The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos

Introduction

Copyrighting videos means claiming the ownership and protection of the idea and that when one shares it, no one can claim it as their own. In technical terms, the video is protected under intellectual property law. It gives exclusive rights to the video content, and other entities are restricted from replicating, vending, or reconstructing it. In 1974 the United States became a member of the convention that safeguarded the procedures of phonograms contrary to unauthorized duplication of their contents (Joyce et al., 2016). Thus, the inventor of the footage is given the copyrights about it. For instance, the manager and the subcontractor should know that if A uploads a video that belonged to B, then the copyright belongs to B, and permission must be granted to A for uploading the material. The moment the video is produced and put into tangible usage so is the copyright. The inventor lives with the copyrights for even a period after the death of the creator. The copyright can also be registered with the United States office of Copyrights.

Some clips may be used for debating or criticizing by adding unusual subtitles, resulting in favorable or unfavorable commentaries. They can criticize or comment both indirectly and explicitly, for instance, through parody. They can call for criticism from those who include commentary or complement to it. The video producers may utilize as much of the initial work as is necessary to scrutinize it. Rebuttal and observations are the foundations of the fair use canon as a safeguard for communication liberty (Park, 2016). Comments can be lively, which can be achieved, for example, by adding description—which can be done by restructuring the original. Where there is an unfavorable claim, the implication is that the criticism may cause competitive damage in the business for the quoted work.

The patented videos can be used for demonstration or reference purposes only. Content creators use protected material to highlight or emphasize a point but not to make remarks. For example, Movie production excerpts could be utilized to demonstrate how American attitudes toward race are shifting. It is described as acceptable use and is commonly recognized in other artistic cultures. The development of new significance occurs equally when recording producers do not offer the content quoted in its initial form but remake it as a different one. The other situation is where protected content is captured unintentionally or mistakenly (Park, 2016). Whenever the video producers capture scenes in specific surroundings, they capture patented sounds and pictures. For example, footage filmed at a wedding whilst copyrighted song plays, or a clip recorded when a child is being taught to walk while some song plays in the background. The video creators should attempt to invalidate, stop, or change reality.

Copyright breaches include: putting a video on one’s company’s website that contains copyrighted songs or words. Going to record a movie in a theater, using copyrighted photographs on a firm’s site, or even uploading films or songs without accounting for their use are all examples of infringement (Park, 2016). The subcontractor should register copyright the footage he or she plans to use to prevent it from being copied and shared by some other entity. They can also seek legal counsel from a patent lawyer to help them address questions about copyright protection and decide their legal avenues. After applying for these rights, they can now use a registration certificate to secure their production or content. The company will now publicly prove that the work identified with it has been licensed by using a trademark symbol in comparison to the other components.

References

Joyce, C., Ochoa, T. T., Carroll, M. W., Leaffer, M. A., & Jaszi, P. (2016). Copyright law. Carolina Academic Press.

Park, H. (2016). Design and Implementation of Server-based Resource Obfuscation Techniques for Preventing Copyrights Infringement to Android Contents. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(5), 13-20. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, August 24). The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos. https://studycorgi.com/the-1974-copyright-regulations-on-internet-videos/

Work Cited

"The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos." StudyCorgi, 24 Aug. 2022, studycorgi.com/the-1974-copyright-regulations-on-internet-videos/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos'. 24 August.

1. StudyCorgi. "The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos." August 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-1974-copyright-regulations-on-internet-videos/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos." August 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-1974-copyright-regulations-on-internet-videos/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos." August 24, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-1974-copyright-regulations-on-internet-videos/.

This paper, “The 1974 Copyright Regulations on Internet Videos”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.