Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management

First of all, it is essential to explain what is meant by a management type. By management type or organizational structure is understood as a system that defines a hierarchy in an organization. It demonstrates each position, its function, and to whom it reports (Friend, 2019). Establishing a clear organizational structure is vital. It allows the company to react and adapt to uncertainties and changes adequately, manage decision-making processes, and meet its aims. A suitable organizational structure depends on a company’s type and goals.

The idea of the two organizational structures (mechanistic and organic) belongs to Tom Burns and G. M. Stalker. Their theory explained which organization form is suitable for specific conditions of change and stability (Godwyn & Gittell, 2012). Mechanistic form implies organizations with centralized decision-making, formal rules, specialized tasks, reporting relationships, strictly defined duties, and a hierarchical structure that organizes a company’s operation routine. It can be imagined as a pyramid, the top of which is the CEO, and all processes occur from the top down. General Motors is a vivid example of an organization that employs the mechanistic form. The organizational structure fits companies of such immense size ideally and eases their decision-making process. Moreover, as the car market exists in a relatively stable environment, the company can be highly hierarchical, as rapid strategic moves are not required to be profitable.

Concerning the organic form, these kinds of organizations do not imply a strict structure, job definitions and functions are flexible, decision-making is decentralized; tasks are less specific and more general. Moreover, information is freely exchanged among different levels of employees. Google is one of the most illustrative examples of an organic organizational structure. This kind of structure allows Google to adapt quickly and successfully to a fast-changing business environment. Moreover, a loose atmosphere inside the company increases the efficiency of employees.

References

Friend, L. (2019). What is the meaning of organizational structure? Chron. Web.

Godwyn, M., & Gittell, J. H. (Eds.). (2012). Sociology of organizations: Structures and Relationships. Sage.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, June 14). Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management. https://studycorgi.com/mechanistic-vs-organic-form-of-management/

Work Cited

"Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management." StudyCorgi, 14 June 2022, studycorgi.com/mechanistic-vs-organic-form-of-management/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management'. 14 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management." June 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mechanistic-vs-organic-form-of-management/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management." June 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mechanistic-vs-organic-form-of-management/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management." June 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/mechanistic-vs-organic-form-of-management/.

This paper, “Mechanistic vs. Organic Form of Management”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.