Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle

Peer reviewing is an essential part of the scientific publishing process. It is necessary in order to ensure the accuracy and quality of information presented in the peer-reviewed article. The peer-review cycle is comprised of four points, which are as follows (Fernandez, 2012):

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More
  • Writing and submitting an article for review
  • Editorial analysis and consistency checking
  • Peer-reviewing process
  • Publishing of the article

Each of these points is important for different reasons, as without them the cycle itself would be broken. In other words, without each of the steps, it would be impossible to complete the process. It is impossible to review an article that is not written and formatted according to the requirements of the journal. At the same time, the peer-reviewing process is made pointless if there are no means of publishing an article. Editors are different from peer-reviewers in a few ways. First, while peer-reviewers are typically specialists in the field, editors are often not. Their job is to conduct an initial screening of the article, ensuring that it conforms to the subject and format of the journal, and making a decision to publish or refuse an article. The reviewers, on the other hand, only provide recommendations and criticism in order to improve the article, and spot any inconsistencies that are present in the paper.

In order to determine if an article is peer-reviewed or not, one must look at its source. Typically, peer-reviewed articles can be found in books and scientific journals dedicated to a particular subject. Newspapers, websites, and other sources typically do not contain peer-reviewed information. One of the best ways to look for peer-reviewed data is to browse through dedicated databases, such as MEDLINE, CINAHL, and others.


Fernandez, C. (2012). A day in a life of a scientific reviewer. Web.

Print Сite this

Cite this paper

Select style


StudyCorgi. (2021, May 5). Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle. Retrieved from

Work Cited

"Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle." StudyCorgi, 5 May 2021,

1. StudyCorgi. "Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle." May 5, 2021.


StudyCorgi. "Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle." May 5, 2021.


StudyCorgi. 2021. "Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle." May 5, 2021.


StudyCorgi. (2021) 'Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle'. 5 May.

Copy to clipboard

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.

Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!