Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms

Environmental ethics is centered on the ethical dilemmas arising from human interaction with the nonhuman domain. It investigates ways in which society can resolve different challenges that touch on ethics and the environment (Anyshchenko, 2019) There have been protracted ethical dilemmas relating to the scientific technologies in genetic engineering leading to the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Major ethical issues involving GMOs arise from their probable risk to human health and the environment.

The development of GMOs could be considered a positive development under the consequentialist view of environmental ethics. It advocates for the need for people to aim at generating the best outcomes from their rules or actions. The standard goal of consequentialism is to maximize the best-expected consequences.

On the contrary, the deontological perspective holds that the desire to maximize the good is not always suitable. There are instances where maximizing the good may push individuals to act in oppressive ways (Anyshchenko, 2019). The deontological viewpoint suggests that the consequentialist directions to environmental ethics in the use of GMOs may create problems, including the probable corporate dominance, damaging effect on traditional farming practices, and the ‘unnaturalness’ of the products. The deontological view requires individuals to consider principles, practices, rights, duties, or some blend of these, instead of focusing on maximizing the good.

Therefore, there is a need to focus on rights, especially in maintaining the environment. Accordingly, people have a right to an environment where there are assured of good health and well-being. The riding principle here is to avoid scientific approaches that may have unclear effects leading to the conclusion that GMOs should not be used. The best approach would require the conduct of sufficient tests to analyze all the probable risks and clarify their effects.

References

Anyshchenko, A. (2019). The precautionary principle in EU regulation of GMOs: Socio-economic considerations and ethical implications of biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32(5-6), 855–872.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, June 24). Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms. https://studycorgi.com/environmental-ethics-in-genetically-modified-organisms/

Work Cited

"Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms." StudyCorgi, 24 June 2023, studycorgi.com/environmental-ethics-in-genetically-modified-organisms/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms'. 24 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms." June 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/environmental-ethics-in-genetically-modified-organisms/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms." June 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/environmental-ethics-in-genetically-modified-organisms/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms." June 24, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/environmental-ethics-in-genetically-modified-organisms/.

This paper, “Environmental Ethics in Genetically Modified Organisms”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.