Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review

Credibility is one of the central aspects of any research project. For this reason, there is a specific peer review cycle needed to determine the nature of a study. Among all points of this process, I differentiate the evaluation of methods used for the research and recommendation for publishing as the most significant ones (“Scrutinizing science: Peer review,” n.d.). Correct methodology is critical for the validity of findings. At the same time, being published, a paper becomes a credible source used by other scientists, which increases its value. That is why I consider these points to be critical.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

One should also realize the fact that the quality of scholarly journals content is guaranteed by the hard work of editors who are responsible for their publishing. There are also peer reviewers who assist editors in determining the relevance of information presented in papers and their credibility. However, there are at least two points that differ an editor from a peer reviewer. First, the last one is not responsible for the whole journal as he/she might check only several articles, but editors work with all of them. Second, a final decision whether to publish a paper or not is made by an editor.

It is also critical to differentiate between the high quality and irrelevant sources. Several aspects indicate a peer-reviewed paper. First of all, it should have a volume and issue numbers. It means that an article is published in a scholarly journal which is checked by an editor and peer reviewer. It is also critical to consider the title of a journal as it will indicate the relevance of its content and the nature of the information presented in it. I am sure that the article chosen for this week meets these requirements and can be considered a peer-reviewed one. Additionally, new peer-reviewed papers can be found in scholarly journals or online databases containing them.

References

Scrutinizing science: Peer review. (n.d.). Web.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2021, May 5). Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/information-literacy-credibility-and-peer-review/

Work Cited

"Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review." StudyCorgi, 5 May 2021, studycorgi.com/information-literacy-credibility-and-peer-review/.

1. StudyCorgi. "Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review." May 5, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/information-literacy-credibility-and-peer-review/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review." May 5, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/information-literacy-credibility-and-peer-review/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2021. "Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review." May 5, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/information-literacy-credibility-and-peer-review/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Information Literacy: Credibility and Peer Review'. 5 May.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Susan
Online
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
Yes
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
Yes
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!
Yes