Duignan, B. (2021). Voter suppression. Britannica. Web.
This article is devoted to voter suppression in US history and politics. In this work, the author reveals the manifestations, causes, and ways to deal with this problem since the end of Reconstruction and up to the present. Particular attention is paid to various strategies of voter suppression in the United States, such as racial or party fraud (Duignan, 2021). Duignan also looks at the implications of changing electoral procedures amid COVID-19 and their potential impact on the issue (Duignan, 2021). As a result of checking the source with the C.R.A.A.P.O. test, it scored a 40.
The article is published in Britannica, which is a reliable source of dynamic and constantly updated information. The article’s author is an expert in the fields of philosophy, law, social science, politics, political theory, and religion. He is also the author of several scientific publications and books in the field of politics and philosophy, which suggests an appropriate level of reliability for the chosen source. The limitation is that the author does not indicate references. However, all the facts and documents mentioned in the article can be found and verified. The relevance of the selected source to study is that it addresses multiple facts on voter suppression in the South and compares it to voting rights in the Northern states. The historical context provided by this source gives a deeper understanding of the topic under study.
Harris, A. (2022). 5 ways Texas suppresses the vote — and how to make your vote count. American Civil Liberties Union of Texas.
The source is related to the study of current problems in ensuring equal elections in the state of Texas. The author highlights and analyzes several factors that hinder fair elections and encourage voter suppression, such as the lack of online voter registration, strict restrictions on those who can vote by mail, limited assistance to voters with disabilities, and other factors (Harris, 2022). This article also provides recommendations and ideas for overcoming these problems.
The article is published on the website of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas, which is the leading civil rights organization in the state. The author of the article holds a Bachelor of Arts and Juris Doctor from the University of Texas. The author’s work focuses on combating voter suppression in communities disproportionately affected by the criminal justice system. This allows us to assume that the author has sufficient experience and knowledge in the field of electoral law and that the source is credible. This article scored a 40 on the C.R.A.A.P.O. test. The relevance of the source is that it provides key facts that voter suppression is being practiced in the state of Texas today. The author’s view on legal or extralegal acts designed to bar members of a specific ethnic, racial, religious, or political group from voting or registering to vote is valuable for study.
Slattery, J. (2021). Texas voting law is just the latest in voter suppression efforts. Bloomberg Law.
In this article, the author analyzes how Senate Bill 1 affects elections and imposes more barriers to voting. The author examines individual positions of Senate Bill 1, such as interactions with voters in the presence of a ballot or election audits (Slattery, 2021). The article investigates their potential impact on voter suppression and long-term consequences for the electoral system.
The article is published on the Bloomberg Law website, where editors analyze the reliability and truthfulness of the information published. The author is a senior staff attorney who has several published articles and considerable practical experience as a civil rights attorney in Texas. On the C.R.A.A.P.O test, this article scored 36, making it an average source to use. The research relevance lies in the detailed analysis of the tightening of the electoral process and its complex consequences, especially for voter suppression.