The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights

Introduction

The debate over the issue of abortion is intense and involves many doctors, ethicists, policymakers, and researchers all over the world. Medical journals are full of controversial articles which defend the perspectives of opponents or proponents of abortion. Hendricks convincingly argues against the expulsion of a fetus and presents a strong argument in his article, though the researcher ignores the crucial point of the personhood of a fetus.

Main body

On the one hand, Hendricks successfully presents his idea and answers to some objections to it. He does not discuss the question of whether a fetus is a person or not, as it is difficult to defend any of the positions. Instead, he concentrates on the fact that people consider giving a fetus FAS (Fetus Alcohol Syndrome) to be immoral. Therefore, according to the researcher, it is logical to think that killing a fetus is unethical as well (Hendricks, 2019). Hendricks also answers to common objections such as giving FAS is not immoral or killing better than torturing by proving their controversy; thus, the article appears to be impeccable.

On the other hand, his work has a significant weakness, as Hendricks does not pay attention to the question of the personhood of a fetus. FAS not only impairs a fetus but also spoils a person’s life, as it causes different physical and mental issues. However, abortion is an expulsion of a fetus, which does not harm an individual, as the author does not prove that a fetus is a person. Moreover, abortion can make a life of a pregnant woman better or even prevent her from pregnancy complications.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Hendricks’ article has strengths as well as weaknesses. The researcher presents a convincing argument and answers different objections to it with more evidence. Although, he cannot state that abortion is immoral because FAS is immoral, as the former harms nobody, while the latter spoils the lives of a mother and child. Therefore, Hendricks should prove that a fetus is a person at first and then make such a conclusion.

Reference

Hendricks, P. (2019). Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument. Bioethics, 33(2), 245-253.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, January 10). The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights. https://studycorgi.com/the-ethics-of-abortion-and-reproductive-rights/

Work Cited

"The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights." StudyCorgi, 10 Jan. 2022, studycorgi.com/the-ethics-of-abortion-and-reproductive-rights/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights'. 10 January.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights." January 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-ethics-of-abortion-and-reproductive-rights/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights." January 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-ethics-of-abortion-and-reproductive-rights/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights." January 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-ethics-of-abortion-and-reproductive-rights/.

This paper, “The Ethics of Abortion and Reproductive Rights”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.