Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study

Introduction

Epidemiology is a scientific subject that assesses the elements and distribution of illness and injury in people groups through space and time. Epidemiologic methods refer to the various concepts applicable in finding the causes of diseases and other healthcare concerns in a community (Huremović, 2019). The epidemiologic models and systems serve a vast selection of purposes in disease examinations and healthcare research, including measuring the mortality and morbidity of a specific population, identifying the cause of a given health disorder, and examining the performance of analytic, healing, and precautionary measures (Huremović, 2019). Therefore, the prevention of infectious diseases is necessary to minimize the spread and consequences of such illnesses. This research focuses on epidemiologic concepts, theoretical frameworks, and study designs in the context of infectious diseases. It further aims to assess the epidemiology of contagious illnesses and recommend reducing virus spread and transmission.

Statement of the Problem

Infectious diseases are the primary cause of increased mortality and morbidity experienced in the current society. Their transmission is linked to human civilization, including animal domestication and urbanization. These factors led to the spread of viral infections and airborne bacteria, which are presently detrimental to human existence. Therefore, this research problem is significant since it clarifies the social context of the severity of infectious diseases, apart from assessing the probable methods of controlling viral spread and transmission.

Definitions of Disease Occurrence

Epidemiologists categorize illness cases and incidence of illness in a community as either epidemic and endemic. An Endemic is the regular event of infection in a group of people, whereas an epidemic is an unexpected and significant increase in a population’s condition. It can give a boost to an epidemic, a fast-developing occurrence of illness that upsets persons within a vast topographical zone (Huremović, 2019). For instance, when a small group of individuals is infected by influenza within a year in a big city, they are regarded as prevalent cases of the illness. Conversely, when the number of individuals influenced by the disease within a similar town escalates to significant winter stages, the occurrence has measured as an epidemic. Finally, if a new variation of the condition arises and distresses individuals globally, the occurrence is regarded as a pandemic.

Basic Tools of Epidemiology

A vast array of public healthcare concepts is available to help in illness investigation and wellness research. The key strategies include mapping, web-based reporting, and laboratory techniques. The methods help medical experts identify causes of health conditions, examine the mortality and morbidity of a specific population, understand the history and course of the disease, and assess the influences of analysis, therapy, and preventive frameworks of a public health course (Huremović, 2019). Epidemiologic concepts and tools offer empirical evidence to establish community health policies to enhance human wellness. Epidemiology is founded on two fundamental assumptions. First, illness is not regular, which means that several aspects impact developing the disease. Second, the research on inhabitants allows for identifying the causes and preventive measures like conditions (Huremović, 2019). Consequently, to explore sickness in people, epidemiologists depend on definitions and models of disease incidence and employ different apparatuses.

Mapping

The creation of a progressively refined geographical data structure (GIS) has delivered an innovative set of implements for community healthcare experts to observe and react to fitness concerns. These systems benefit in identifying contacts and cases, recognizing spatial tendencies, detecting disease groups, comparing a distinct set of spatial information, and examining numerical hypotheses (Rumpf et al., 2019). Regularly these studies are helped by the conception and plotting of data, delivered via web facilities or consumer interfaces. The GIS systems are used in geocoding, incorporating statistics causes, and cluster acknowledgment. Plotting of statistics is attained via dot graphs, choropleth registers, and gradient plots (Rumpf et al., 2019). Regular reflections cited in these encompass the seclusion of public health information, the arrangement of GIS analytics to consumers’ needs, incentives to make examination amenities available, and the system’s interoperability.

Laboratory Experiment

Laboratory testing is established by accepting the dissemination and grouping of genomic variations, strains, pigeonholes, and other pathogens’ molecular clusterings. In molecular epidemiology, the connection amongst segregates is frequently designed and communicated through phylogenetic diagrams. Conception tools for laboratory research often comprise phylogenetic examination and picturing abilities and background statistics using linked charts (Rumpf et al., 2019). The tools for this type of epidemiological assessment are planned to be retrieved over the internet. Numerous studies have involved the proficiency to incorporate GIS or location-built information with genetic conceptions. Consequently, two of the implements are plans to generate image (KML) records for presentation in new GIS sets. In contrast, other internet tools exploited exterior GIS facilities connected to the website, mainly google charts and health charts, to develop policies.

Web-based Recordings

In addition to laboratory experiment and mapping data, web recordings is increasingly used to understand disease outbreaks through social network assessment. Regarding describing the practice of social-network conceptions for community health, healthcare professionals have reflected on the vast set of periodicals that regularly describe visualization of particular occurrences and evaluates (Rumpf et al., 2019). Presentations of social-network assessments in community health generally center on contagion methods in infectious illness contact studies; thus, most research papers have defined the topic. The objective of web-based recordings comprises risk fulfillment of connections, recognizing collective appearances of the infected, visually plotting and interconnecting cases for enhanced understanding of occurrences, and distinguishing possible ways of spread.

Epidemiological Articles Interpretations

Epidemiologists usually utilize various articles to illustrate the existence of a disease. The frequently used concept views illness in terms of vulnerability and contact factors. It assumes that people should be both vulnerable and exposed to an individual’s condition to develop sickness (Tang et al., 2017). For instance, for a person to contract measles, an infectious disease common amongst infants, the patient should have been subjected to a host who is shedding the measles disease and lacks resistance to the illness. Resistance to measles may be resultant from either formerly having had the ailment or being immunized counter to it.

An alternative frequently used system is the epidemiological triad, which perceives illness as the balance of environment, host, and agent factors. The epidemiological triad is a conceptual theory employed by epidemiologists to interpret the causes of illness since it has evolved from the research of contagious diseases and other healthcare concerns (Tang et al., 2017). The model’s central assumption is that infections are instigated by the interaction of three constituent factors, such as environment, agent, and host. The agent is the potential or actual casualty of the sickness. Hosts inhibit features that either protect or incline them to the disease (Tang et al., 2017). The parts are usually biological, such as age, degree of resistance, sex, behavior, lifestyle, traditions, ethos, social; norms, values, and attitudes.

Conversely, the agent aspect refers to the causes of illness, including chemical, nutritional, physical, and biological factors. The environment contains all the exterior dynamics apart from the host and causes that impact healthcare. The surroundings can either be societal, physical, and biological (Tang et al., 2017). Furthermore, to explain the epidemiological triad concept, the situation of lung cancer can be employed. The carrier is the individual who has developed a lung tumor. The patient may have been an active smoker for a significant period. Therefore, the agents are tar, harmful chemical, and the smoke enclosed in the tobacco. The surroundings, in this case, are the work setting where smoking on the job was allowed, and smoking locations were readily available.

Study Designs in Epidemiology

In epidemiology, scientists are fascinated by assessing the connection of contact with disease or consequences. First, they describe the theory centered on the study request and then conclude which research design will be appropriate to respond to the problem. A particular study scheme establishes the methods for conducting the examination. Experimental and observational research designs are substantial in studying contagious infection epidemiology (Giesecke, 2017). Numerous researchers utilize relatively small samples, increasing random errors in infectious illness studies. They are using inappropriate assessment tools and failing to include proactive recruitment increasing systematic errors, aside from compromising standardized diagnostic processes.

Experimental Studies

Randomized control trials (RCT) are regarded as the principal average of a study plan. In RCT, the scholar casually allocates the issues to a regulator faction and investigational group. Indiscrimination prevents confusion and reduces assortment preference, thus enabling researchers to have comparable investigational and control units (Giesecke, 2017). The testing team gets the treatment to be an agent convoluted in the care, avoidance, and causation of a disease. The sample group gets no cure, a palliative cure, or alternative ordinary precaution treatment reliant on the research’s goal. Furthermore, the groups are then monitored regularly to distinguish who improves the consequence of interest. However, the RCT design is costly, and scholars who employ it face challenges with the reliability of randomization owed to rejections, non-compliance, dropouts, and crossovers.

Observational Studies

The observational studies are divided into distinct groups, such as case-control and case-crossover studies. First, case-control research is employed to determine the relationship between various threats and results. The factors that affect the risk of disease are referred to as exposures. Case-control studies can aid in identifying beneficial and harmful vulnerabilities. There are two categories of patient cases and controls in the study, where the cases are persons who have a specific disease, disability, and condition. In contrast, controls are the individuals who do not inhibit the disease symptoms (Giesecke, 2017). Typically, researchers recognize suitable demonstrative controls for the circumstances that they are investigating from the general public. Afterward, they retrospectively examine the historical medical records for the patients’ earlier exposures, which may have exposed them to a specific risk issue.

Choosing the persons for the regulation collection is a vital aspect of a study built on situation-control research. Due to the reflective description of the study design, case-control surveys are matters to recall prejudice (Giesecke, 2017). However, case-control reviews are economical, resourceful, and less time-consuming, thus suitable for analyzing uncommon illnesses that have prolonged dormancy periods. The second type of observational study type is case-crossover, which helps study triggers within a person (Giesecke, 2017). It is also beneficial when the researcher is investigating a quick contact or threat factor. The study design assumes that case and control components originate from the same person. Therefore, every situation is self-matched by helping as its regulator. Therefore, defining the case and resistor mechanisms period is a vital and challenging characteristic of case-border research.

Screening and Assessment of Infectious Disease

Disease Screening and Selection

The process involves two independent medical professionals screening the samples of a specific disease and comparing the current results to the study population. During the screening, all information is analyzed on the target group to determine any genomic and biological sequence of the disease and how it integrates with the human body (Epstein et al., 2018). The determined results were retrieved as whole samples for the second screening by two independent medical research laboratories. Such a move is to ensure conclusive statistics are made before the implementation of preventive measures. The discrepancies between the two resulting data are resolved through consultation and discussion with a third party if a traditional approach is not established between the two initial scientists.

Information Assessment

Information extracted from the studies is recorded, including the biological information of the pathogen’s virus and its impacts on the patients. The researchers usually use various prevailing frameworks to guide data extraction since they present a template to direct information extraction and aid to standardize the collection of statistics across included researchers and scientists (Epstein et al., 2018). The move will help realize the general objective of finding evidence to respond to research questions while also offering a transparent and reproducible methodology. The frameworks are usually employed to collect supplementary data from each isolated individual while including descriptions of the intervention and comparator treatment models. Finally, progress frameworks are used to consider social determinants of healthcare, such as age, sex, culture, socio-economic status, and environment.

Recommendations

A significant encounter for upcoming designers of data conception tools for community health is planning and developing the implements in expansive settings of present information, prevailing procedures and facilities, group partnerships, and inter-corporation and inter-faculty requirements. The current systems are entry-controlled, thus regulating their utilization in contagious illness epidemiology, and might have accomplished their visualization features (Killin, 2020). Therefore, visualization tools of the prospect created by researchers to be harmonious with prevailing information arrangements and principles and interoperable. The tools should further adjust to the swelling compression to be open-access, permitting consumers from low-reserve locations, academic circles, and businesses to maximize visualization and surveillance technology innovations.

Alteration of the illness examination arena to enhance security and healthcare will need scholars to continue strengthening the methodical basis of infectious diseases epidemiology by implementing progress in bioinformatics, data, and other fields. The medical researchers can then incorporate their effort into bio-mechanical production, pain treatment, rehabilitation, and emergency medical services. New technological inventions will profoundly influence future studies and the practice of infectious illness epidemiology (Killin, 2020). The researcher should employ appropriate analysis and actual samples to prevent random faults. Satisfactory valuation of the co-founding variables is vital to evade systematic unfairness in the study of infectious illnesses. Furthermore, sanitization of persons and decontamination of surroundings contagious is necessary for infectious illness control (Killin, 2020). It is essential to seclude patients exposed to contagious diseases distant from vector hygiene and control surveillance.

Conclusion

An illness is regarded as contagious if pathogens have reproduced inside the host and become infectious upon contact with the new bacterium in the host. This research has discovered that transmissible diseases are the principal source of mortality and illness in human existence. Experimental and observational study plans are relevant and established to be significant in the reading of conditions. The prominent models of epidemiologic tools in the study comprise mapping, laboratory testing, and web-based recording. They help detect diseases and evolve associated public healthcare guidelines. The literature reviewed discovered that non-proactive enrollment, unreliable tools, and inadequate samples impact epidemiologic approaches. Additionally, epidemiological methods have played a significant part in disease studies, especially in identifying and describing harms as a community health concern, recognizing and accepting the various unintentional aspects of illness, and evolving and examining involvement initiatives to moderate the threat. Similarly, healthcare professionals have contributed substantially to the development of contemporary epidemiological methodology and concepts.

References

Epstein, D. J., Dunn, J., & Deresinski, S. (2018). Infectious complications of multiple sclerosis therapies: Implications for screening, prophylaxis, and management. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(8), 169-174.

Giesecke, J. (2017). Modern infectious disease epidemiology. CRC Press.

Huremović, D. (2019). A brief history of pandemics (pandemics throughout history). In Psychiatry of pandemics, 7–35. Springer.

Killin, L. (2020). The impact of a health technology improvement program on medication errors in three large, teaching hospitals in London Ontario, 38(12), 30-55.

Rumpf, H.-J., Brandt, D., Demetrovics, Z., Billieux, J., Carragher, N., Brand, M., Bowden-Jones, H., Rahimi-Movaghar, A., Assanangkornchai, S., & Glavak-Tkalic, R. (2019). Epidemiological challenges in the study of behavioral addictions: A call for high standard methodologies. Current Addiction Reports, 6(15), 331–337. Web.

Tang, P., Croxen, M. A., Hasan, M. R., Hsiao, W. W., & Hoang, L. M. (2017). Infection control in the new age of genomic epidemiology. American Journal of Infection Control, 45(2), 170–179.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, August 6). Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study. https://studycorgi.com/epidemiologic-methods-in-infectious-diseases-study/

Work Cited

"Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study." StudyCorgi, 6 Aug. 2022, studycorgi.com/epidemiologic-methods-in-infectious-diseases-study/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study'. 6 August.

1. StudyCorgi. "Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study." August 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/epidemiologic-methods-in-infectious-diseases-study/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study." August 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/epidemiologic-methods-in-infectious-diseases-study/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study." August 6, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/epidemiologic-methods-in-infectious-diseases-study/.

This paper, “Epidemiologic Methods in Infectious Diseases Study”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.