Peer-Review Process, Reviewer’s and Editor’s Role

Peer review process

Two points of the peer review process seem especially important to me. First, it is important that the peer reviewers are working separately and do not share their findings before arriving at a definitive conclusion. I think it is important because it eliminates the cognitive bias of groupthink and allows increasing the objectivity by aggregating several independently made conclusions. Second, I think it is important that the peer reviewers do not receive the information about the author of the manuscript. If this would be the case, the reputation of the author will likely get in the way of objective judgment. The fundamental principle of the scientific method is the priority of evidence over reputation, and blinding of the process warrants the adherence to this principle.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Differences between Editors and Peer Reviewers

There are two main differences between the editor and the peer reviewers. First, the editor considers the overall value of the article whereas the peer reviewers verify the specificities of the methodology. From this standpoint, the latter performs a more technical role. Second, one of the editor’s responsibilities is communication with the author of the article intended to reach the desired goal whereas peer reviewers assess the content and point to the discrepancies. Thus, the editor has an observable share of influence on the final product.

Information on Peer Review

The article by Riggs, Lozano, Mohelnitzky, Rudnick, and Richards (2014) was peer-reviewed. The easiest way to verify this is to refer to the profile of the publication source, The Permanente Journal, which clearly states that the articles undergo the peer review (The Permanente Journal, n.d.). Since peer review is a procedure recommended by the academic standards, the journals that incorporate it usually specify it in their profiles. Therefore, the peer-reviewed information should be sought primarily in the overview of the source as its inclusion adds to the source’s credibility.


The Permanente Journal. (n.d.). About the journal. Web.

Riggs, K. R., Lozano, P., Mohelnitzky, A., Rudnick, S., & Richards, J. (2014). An adaptation of family-based behavioral pediatric obesity treatment for a primary care setting: Group health family wellness program pilot. The Permanente Journal, 18(3), 4-10.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style


StudyCorgi. (2021, January 10). Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role. Retrieved from

Work Cited

"Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role." StudyCorgi, 10 Jan. 2021,

1. StudyCorgi. "Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role." January 10, 2021.


StudyCorgi. "Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role." January 10, 2021.


StudyCorgi. 2021. "Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role." January 10, 2021.


StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Peer-Review Process, Reviewer's and Editor's Role'. 10 January.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!