The most expedient thing about the article written by Blanding (2020) was that there is a great deal of ambiguity covering the usage of e-cigarettes. Despite the concurrent exposure to numerous health risks and benefits, many researchers seem to question the mostly negative impact of e-cigarettes and claim that proper controls could help prevent unhealthy communities and damaging smoking patterns. The thought-provoking concept regarding e-cigarettes is that there is a genuine disagreement between people committed to the advantages of vaping and researchers who come back to the negative instances of vaping from time to time. On the other hand, there are more potential physical assessment findings than just respiratory issues. Based on the information presented by Blanding (2020), it may be concluded that there is a threat of exposing one’s self to cardiovascular and lung diseases (in addition to asthma or cancer, for instance) in the case of vaping too often.
Clients who recurrently engage in vaping are much more prone to issues with behavioral health as well. Their predisposition to anxiety and depression is truly scary because e-cigarettes seem to cause a much more addictive dependence than regular smoking products. The problem here is that many clients might also switch to illegal cannabis oils, causing not only a worsening addictive condition but also lung injuries that could lead to demise. The majority of available resources dwelling on the vaping’s adverse effects point out the need to regulate e-cigarette usage nationally. To my mind, the best way to address illegal and abusive smoking patterns would be to identify the possible alternatives to existing tobacco delivery options and implement statewide legislation projects that would normalize the use of e-cigarettes or even conventional tobacco products.
Reference
Blanding, M. (2020). The e-cig quandary. Harvard Public Health Magazine. Web.