At the beginning of the 21st century, the healthcare system in the USA has changed dramatically because of new technologies and new treatment methods available for millions of patients. The USA should not have a healthcare reform when citizens are working because it will be a great burden for the state and its financial health. Modern healthcare need effective technology and marketing planning in order to compete with other healthcare providers. Innovations allow healthcare professionals to improve treatment methods and help those patients who are always considered hopeless. Thesis The United States should not have health care reform when members are working, but it has to support every child and provide him/her with quality healthcare services.
The working population of the USA has enough potential to pay for medical purposes and buy medical insurance. Today, healthcare depends upon the goals and objectives of healthcare organizations and their strategic position on the market. The innovative elements used by healthcare organizations are organ transplantation and DNA analysis, cardiac potentiation therapy stimulation and new ways of birth, etc. These innovative technologies, which deal with people’s needs, provide satisfaction for these needs, and, hence, deliver utility.
These drastic changes in income have caused additional turbulence in the market place in terms of people’s needs and their satisfaction. However, the unique concept of healthcare implies that the market functions almost perfectly and to the utmost satisfaction of consumers. “Technology-driven medical care becomes very sophisticated” (Edelman and Mandle 7).
Today’s consumer has a tremendous number of choices. The economic impact of the modern corporate entity is far reaching. New treatment methods and new drugs allow many patients to avoid surgery and support wellness, if the healthcare clients are complaining more often than before about some specific aspects of the healthcare delivery, there appear to be a serious problem in the making (Sheinfeld-Gorin and Arnold 11).
The need to introduce government regulations is justified by the fact that many medical institutions have not introduced dramatic changes to their patterns of purchasing from hospitals. To some extent, decisions are influenced by the pressures exerted by established customs, but this should not conceal the fact that decisions are, none the less, being made to preserve the status quo. Patients, however, may hold that the same hospital in the highest regard. To them, its closure might be considered a disaster.
A ‘pure market’ cannot take into account how and when the adjustments should occur. For this reason, the effects of the market in healthcare should be regulated to preserve continuity and standards and to implement strategy. Additional funding is needed to plan the adjustments which market forces introduce. To maintain consistency and reliability, funds must always be reserved for the purpose of allowing services to be phased in or out over a reasonable period of time. Healthcare markets are driven by consumers, but the use of patients and doctors as ‘consumers’ presents problems. One of the most serious difficulties concerns the quantity of information needed in an effective market place (Sheinfeld-Gorin and Arnold 16).
In contrast to the working population, children need social protection and effective medical services. Some groups of American citizens cannot pay for medical insurance for their children, so the duty and responsibility of the state to support this group of citizens (namely children).
These services can range from short-term health promotion actions such as using one or another of the vast number of over-the-counter treatments, to participation in one of many procedures for the disease prevention or early detection of cancer or cardiovascular disease, to repetitive and longer-term medical preventions such as obtaining an annual check-up, adopting a low-fat diet, avoiding danger by quitting smoking, or adopting any of the wide variety of medical preventions used for months and years to minimize dysfunction and live with an incurable, chronic condition (Edelman and Mandle 65).
In the USA, health care seeking increases for vague and vague symptoms and becomes apparent when the stressor is of several weeks duration; when the stressor onset is recent, care-seeking is minimal as the symptoms are attributed to stress rather than to illness. Emotional health procedures, in the form of rules (e.g., the stress-illness rule and the upset-serious rule) alter the meaning or depiction of somatic events and the procedures generated by them. The main health promotion, though, is the unwarranted assumption that life stress will produce a simple main effect, such that high levels of stress increase decisions to seek health care promotions (Sheinfeld-Gorin and Arnold 76).
In sum, modern healthcare system requires new and innovative approaches to its improvements and development. A new system of payment for patients treated in the hospital may be distinguished by the medical unit in which treatment is given. New price structure and introduction of waiting lists make the emphasis on output, of that the parties agree to a specific requirement for an exact price. Individually agreed contracts may be used most frequently by fund-holding.
Because they inevitably carry larger financial costs, they will be less commonly used, though they will often be the basis on which extra-contractual referrals are priced, in which potential buyers are referred to hospitals with which the medical unit has no existing healthcare contract. In general, healthcare products and services may be reluctant to enter cost per case contracts on a day by day basis, for alarm of losing control over their resources.
Wors Cited
Edelman, C. l. Mandle, C. l. Health Promotion Throughout the Life Span Elsevier/Mosby; 6 edition, 2005.
Sheinfeld-Gorin, S., Arnold, J. Health Promotion in Practice. Jossey-Bass; 1 Edition, 2006.