Mr. J. was admitted with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, severe with melancholic features, and MMPI-3 computer test results. Indicators L, K, F are generally expected; however, F has relatively high values, which may be associated with reduced performance due to overwork, a painful condition, or a desire to slander oneself. The description of the situation corresponds to the high value of F due to the emotional instability of the personality of Mr. J. This fact is confirmed by the high score on the EID scale, indicating problems with mood and affect. The restructured scales show a lack of positive emotional response and a general state of dissatisfaction. At the same time, the patient does not yet have problems with physical health and strong emotions, such as impulsivity or anxiety, in combination with antisocial behavior. In this regard, the scales of specific problems are relatively low, and if he runs the problem further, they may appear. Among the internalization of weights, self-doubt and suicidal thoughts caused by a sense of one’s worthlessness within the current situation become vital indicators. Problems in the family led to the emergence of interpersonal problems, up to hostility towards other people. The PSY-5 scales reflect the introversion and negative emotionality of the patient, which generally confirms the diagnosis. Suicidal tendencies due to significant self-doubt, low self-esteem, demoralization, and lack of hope are indeed reflected in the results of the MMPI-3 test.
The BDI-II test, which can assess and monitor the patient’s condition in the context of depression, may also be suitable for this situation. In this case, Mr. J. has already attempted suicide, which requires exceptional control over him, including his emotional state. The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, suitable for recent research in cases where the patient’s case is associated with suicidal tendencies due to situational dependence, can also assess more detailed and in-depth intervention (Kuang et al., 2020). In addition to two additional personality assessments, the patient requires constant care and interaction.
Ms. S is depressed after a stressful experience where she witnessed a suicide. Although the symptoms of depression are generally on the decline, the patient noticed a decrease in attention, confirmed by the MMPI-3 test. The reliability scale of her test showed that the results are dramatized, which does not negate the need for intervention. Due to a pessimistic attitude, problems with socialization and attention appear. The psychologist’s conclusion was of an applied nature with specific advice on arranging the environment, developing good habits that contributed to improving attention. However, the BAI scale showed a severe degree of subjective anxiety, which signals the need for additional treatment. First, the patient needs to continue drug treatment for depression under the supervision of the attending physician.
Given that the problems have intensified recently, it is also necessary to pass the 16PF scale, which controls emotional stability and anxiety. Secondly, it will be necessary to work with a projective measures test that can identify the authentic sources of anxiety and anxiety in Ms. S. This approach is essential and effective precisely in cases where it is necessary to identify patients’ life-threatening problems, up to suicidal thoughts (Rani & Singh, 2021). Despite improvements in various aspects and symptoms, the patient needs to complete the treatment due to the over-dramatization of problems, which was noted in the previous conclusion.
References
Kuang, L., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Chen, X., Lv, Z., Cao, J.,… & Chen, J. (2020). Relationship between Internet addiction, susceptible personality traits, and suicidal and self-harm ideation in Chinese adolescent students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(3), 676-685.
Rani, M., & Singh, U. (2021). Projective and Psychometric Indices of Suicide Ideation. SIS Journal of Projective Psychology and Mental Health, 28(1), 38-46. Web.