Chen, B., & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Disability discrimination, medical rationing and COVID-19. Asian Bioethics Review, 12(4), 511-518. Web.
This article talks about social equality and justice for vulnerable populations worldwide. The writers discuss how the public health crisis has exposed the inhumane actions that discriminate against people with disabilities. They further challenge the human rights at stake and the dangers that follow when the quality of life is denied to these communities (Chen & McNamara, 2020). From the article, it is clear that all patients should be treated equally regardless of their race. Discrimination in any manner is an unethical practice by medical experts and prevents people from accessing their human rights. This piece is helpful in my area of focus since it assists the triage assessment team in identifying patients who are likely to die even with medical intervention. The team must not exclude them based on disability, age, race, or any other form that may include their quality of life. This source is reliable since it is current and a peer-reviewed journal. The writers are also law experts who understand the rules and regulations in discrimination.
Supady, A., Brodie, D., & Curtis, J. R. (2021). Ten things to consider when implementing rationing guidelines during a pandemic. Intensive Care Medicine, 47(5), 605-608. Web.
The authors of this article identify ten elements that are critical for consideration when rationing medical services during a crisis. Their goal is to provide additional guidance to enhance and support the implementation of principles and triage guidelines by clinicians to save patients’ lives. They further argue that the rationing decisions are made within the provided jurisdiction hence, must comply with the law (Supady et al., 2021). The write-up is helpful to my area of study since it helps physicians to identify scarce resources. Scarcity might include ventilators, ICU beds or staff, personal protective equipment, or other specific supplies. It provides an opportunity to learn that it is important to practice transparency and engage the public to participate in rationing activities. This source is credible because it is current and has been peer-reviewed. Moreover, the authors are medical experts with much knowledge about the shortages experienced in the field.