Introduction
The interactions between two or more individuals develop over time depending on the shared emotions, goals, ideologies, and purpose of existence. Relationships have different types of bonds that result in acceptance or rejection. According to Brown and Fredrickson (2021), the longevity of social relationships depends on the nature of the frequent interactions affecting the personal meaning of life and emotions of individuals in a given social setting. Social relationships can exist in neighborhoods, workplaces, extended families, schools, and sports arenas, among other places. Therefore, determining the significance of social networking leans on an individual’s ability to diversify with people from different geographical settings and aggressiveness to change one’s social status. The differences in how people handle each other in relationships create variety in how people connect. Several factors influence the stability of relationships irrespective of individualistic interests. The urge of developing socially responsible individuals with stable mindsets and sense of safety exposes people to considering quantity, quality and diversity aspects of life in reviewing the needs of social relationships.
Quality Benefits of Social Relationships
Sense of Responsibility
Social relationships instill a sense of responsibility among people in the community. Identifying with particular social classes impacts the ability of an individual to be productive. For instance, setting limits in social contexts helps relationships develop immunity to poverty and associated challenges. People with a common goal of community development differ from those who unite for personal interests and satisfaction. Social gatherings triggered by peer influence result in negative energies like abuse and consumption of drugs and substances. On the contrary, Piolatto et al. (2022) argue that populations inspired by societal changes end with a developmental discussion like project installments. Van prooijen et al. (2022) challenges teenagers today to develop a strong relationship at school to improve their chances of success in the future. Setting limits for achieving more essential goals like stable and selling careers is one such inspiration that indicates the pros of building effective social relationships. Alumni can jointly collect money among themselves and construct libraries and classrooms for their former schools to increase the sense of responsibility in the community. Such growth motivates learners to become more responsible and cautious about the future and the community.
Strong Mental Health
Social relationships help people develop good mental health, especially at work and school. Social gatherings with a sense of responsibility lighten individuals’ moods in such relationships. According to Wu et al. (2021), interacting with people of similar social desires makes individuals happier and stronger mentally because peers get to share ideologies that increase one’s self-esteem. Social bonds characterized by jovial and refreshed populations improve individuals’ ability to think and act right (Piolatto et al., 2022). As a result, students with a similar mindset enjoy a healthy mental status because they associate with people who boost their emotional intelligence. Social relationships allow people in such unions to confide in each other; the trust among like-minded individuals creates some sense of satisfaction. However, abusive relationships or wrongful choices of friendships in social environments expose people to dementia, depression, anxiety, and stress. Healthy social relationships at work increase teamwork and organizational growth. Research conducted by Van prooijen et al. (2022) illustrated that 40% of organizations confine employees in social relationships only of such unions result in teamwork and workplace motivation. Therefore, strong ties impact individuals’ psychological health and the overall functionality of workers.
Improves Safety and Sense of Belonging
The sense of security and individual safety in neighborhoods develops when people share a common goal in life. Residences in wealthy estates experience lesser cases of criminality than those living in asylums. Brown and Fredrickson (2021) hold that the differences in the two groups’ ambitions result in continuous complaints of immorality in slum-based habitats and unending peace in first-class residences. People living in elegant homes share a common sense of belonging because such individuals think much about business growth and community-based projects. The social relationships among wealthy individuals are oriented on evolution and change, while those of unlikened minds think much about crime (Brown & Fredrickson, 2021). The inability of poor communities to depend on themselves for survival leads youth to crime, while the economic stabilities among people from the wealthy class expose such persons to the positions of initiating change in society. Social relationships increase the chances of humanity to handle security issues because of the diversity of careers in such places. Inter-professional consultations among communities supporting social relationships end with identifying solutions to the reigning insecurity matters.
Awareness of Pertinent Public Issues
Social solid relationships expose participants to hearing and respecting other people’s opinions about numerous phenomena. People united with a common goal of growth and change discuss societal issues to provide solutions. For instance, if a neighborhood continuously witnesses environmental pollution issues of improper solid waste management, concerned individuals will sit together to sort out the menace before it escalates to a worse position. However, Piolatto et al. (2022) challenge environmentalists to refute the World Health Organization’s recent research on the increasing solid waste in slums. In the findings, Van prooijen et al. (2022) agree that the dropping of solid wastes in neighborhoods increases with illiteracy and lack of knowledge on the disadvantages of environmental pollution. In addition, Wu et al. (2021) connect social relationships to the topic by stating that awareness creation reduces the rate of solid waste problems in places surrounded by sound-minded volunteers who rain society the importance of environmental conservation and sustainability. Social relationships built on the policies of principles of knowledge create awareness of imperative topics affecting the public’s well-being.
Material Reward
People need social relationships to strengthen their financial mindsets and material benefits in workplaces. Unemployed individuals or struggling families depend on their social connections to survive. A responsible community prioritizes social relationships because such unions help vulnerable populations to get basic needs and wants from able individuals. The needs of low-income families cannot be answered in a single day by an individual. However, socially responsible groups and agencies can facilitate change and limit poverty by empowering and sponsoring children via education (Redhead & Power, 2022). Educating children from poor backgrounds increases the chances f eradicating poverty in such families and communities. Therefore, the impacts of social relationships can be felt if participants collectively build a strong background in educating children. The material incentives attained from employment will later help the upcoming generations not to experience famine and poor states of families. Thus, the material benefits attached to social relationships attract individuals to join such unions.
Quantitative Aspects of Social Relationships
Impacts of Social Acceptance and Rejection
The need to belong to particular social group results in rejection or acceptance. According to DeWall and Bushman (2011), all the mysteries associated with the underlining needs of wanting to belong to a particular group or social class start with the science of social acceptance and rejection. Nine over ten individuals agree that belonging to a specific social relationship depends on the need to associate to positive social contact and the urge to develop stable frameworks of an ongoing relationship (DeWall & Bushman, 2011). Therefore, the choice of being rejected in social contexts interferes with the mentality of more than half of people who are denied the chance of social identity. As a result, the sweetness of social relationships depends on their ability to accept people of similar opinions and ideologies about life. In addition, the partial satisfaction of wanting to be identified with a particular social group regularly drives 34% of adult women into depression (DeWall & Bushman, 2011). The rejection of such individuals familiarizes psychological scientists with the adverse effects of social relationships.
The well-being of people in given social settings can be predicted or determined using the aspects of social relationships. Collins et al. (2022) echo that the rational diversity of individuals’ portfolios equals the richness and evenness of social relationships. The total interactions of 578 in the American Times Use Survey demonstrated that a person’s well-being depends on the correspondents’ social interaction abilities (Collins et al., 2022). In other words, the wellness of a community is directly proportional to the social relationships created in such boundaries.
The answers on responding to social rejection begin with the classification of social acceptance and rejection as either “sweet” or “bitter.” Nearly 70% of early humans survived harsh environments by depending on others to attain their daily needs and wants (DeWall & Bushman, 2011). The same case applies today, where successful individuals motivate low-class people to work harder and smarter to achieve financial stability. The availability of better persons in the community inspires vulnerable populations who anticipate living such lives. Poverty is a measure of success because it allows individuals in social settings to be accepted or rejected in particular functions and events (Brown & Fredrickson, 2021). The 50 million people in the U.S. depend on cognitive and behavioral therapies to accept their disabled mindsets is an accurate picture of the impacts of social relationships. People depend on failed relationships to correct their current situations and perception of social environments. However, DeWall and Bushman (2011) believe that preventing the emotional marker of social rejection starts with the fight against sadness, anger, and jealousy because two-thirds of emotional failures affect the stability of social relationships.
Certain factors are associated with the increased failure of social rejections today. Wu et al. (2021) suggested that over half of people experiencing social rejection developed a negative attitude toward social relationships based on the diminished responses created by their peers. The low self-esteem ejected after social rejection makes affected groups aggressive towards everyone around (DeWall & Bushman, 2011). The intense desire for affiliation among socially rejected individuals threatens the future of millions of innocent citizens who have not tasted the adverse effects of social relationships (Redhead & Power, 2022). Hormonal imbalances associated with aggressiveness expose socially rejected people to isolation and withdrawal. Thus, the negative impacts of social relationships showcase the impediments of such unions. The globe should focus on activities that build the emotions of the majority to increase social acceptance rates. Coping with social rejections starts with exploring individual emotional intelligence and the ability to network with people from numerous diversities.
Diversity Issues Liked to Social Relationships
The diversity of social relationships enables people to understand the cultures, values, and norms of non-natives for cohabiting. According to Epley (2008), social relationships contribute to the growth of people’s perceptions and abilities to distinguish third parties’ feelings, emotions, and thoughts. Furthermore, the research conducted at the University of Chicago suggests that the difficulties associated with reading other people’s minds develop due to individuals’ inability to form efficient and workable social relationships (Epley, 2008). Interactions within social settings increase individuals’ awareness of other people’s psychological status. Judging people based on their mental status exposes societies to handling individuals with depression, anxiety, and fear differently than healthy persons. For instance, crimes committed by mentally unstable individuals are more easily forgivable than those committed by psychologically fit individuals. The modern judicial service commission also stresses the significance of mental tests before subjecting suspects to pre-trial motions and questioning. As a result, social relationships impact how communities settle misunderstandings without discrimination and favoritism.
The contemporary world needs social relationships to solve real problems arising in the community. The egocentric approaches to solving issues in the community have driven communities into unending problems. However, Epley (2008) illustrates that adopting such ties in society improves the ability of individuals to unite with a shared sense of achievement. Epley (2008) reasons that the different minds brought together make life more accessible based on the diversity of such information. Making information available from different perspectives increases the chances of social interactions among peers. The like-minded individuals in such settings debate their differences with the mission of making life simpler and better. Therefore, social responsibility increases awareness about social phenomena and boosts the unity of individuals in solving public problems.
Conclusion
The consideration of quantity, quality, and diversity in the analysis of the pros and cons of social relationships helps individuals to accept change in their environments. The study’s findings illustrate that social responsibility helps to create a sense of responsibility, robust mental health, an improved understanding of safety and security, increased awareness of pubic matters, and material reward within the community. Although social responsibility negatively affects people, the type of association helps communities solve public problems through diverse approaches. Social responsibility allows people to accept and respect the thoughts, feelings, and emotions of others.
References
Brown, C. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). Characteristics and consequences of co-experienced positive affect: Understanding the origins of social skills, social bonds, and caring, healthy communities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39(9), 58–63. Web.
Collins, H. K., Hagerty, S. F., Quoidbach, J., Norton, M. I., & Brooks, A. W. (2022). Relational diversity in social portfolios predicts well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(43), 1–9. Web.
DeWall, C. N., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). Social acceptance and rejection: The sweet and the bitter. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 256–260. Web.
Epley, N. (2008). Solving the (real) other minds problem. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1455–1474.
Piolatto, M., Bianchi, F., Rota, M., Marengoni, A., Akbaritabar, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2022). The effect of social relationships on cognitive decline in older adults: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. BMC Public Health, 22(1). Web.
Redhead, D., & Power, E. A. (2022). Social hierarchies and social networks in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 34(7), 377–498. Web.
Van prooijen, J.-W., Spadaro, G., & Wang, H. (2022). Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43(12), 65–69. Web.
Wu, J., Gou, F., Xiong, W., & Zhou, X. (2021). A reputation value-based task-sharing strategy in opportunistic complex social networks. Complexity, 20(7), 1–16. Web.