Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good

The measurements of intelligence are a controversial topic, and it is stated sometimes that intelligence cannot be measured at all. However, in my opinion, intelligence can be measured and even should be. The tools such as intelligence quotient, based on the standardized test, are well known, but it is commonly believed that intelligence is beyond any measurement, and thus, all such tools are wrong (Colbert et al., 2017). I think that the actual case is that intelligence is hard to measure, as it is a very complex structure, but it is not impossible. There are many types of intelligence: rational intelligence, which is measured by intelligence quotient tests; emotional intelligence, which is connected with perceiving and understanding emotions; and other measures. Intelligence quotient (IQ) was developed first to evaluate one’s intelligence and was significantly improved from that time. The IQ test is based on the ability to search for connections, similarities, and oppositions. However, other intelligence indices were also developed and used to determine the human’s abilities to think.

I think that intelligence should be measured because it enables one to understand the sense of intelligence better and use it much more efficiently. It is fitting that many tests are used for measurements of intelligence: it is complex and multi-functional, like the human brain itself, and different measures are necessary to evaluate its different functions. For example, Relational Abilities Index (RAI) measures abilities to develop and maintain relationships, which is examined in the research of Colbert et al. (2017). Relational Frame Theory, discussed in the article, represents the human’s ability to create different frames of objects (for example, cats or people), attitudes (beliefs, opinions), and relations (what is connected and in which way). Such scales contribute to the development of human cognitive abilities and enable measuring them directly and showing the results of such measurements. In that way, they are useful, and intelligence should be measured wherever possible.

Reference

Colbert, D., Dobutowitsch, M., Roche, B., & Brophy, C. (2017). The proxy-measurement of intelligence quotients using a relational skills abilities index. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 114–122. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, October 25). Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good. https://studycorgi.com/measurements-of-intelligence-and-why-they-are-good/

Work Cited

"Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good." StudyCorgi, 25 Oct. 2022, studycorgi.com/measurements-of-intelligence-and-why-they-are-good/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good'. 25 October.

1. StudyCorgi. "Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good." October 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/measurements-of-intelligence-and-why-they-are-good/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good." October 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/measurements-of-intelligence-and-why-they-are-good/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good." October 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/measurements-of-intelligence-and-why-they-are-good/.

This paper, “Measurements of Intelligence and Why They Are Good”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.