Reducing Surgical Site Infections

The purpose of the research study was to analyze how professional health institutions have suggested reducing surgical site infections. The interventions told included both actions to be taken before the operation was conducted and after it had been conducted. The suggestions included pharmacological and non-pharmacological ways to help care workers curb the surgical site infections issue. The purpose of the research study was easy to identify because the authors clearly stated it in the introduction. Further, appropriate words such as “surgical site infections” and “SSI-prevalence compliance” helped identify the research purpose.

The rationale for the study is stated clearly in the research paper. There are many complications and concerns associated with surgery. Abdominal surgery is mainly associated with high susceptibility to acquiring infections in the operating room (Tomsic et al., 2020). These infections force the patient to stay in the hospital longer than expected. Inpatient care is usually quite expensive, and most families cannot afford it. Surgical site infections could also necessitate additional surgery to handle the problem. These factors increase the cost of treatment for the family of the patient. Making sure the interventions to prevent surgical site infections is therefore essential.

The research study was observational, as indicated by the purpose statement. It is easy to conclude that the analysis done was observational due to the specific words used by the writers such as that it would be a systematic review of articles that already existed. The writers mention that the thought would be based on suggestions given by professional institutions in peer-reviewed articles. The reports cited for the study were not published within the past five years.

The problem statement in the article is grounded on the literature given in the research study. The writers have used the “Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections” written by the World Health Organization (Tomsic et al., 2020). It included examples and descriptions, which were given in terms of numbers. The authors have an example prevalence of SSIs in Germany. The delinquent is justified by explaining its history, its impacts on the healthcare system, and its interventions. They then scrutinized these interventions to understand why they were not functioning properly and what could be done.

The problem that led to the research study was a high incidence of surgical site infections, primarily associated with abdominal surgery, which increases the cost of treatment and poses the risk of nosocomial disease, leading to death. The issue is easy to identify from the article because the wording used is quite precise. The authors even employ numbers to explain the extent of the problem. The rationale of the trial is clearly stated.

The essayists performed an observational study, and this is demonstrated in the problem statement through the use of certain words; for example, the report says that “In 2016, 22.4% of all the infections in healthcare were surgical site infections” (Tomsic et al., 2020, p. 2). Further, it states that among these surgical site infections, the ones from colon surgery were more prevalent, especially surgeries involving the colon. Observational studies involve the researchers collecting data from various sources and analyzing it to find a solution. These studies have an important role in health care because they can evaluate the effectiveness of medical interventions such as surgery (Aghazadeh-Attari et al., 2018). There are no invasive techniques applied. The articles cited were not published within the past five years.

References

Aghazadeh-Attari, J., Mobaraki, K., Ahmadzadeh, J., Mansorian, B., & Mohebbi, I. (2018). Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes, 11, 266 (2018). Web.

Tomsic, I., Heinze, N. R., Chaberny, I. F., Krauth, C., Schock, B., & von Lengerke, T. (2020). Implementation interventions in preventing surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, April 17). Reducing Surgical Site Infections. https://studycorgi.com/reducing-surgical-site-infections/

Work Cited

"Reducing Surgical Site Infections." StudyCorgi, 17 Apr. 2023, studycorgi.com/reducing-surgical-site-infections/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Reducing Surgical Site Infections'. 17 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "Reducing Surgical Site Infections." April 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/reducing-surgical-site-infections/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Reducing Surgical Site Infections." April 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/reducing-surgical-site-infections/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Reducing Surgical Site Infections." April 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/reducing-surgical-site-infections/.

This paper, “Reducing Surgical Site Infections”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.