This article critique will focus on the article titled “Event Standardization of Sit-to-Stand Movements”. The article is authored by Bruce Etnyre and David Q Thomas, and they wrote so much on body movements concerning when one is moving from various sitting positions to upright positions. Their study was concerned with natural standing where people were expected to stand up without supporting themselves. They used 50 male and 50 female adults in their study. This was hugely beneficial because their report represents movements in both males and females. It is known that both genders develop differently hence calling for proper research to compare their movements. All participants were expected to perform four different methods of rising from a sitting position. Observations were recorded for further use in analysis and report writing.
These two authors did a tremendously valuable analysis since sit-to-stand movements had been ignored for long (Muscolino, 2011). Their research is useful in the field of medicine as it can be used to compare patients’ functionalities in hospitals. Natural rising up is extremely crucial in human life and patients should be required to perform it whenever they have problems in walking. In addition, they helped in identifying individuals’ movements since they differ from one person to another depending on their body size and structures.
Bruce Etnyre and David Q Thomas went ahead to explain how body movements involve movements of joints. For instance, their body joints form various angles in response to movements made by people when rising naturally. In addition, they argued that these angles differ with the age of individuals. Their study is of immense help to the elderly and people with disabilities. The study favors these groups of people because they are victims of walking problems. Assessments in this report can be darned capable of use to clinical officers attending to the needs of patients who have walking problems.
This article is rich in information because it provides details on the procedure of conducting the assessment. This is extremely powerful because anybody can make use of the report to carry out various movement assessments. In addition, they chose to use mature adults of both genders and different ages in order to get inclusive data. The article is outlining all their results hence being exceptionally agreeable for future scholars. People can use the data provided by the authors of this article to compare with other information within their reach.
After comparing their results with other standardized reports, it was found that their findings supported those of other researchers. This means that their findings were valid as they matched with what others had put in place. They concluded that individual strategies affected movements during rising. This means that the movements of different people differed due to different strategies applied by those people when trying to stand up. STS movements may be used to provide a common communication between researchers and medical practitioners (Burstein, 2009). This means that the report in this article is tremendously crucial for adoption by health workers. In fact, it has proved to concur with most studies conducted by various researchers. In addition, the article highlights issues that affect people every day. Rising from a sitting position is every day’s activity; therefore, clinicians should consider using STS assessments. The article has provided broad information regarding STS assessment hence meeting its said goals. In fact, it has clearly detailed all elements of the STS and should be recommended to medical practitioners. The authors were thorough in putting down their argument hence achieving their goals in writing the article.
References
Muscolino, J. E. (2011). Kinesiology: The Skeletal System and Muscle Function (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Burstein, J. (2009). The Mighty Muscular and Skeletal Systems: How Do My Bones and Muscles Work? London: Crabtree Publishing Company.