Davis, C. G., & Lin, B. H. (2005). Factors affecting US beef consumption. US Department of Agriculture.
tailored to your instructions
for only $13.00 $11.05/page
This source provides a significant extent of statistical evidence regarding beef consumption in the United States. Despite the fact that this particular publication can be considered outdated, it may serve as an essential background for understanding the issue’s retrospective. Furthermore, this website contains many other reliable and relevant information that can be used in terms of the research; it seems rational to note here that all the governmental materials available to the public can be utilized in academic investigations. There is no doubt that the US Department of Agriculture is able to give important insights into the framework of ethical factors that affect meat consumption.
Food Ethics Council. (2021). Meat, livestock, & diary.
Food Ethics Council is a non-governmental organization that operates worldwide in order to improve global nutrition habits and trends. Starting from the production of meat and dairy products and ending with their consumption – the official website of this organization covers a great variety of topics. The latter ones are likely to be relevant for the purposes of the study and shed light on meat consumption problems from the perspective of an operating entity. This will allow an in-depth understanding of the prerequisites of ethical factors that determine people’s choices in eating meat.
Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2020). Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to substitute. Food Quality and Preference, 80(1), 1–31.
The article provides pieces of evidence that are directly related to the research question of the study. The authors investigate the moral norms and considerations within the scope of meat consumption under the current conditions. Hence, there is a great opportunity to obtain the crucial theoretical basis for the project by getting acquainted with this publication thoroughly. It demonstrates a coherent train of thought, covers the theme appropriately, has a plethora of reliable references, and gives significant findings.
Pickles, M. (2017). The ethical arguments against eating meat. Oxford News Blog.
as little as 3 hours
By appealing to a recent online publication available at a reliable magazine, it is possible to figure out trends relevant to a particular topic. For example, Oxford News Blog gives pieces of news regarding a variety of themes, and given the fact that it is the university’s platform, this source can be considered credible. A post that was published by Pickles provides the critical ideas that show the inappropriacy of meat consumption. The provided postulates serve as a guideline for many people; thus, these ideas can be used and discussed in the research.
Purslow, P. P. (2017). New aspects of meat quality: From genes to ethics. Elsevier.
The book that is edited by Purslow contains a number of chapters written by different authors. It should be stressed that not all the sections are relevant to the purposes of the study, given that the focus is on ethical factors affecting meat consumption. The chosen and utilized chapters are dedicated to the themes of ethics and societal view of the issue, which contributed to consistency and accuracy within the scope of the research. Some supplemental sections were read as well because they allow realizing the diversity and complexity of the topic.
Rollin B.E. (2014). Beef production: Ethical issues. In: Thompson P. B. & Kaplan D. M. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics (pp. 187–195). Springer.
The chapter gives some notable findings in terms of how beef production can be viewed from an ethical perspective. It is important to study the issue from different angles and to understand how the process of beef provision can be perceived as a good option to find out the prerequisites of people’s points of view in this vein. The chapter is written in a consistent and precise manner, which leads to a smooth transition from one idea to another, as well as the clear deleverage of the findings that are used in the study.
Stea, S., & Pickering, G. J. (2017). Optimizing messaging to reduce red meat consumption. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 633–648.
The authors dedicate their research to the issue of conveying the message of the inappropriacy of red meat consumption. Their rationale is guided by a number of ethical considerations, which are important to use in terms of the project. This peer-reviewed article provides the opportunity to see the topic from a number of perspectives so that its understanding could be enriched – starting from the ethical and ending with the biological one.