Mofijur, M. et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: Lessons learnt from a global pandemic. 2021.
The article is an extensive review focusing on three intriguing topics: ecology, society, and economics. First, the authors discuss coronavirus’s environmental consequences and impacts, including the health harms of increased waste and CO2. The third paragraph of the article focuses on the socio-economic implications of COVID-19. The authors point out that people who worked in social interactions were most affected: tourism, entertainment, and transportation suffered the most (Mofijur et al.). Employees of such enterprises lost their jobs, did not receive decent wages, and often experienced a crisis in communication and finances.
The source is valid for the forthcoming study because it draws attention to how the impact of the coronavirus on society is invariably related to other areas. It looks at culture to the effects on the economy and the environment, making it necessary to study. Article was published online in October 2020 and went to press in April 2021. It is part of the peer-reviewed journal Sustainable production and consumption, with a high credibility index. In addition, the authors of the article are professors or lecturers in senior positions at the University of Sydney, which allows them to be seen as credible scholars.
Osterrieder, A. et al. “Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the UK, Italy and Slovenia. 2021.
Article contains a study constructed using a survey to determine the impact of coronavirus on the economy and society in several countries: Thailand, Malaysia, the UK, Italy, and Slovenia. The study’s authors constructed a survey to determine which effects of COVID-19 were of most concern to respondents. According to the results, social groups by age and education were most affected by the pandemic (Osterrieder et al.). The authors note that respondents were most often concerned about their social lives and physical and mental health. In addition, respondents with primary/secondary education reported being most concerned about housing and access to food; those with higher education thought they would get by quickly.
The source contributes to understanding how people view different areas of their lives and their importance to them. The statistics contained for other countries provide insight into how the coronavirus affected people of different social statuses. The source belongs to the journal BMJ Open, which includes original research that is peer-reviewed and verified. The credibility and relevance of the head are confirmed by open access to peer-reviewed information and funding from leading universities.
Pereznieto, P. and Oehler, I. Social Costs of the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2021
Paper discusses the social costs incurred during the pandemic. The source drew attention to how the social impact of the coronavirus was shaped. For example, the sharply increased poverty levels: more than 88 million people were unemployed and probably homeless. Moreover, according to regional studies, the social impact of COVID-19 was most vital in South Asia, where wages per day were only $3.2 (Pereznieto and Oehler 9). The authors point out that this led to a sharp decline in health care services: people could not go to specialists, and their quality of life suffered. In addition, the paper contains data that indicates the suffering of vulnerable social groups – mainly children who have not even received primary education.
The source contributes to an understanding of the globalized social consequences of the pandemic. It traces how and why post-coronavirus problems developed. The head’s credibility is not in doubt because it was vetted and excerpted by The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, an independent socio-economic organization. The findings in the paper are accurate and authoritative because they are highly correlated with relevant independent data.
Darvas, Zsolt. The Unequal Inequality Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic. 2021.
An equally important aspect of the social impact of the pandemic is the deterioration in inequality. Darvas’s research report shows that in 2020 global income inequality indices have raised significantly, leading to stratification and the elimination of the middle class (Darvas 10). Developed countries were less affected, but they nevertheless contributed to the global deterioration. The authors point out that the lack of instruments to regulate this situation will lead to social clashes in the workplace and even greater stigmatization of manual labor. Rehabilitation from the effects of the pandemic will take much longer than anticipated because states will not have the resources to educate their affected employees.
The source contributes to knowledge about how the pandemic has contributed to social inequality due to income disparities. In addition, the authors provide various scenarios for the effects of the pandemic. The source was published by Bruegel Publishers, funded by the Institute of Economics. The work’s credibility is unquestionable because it contains specific goals, which were provided with the help of precise measurement criteria and authoritative literature.
Saladino, Valeria et al. The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being. 2020.
The authors of the article examine the impact of COVID-19 on the psychological and social conditions of the population. The findings demonstrate that people have virtually stopped experiencing empathy because of social distance and security measures. Solidarity and humanitarian activities were performed mainly because of a sense of duty rather than actual social suffering (Saladino et al.). The authors suggest that this problem could be solved through telepsychology, which would help people regain awareness of them as part of society. They point out that forces should be directed toward secondary prevention per the new conditions and the use of digital devices. In addition, the article looks at neurosociology as one of the most powerful tools for addressing the general decline of empathy in society.
The source contributes to an understanding of what ways to address the social consequences of the pandemic might be. The effectiveness of telepsychology is discussed thoroughly and prospectively, which makes the source relevant to the research. In addition, this article has all the credibility indicators: it demonstrates an independent, complete study, with perspectives for solving the problem included. The source is relevant and valid because it has many statistical indicators and verified third-party studies.
Sampaio, Mariana et al. Therapists Make the Switch to Telepsychology to Safely Continue Treating Their Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Virtual Reality Telepsychology May Be Next. 2021.
The article provides an extensive review of opinions on telemedicine and telepsychology, which are now seen as a way to solve society’s social problems. The authors note that therapists have become more prone to burnout and stress despite decreasing hospitalizations and referrals to a therapist (Sampaio et al.). Therapists cannot cope with the enormous increase in workload and further distance themselves from patients, which exacerbates the general social level of empathy and compassion. The authors believe that other ways of implementing information technology for human contact are needed because, under these conditions, it has not yet solved the problem of people’s global social distancing.
The source under study is an extensive and credible review that contributes to the understanding that the solution cannot be viewed in a one-sided manner. While Saladino et al.’s article looks at the merits of telepsychology; this source allows us to look at the answer from a different angle. The research is ethical and relevant and results from the processing of valid, statistically validated data. In addition, the research was conducted in collaboration with a charitable foundation and on a grant basis, which enhances its credibility.
Long, Emily et al. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on social relationships and health. 2021.
This article examines four areas of the social segment that have been most affected by the pandemic. These are social networks, support, social interaction, and support. First, the authors provide different perspectives on social networks: They point out how not all students have adapted to the new conditions despite stereotyping. In addition, they point out that some groups, on the contrary, found it more challenging to absorb social networking connections. Social support is also seen from two perspectives (Long et al.). On the one hand, it was expressed in the limitation of spontaneous interactions at the regional level; on the other hand. The restrictions served to develop local contacts that helped people more.
The source provides current information on how the social consequences of the pandemic can be viewed and generates a diverse response to them. In addition, this article has validity and relevance criteria. The source has specific objectives and measurable criteria that allow the information to be classified as highly credible. The article essay is also the result of sharing a group of researchers with extensive publication lists and a degree in the social sciences.
Bavel, van Jay J. et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. 2020.
The authors’ review provides information on what tools can be used to regulate social and economic relations after a pandemic. The article draws attention to how social isolation can be controlled and suggests looking at social distancing as an opportunity to remove unnecessary interactions. In addition, the authors offer a move toward closer cooperation within groups so that people can carry individual values and collectivism (Bavel et al.). The study establishes that the excess of local interests over global ones can positively affect interactions between people and eliminate the leakage of empathy. The authors also suggest that relaxations in distancing can help maintain adequate cultural variability in society and can help to remedy post-pandemic stigma.
The source contributes to understanding how the social consequences can be addressed and which groups should be targeted for rehabilitation first. The article will be helpful for research because it reveals every social aspect in full detail. This makes it a reliable source of information; the accuracy, the specific goals, measurable criteria, and validity of the study allow it to be considered a relevant source.
Works Cited
Bavel, van Jay J. et al. “Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.” Nature Human Behaviour, no. 4, 2020, pp. 460–471.
Darvas, Zsolt. The Unequal Inequality Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Bruegel, 2021.
Long, Emily et al. “COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on social relationships and health.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 76, no. 2, 2021.
Mofijur, M. et al. “Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: Lessons learnt from a global pandemic.” Sustainable production and consumption, vol. 26, 2021, pp. 343-359.
Osterrieder, A. et al. “Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the UK, Italy and Slovenia.” BMJ Open, 2021.
Pereznieto, P. and Oehler, I. Social Costs of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, 2021.
Saladino, Valeria et al. “The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being.” Frontiers in Psychology, 2020.
Sampaio, Mariana et al. “Therapists Make the Switch to Telepsychology to Safely Continue Treating Their Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Virtual Reality Telepsychology May Be Next.” Frontiers in Psychology, 2021.