: An India centric study, 1 Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1-18 (2020).
Hussain, A., Sial, A. Q., & Usman, A., The Study of Animal Rights and Related Laws in Pakistan, 6 Global Legal Studies Review, 96–103 (2021).
Islamabad Wildlife Management Board through its Chairman Versus Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad through its Mayor & 4 others. (W.P. No.1155/2019).
Miller, V., Giles, J., Khan, M., Mumtaz, H., Savelli, A., & Grosjean, G., Climate-smart agriculture in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, Cgspace.cgiar.org (2021).
Mr. Syed Sikandar Shah Momand, Ms. F. M., Mr. Sami Ur Rahman. Legislative framework on occupational health and safety: a case study of Pakistan, 5 Pakistan Journal of International Affairs (2022).
Mughal, M. A., Rights of Animals in Pakistan: Constitution and Law. SSRN Electronic Journal (2020).
Pallota, N., After groundbreaking animal rights ruling, islamabad high court continues to affirm original decision. Animal Legal Defense Fund (2021).
Rahman, S., ‘Religion and animal welfare—an Islamic perspective’, 7 Animals, 11 (2017).
Shermin de Silva, Ruppert, K., Knox, J., Davis, E. O., U. Sameera Weerathunga, & Glikman, J. A., Experiences and emotional responses of farming communities living with Asian Elephants in Southern Sri Lanka, 14 Trees, Forests and People, (2023).
Srinivasaiah, N. M., Vaidyanathan, S., Sukumar, R., & Sinha, A., The Rurban Elephant: Behavioural Ecology of Asian Elephants in Response to Large-Scale Land Use Change in a Human-Dominated Landscape in Peri-Urban Southern India, 289–310 (2021).
Ullah, I., & Kim, D. Y., A model of collaborative governance for community-based trophy-hunting programs in developing countries, 18 Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 145-160 (2020).
Usman, A., Hassan, M., Rehman, Z. U., & Sial, A. Q., Legal framework in aid of biological diversity and statutory deficiencies in Pakistan. 84 Brazilian Journal of Biology (2022).
Zahid., The aspects of legislation in environmental management: case study of Punjab province (Pakistan), 72 Pakistan Journal of Science (2020).
Zafar, M. B., & Sulaiman, A. A., CSR narrative under Islamic banking paradigm, 17 Social Responsibility Journal, 15-29 (2021).