Leadership is the ability to inspire, motivate, and empower a group of individuals in an attempt to achieve a specific objective. Today, headship is essential for firms’ long-term and strategic existence because it aligns the employees with the company’s strategy (Mango, 2018). Multiple scholars have formulated several concepts to explain how various forms of governance operate. Some notable examples of such models are contingency, trait, and behavioral theories. This paper explores different types of systems which attempt to describe how various leadership styles work.
The trait principle implies the concept of governance from the perspective of an individual’s innate characteristics. It identifies specific personality features which enable people to perform their leading roles (Mango, 2018). It is an exceptional model for explaining how people’s inherent qualities can lead to their headship roles (Anderson et al., 2017). For example, a prosperous leader certainly has abilities and skills which can be distinguished from other individuals (Mango, 2018).
In contrast, the behavioral model maintains that a person can copy the characteristics of mentors (Mango, 2018). It also implies that leaders are not born but are built through learnable habits. Therefore, it is a good concept that explains headship as seen from examples such as participative and autocratic styles (Anderson et al., 2017).
Additionally, the contingency principle presumes that a person’s leadership’s significance depends on whether their management style matches a specific situation (Mango, 2018). Therefore, it is a valid and exceptional approach because it suggests the type of management style which is useful in specific contexts (Anderson et al., 2017). Finally, its rationality has been seen when it urges individuals not to expect leaders to succeed in all situations.
In conclusion, leadership is a broad concept which is influenced by several factors such as the environment. The theories mentioned have been thorough in elaborating the principle of management. Therefore, while they may have multiple concepts, they explain different sides and aspects of leadership. For example, the trait model elaborates the characteristics of individuals, whereas the behavioral idea justifies the habits which constitute leadership.
References
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 245–260. Web.
Mango, E. (2018). Rethinking leadership theories. Open Journal of Leadership, 07(01), 57. Web.