Evidence-based practice is a part of the collective triumph of an organization. The incorporation of research evidence requires being encompassed along with the knowledge and clinical proficiency. Research evidence and quality improvement are critical factors for the wellbeing of the hospital (Hall, & Roussel, 2014).
Evidence-Based Practice
Disadvantages of Evidence-Based Practice
The first reason why the ICU does not practice EBP is the lack of evidence. Specialists must think of that when they make decisions regardless of whether the evidence exists or not, they should be more cautious about the consequences. The second reason is applying the outcomes to individuals, which states that the insinuation is that doctors cannot dimly implement a ‘‘verified’’ procedure and accept that a certain person, experiencing that practice, will profit. The third reason is the deficiency of training, time, and resources.
Physicians vs. Evidence-Based Practice
It would be reasonable to involve physicians in the initiative of evidence-based practice, but the hospital should be aware of the limited time the physicians have during their shift. Nevertheless, the advantage of such a decision is evident.
Nurse Manager vs. Nurse
The bottleneck, in this case, is that one cannot practice nursing without proper knowledge. This basically means that before nurses can practice nursing, they should do at least a little research on the subject. The problem may lay in the limited resources the nurses have, but research is still an integral part of nursing.
Focusing on an interprofessional Evidence-Based Practice
Numerous disciplines are consistently involved in resolving compound patient issues, making knowledge distribution across the disciplines substantial to effective care. To close the distance between the data entry and its conversion to knowledge, providers from all disciplines must be able to collaborate effectively.
The involvement of other professions
It is critical that other members of the intensive care unit would also take part in the implementation of the EBP at the workplace. Pharmacists, physical therapists, and even social workers or dieticians similarly need to do research in their field of practice.
Quality Improvement
Meaningful use
Meaningful use looks as if it is all about capturing that the doctor is doing all the required to certify that the patient is being treated as one individual and not just for his or her current complaint. During the two follow-up stages of the meaningful use encouragement program, nurses are manipulating the patient records and doing more paperwork (Trotter, & Uhlman, 2013). Progressively, nurses are complaining that meaningful use is taking too much time away from important patient care and interaction. This turns meaningful use into a serious nursing problem.
The importance of the questions
The questions asked by the team members are important because such nursing issues require immediate reaction. The limitations in knowledge should be continuously pushed up, and the answers given to the team members are designed to eliminate illiteracy among the crew. In the setting of constant lack of time and resources, a timely and straight-to-the-point response is a necessity, not a privilege. Meaningful use is a known issue, and it should be discussed with the team members to clarify things and lessen the risk of losing time and other precious resources.
Meaningful use impact on the task force
Firstly, meaningful use emphasizes the detailed education and training in medical informatics so that healthcare establishments place proper importance rate on education and practice. Secondly, the knowledge and skills essential for a successful task force are very consistent. Collective meaningful use training will cut costs, expand the limits of knowledge, and will guarantee the appreciation of the task force in other fields. Lastly, the healthcare industry as a whole has the responsibility to share insight into the task force’s knowledge, education, and skills.
Conclusion
Evidence-based practice and meaningful use are two important assets in the work of the task force which should be monitored and constantly improved in order to strive for perfection when it comes to the health care quality.
References
Hall, H. R., & Roussel, L. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Trotter, F., & Uhlman, D. (2013). Hacking Healthcare. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.