The term resilience refers to the capacity of a system, group, or society exposed to risks to resist the consequences of a hazard in an efficient and timely manner. There are many concepts and activities that may be taken to lower the likelihood that a disaster will occur. Nevertheless, a response can take many other forms, such as an answer, an emotional response, or a reaction.
The community should act as the first responder in the event of a decline in regular operation in some regions as a consequence of damage. Capacity will be helpful during the reaction since the response is insufficient to handle the function change and harm in some areas (Gil-Rivas & Kilmer, 2016). The quantity of anything that can be generated or contained is referred to as its capacity (Gil-Rivas & Kilmer, 2016). It may be used to describe a person’s psychological ability to deal with such circumstances and regain their pre-disaster frame of mind.
The concept of local response capability was debated in the community from several perspectives. The government’s power to foresee, monitor, manage, and coordinate emergencies are referred to as its political emergency response capacity (Wang et al., 2022). From a healthcare standpoint, in order to stop the spread of illness, several countries have implemented and supported vaccines on the health front during the epidemic (Alkarani et al., 2021). From a psychological perspective, it is the capacity to retain resilience in mental health and preparedness for emergencies (Gil-Rivas & Kilmer, 2016). In education, communities, families, and schools receive training on disaster preparedness (Katada & Kanai, n.d.). Furthermore, the ability of a social group to quickly adapt to crises is defined as social response capacity or resilience. Additionally, local environmental responses can play a significant role in limiting the effects of climate change and safeguarding natural resources (Tompkins & Neil Adger, 2005). Finally, preparing and equipping the population to be better prepared to respond to, handle, and recover from a crisis is known as building capacity.
Hence, response capability may be found in institutions, people, and organizations and can be impacted by both the institutional context and the choices and actions of the person. As a result, the requirement for resources, the distribution of risk, the institutions necessary for social learning, and the capacity for change may all be combined to expound on the reaction capacity. In other words, increasing reaction capacity could make it easier to react to change.
References
Alkarani, A. S., Ibrahem, A. A., Alasmari, H. A., & Alghamdi, R. A. (2021). Frontline nurses experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic – A Qualitative Study. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 10(38), 3327–3332. Web.
Gil-Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. P. (2016). Building community capacity and fostering disaster resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(12), 1318–1332. Web.
Katada, T., & Kanai, M. (n.d.). The school education to improve the disaster response capacity: A case of “Kamaishi Miracle.” JSTAGE, 11(5), 845-856. Web.
Tompkins, E. L., & Neil Adger, W. (2005). Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(6), 562–571. Web.
Wang, H., Ye, H., Liu, L., & Li, J. (2022). Evaluation and obstacle analysis of emergency response capability in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16). Web.