Introduction
In recent years, there has been a significant leap in the development of Internet technologies, enabling a true revolution in Internet search and even the creation of a separate market, transforming Internet search from a segment of the IT market into an entire industry in which specialized companies operate. Google is the world’s largest Internet search engine, with a nearly 65% market share(Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). At the same time, the market’s growth rate is exceptional due to its high dynamics and stability. Even throughout the crisis, the market rose by a little less than 9% (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019).
The global search engine industry is now expected to be worth $70 billion, up from a little over $7 billion in 2007 (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). More than 70% of this money is spent on contextual advertising, and the average annual growth rate surpasses 12% (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). For my analysis, I chose the media business of Yahoo, as it operates in Saudi Arabia and also has a vast potential.
The Historical, Social, and Economic Context of the Business
History of Journalism
One of the primary purposes of journalism’s development, as evident in its progress, was to meet people’s informational needs regarding social concerns fully. Even in prehistoric times, man acted as a means of communication; shamans, soothsayers, and oracles conveyed diverse information, while rock carvings, parchment, and clay tablets were used to record it. Most academics today agree that the first newspapers, which were printed in Rome in the fifth century BC but did not resemble modern newspapers until Julius Caesar’s reign (c. 60 BC), marked the commencement of the press (Costera Meijer, 2021). The most well-known is the Acta Diurna, a daily report. There is also evidence of ancient literature throughout Asia.
Private letters, official communications, bulls, rescripts, proclamations, lectures, directions, biographies, histories, and travelogues were all translated into ancient languages. As print journalism gained popularity, a system of journalistic genres emerged. Brochures, news stories, and reports were among the earliest. Then, other newspaper and magazine subgenres emerged.
Throughout the Middle Ages, a period of religious and clerical rule, the scope of innovation was severely limited. The feudal-monarchical type reflects the society’s low degree of economic development as well as the beginning of the transition from a subsistence economy to commodity-money relations. Trade expansion requires the exchange of information on items, ship arrivals, and prices.
In the nineteenth century, journalism emerged as an essential social, political, and economic force. Because 80% of the press was clearly political and sociopolitical in nature, it became a vehicle for political confrontation (Shevchenko, 2020). Traditionally, the press was separated between high-quality and popular outlets.
Background of Yahoo!
Yahoo! is a world-renowned IT firm based in the United States that owns the world’s second most popular search engine. In addition, the brand provided a vast range of supplementary services to search engine users, which were organized in the Yahoo! Directory. Yahoo! Mail is the most well-known and oldest service. Jerry Young and David Fillo, two friends, built a structured directory website in 1994 (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). It included links to websites the creators loved – there were no grand goals, and this site was developed solely for their own use. However, due to the convenience of this service, its popularity grew over time.
In 1995, the friends recognized the commercial potential and dropped out of school, devoting more time to their children. The domain name yahoo.com was registered at that time. The number of connections to sites surpassed 10,000, and the daily visitor count reached 100,000. The project was developed with a $2 million investment (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). MyYahoo, a personalized homepage that included news, weather information, stock market summary, and other relevant information for users, was released in 1996.
Since then, Yahoo! has evolved into more than simply a search engine, becoming a full-fledged portal with a home page for millions of users. Due to the company’s rapid growth, its shares were listed on the stock exchange. In 1998, the corporation acquired the Rocketmail service, leading to the development of its own Yahoo! Mail. The company’s market worth soon surpassed $100 billion (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). At the time, it was the costliest IT firm on the planet.
The company’s problems began in 2000 when the price of Google’s stock began to plummet. Yahoo! Help. He resorted to significant layoffs and a change in the company’s leadership. Terry Semel, the new CEO, attempted to restructure the company’s operations and structure; however, Yahoo!’s advertising business ultimately failed. Inktomi, an Internet provider, was bought in December 2002, and Overture Services, a search engine advertising business, was acquired in 2003 (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). This was done to boost its competitiveness against its most prominent opponent, Google.
Nonetheless, Google maintained its dominance in the search engine and Internet advertising markets. Microsoft has also declared an interest in entering this market niche. Terry Semel left as CEO in 2007, and Susan Decker, a prominent Wall Street analyst, was named president. Yahoo! has continued to disappoint investors. In January 2008, it was stated that 1,000 positions would be terminated. Microsoft sought to purchase Yahoo! for $44.6 billion in February 2008 (Ferdiansyah et al., 2019). However, three months later, Bill Gates’ business withdrew its offer, leaving the Yahoo! management unable to reach a deal.
Role of Media in Modern Society
The media has a tremendous influence on everyone’s lives. They are directed to the individual in all their social capacities: as a citizen, family member, representative of society, and local inhabitant. The media are often regarded as social systems for gathering, processing, and distributing information.
Mass information is intended for a broad, geographically dispersed audience. It is characterized by its regularity and speed of transmission, practically simultaneous consumption, indirect nature, and, to some extent, standardized content (Shevchenko, 2020). The information sent should always be of public interest. Its expansion is the essential aspect of mass spiritual communication of individuals, which originated alongside interpersonal communication at some point in humanity’s progress.
Yahoo!’s role is to disseminate information while also helping users find it. During financial crises, economic reforms, and periods of economic uncertainty, the media serves not only as a conduit for essential economic information, helping the populace navigate the economic crisis, but also shapes their economic behavior. Of course, the media in general, including television and Internet resources, has an impact on behavior and decision-making. The business media provides professional analysis on economic subjects and has the most significant impact on how people perceive the economy.
Dot-Com Bubble and Acquisitions
The corporation owes much of its quick ascent to the so-called dot-com bubble. Many entrepreneurs truly believed in the Internet’s transformative potential in the latter half of the 1990s. Entrepreneurs anticipated that by investing massive sums of money in the construction of Internet enterprises, they would be rewarded just for conducting business on the network.
Yahoo! was also heavily invested at the time. The site catalog rapidly evolved into a search engine, and it subsequently began to expand with additional services, becoming more than just a search engine but an Internet portal. For example, in 1997, Yahoo! purchased the RocketMail email service and renamed it Yahoo! Mail. That was the first takeover attempt.
Later, the firm acquired hundreds more startups, which were subsequently integrated into the platform. The dot-com boom burst in 2001. This is regarded as the “Dot-com crash” in Internet history. As it turned out, entrepreneurs and investors who believed in the Internet’s miracle vastly underestimated its true potential. Suddenly, it became clear that one marketing strategy was insufficient for running an internet firm.
Although Yahoo!, unlike many others, provided genuine services, it was also targeted. The firm weathered the storm and subsequently expanded its offerings. Microsoft offered $33 per share to acquire Yahoo! in 2008 (Tynan, 2018). If Jerry Young had accepted the offer, the total value of the transaction would have been around $45 billion. Despite this, he requested $37 per share. Steve Ballmer, the then-CEO of Microsoft, disagreed. A few months later, the economy collapsed, reducing the company’s worth to $21 billion (Tynan, 2018). Investors who wanted to sell Yahoo! were irritated by Yang’s rejection.
Marissa Meyer’s Leadership
According to some accounts, it was this conflict that prompted him to resign as the company’s CEO. Marissa Meyer, a Silicon Valley celebrity, took over as CEO on June 16, 2012 (Tynan, 2018). She has been named to Fortune magazine’s annual list of America’s 50 Most Powerful Women four times. Glamour magazine named her one of the year’s most beautiful women in 2009 (Tynan, 2018).
Meyer had very high expectations in general. Now, however, the CEO of Yahoo! is criticized by everyone, from investors to average employees of the firm. Meyer generated employee hostility when he barred all Yahoo! workers from working remotely in 2013(Tynan, 2018). Furthermore, the CEO implemented an appraisal system within the firm that compares an employee’s performance to that of their immediate coworkers.
As a result, no one wants to collaborate with successful specialists to avoid losing their background. Furthermore, according to the employees, management began to artificially exaggerate or underestimate the signs to modify the outcome to meet the expectations. It turns out that looking effective is far more essential than really being productive.
In general, owing to Marissa Meyer’s efforts at Yahoo!, it has become a pursuit of high grades. Meyer, according to colleagues, attempts to juggle too many balls at once and does not transfer power. For obvious reasons, investors are displeased with Yahoo!’s current actions.
Marissa Meyer has produced practically no accomplishments in two and a half years. As a result, big investors have just begun their own discussions with AOL, the American media holding company. Yahoo! will be divided if the firms reach an agreement. The assets will be transferred into a separate holding company, which will comprise the remaining shares of Alibaba Group and Yahoo! Japan. Yahoo! will be merged with AOL in its entirety (Tynan, 2018). Moreover, the new business will indeed not be called Yahoo!
Entrepreneurship
Media independence and freedom of expression have long been top considerations. For millennia, the degree of media freedom has been used to assess a country’s political and economic health. While the financial reliance of periodicals, television, radio, and the Internet on the commercial sector or government subsidies is the most potent regulator of information policy, the presence of political freedoms in a market environment is not always a guarantee that the media will be able to exploit them.
The media is often obliged to seek financial backing, which can conflict with their own preferences and principles of free journalism, as continually reflected in the content of their publications, ultimately leading to public opinion favoring the parties involved. These dynamics are particularly apparent in places where most media outlets are steadily losing money and becoming increasingly reliant on those who fund their operations.
Global digitization is being carried out through commercial activity, with many aspects of social life being restructured around digital communications and media infrastructures. Globalization is characterized by the rapid transmission of information worldwide, and the Internet has brought all human societies together in a virtual space, regardless of physical distances or national borders.
The advancement of information transmission methods has led to significant improvements in modern digital communications, enabling messages to be sent over various personal communication channels and computer systems. This resulted in a dramatic growth in the supply of media goods, from content to technological, assisted by the process of media digitalization, defined as the move from analog to digital forms of information transmission, processing, and storage.
Yahoo! was among the pioneers in the industry that started connecting the internet and media. Growing from a collection of website links into a search engine with additional services and advertisements highlights the company’s entrepreneurial roots. As discussed above, the corporation was first developed by two friends who recognized the potential of their product and tried to profit from it. However, their success was not long-lived due to external circumstances and the inability to compete with a much more structured and resourceful competition.
Thus, one may argue that entrepreneurship lies at the foundation of the company, and it was highly valued in the beginning stages. Some examples that support this point include the new features created at Yahoo! and subsequently used across the internet. Yahoo! marketers were the first ones to introduce a pay-per-click advertisement program, which is now considered a standard of internet ads. Yahoo! was among the creators of the modern internet, but it does not currently enjoy the fruits of its labor.
Networks and Media Businesses
Internal business communication is one of the key variables that influence a company’s performance. Everything from brand identity to profitability, consumer engagement, and staff happiness is affected. Media businesses construct their internal networks in a way that allows their efficacy to be tested, while external networks are utilized to propel the firm forward. They are responsible for shaping how the public perceives and understands businesses. It takes time to monitor each component carefully. However, if done appropriately, it can make a considerable contribution to corporate growth.
The internal network of Yahoo! was filled with projects and companies that were not interacting with one another on a level that would bring profits or help the business grow (Reynolds and Hallinan, 2021). Yahoo! acquired ventures but did not develop or enhance them, such as Tumblr or GeoCities; however, these ventures either failed financially or distanced themselves from the owner and became independent projects (Reynolds and Hallinan, 2021). As a result, the company’s internal network can be considered lackluster and disjointed.
The network is becoming increasingly significant as a system of technical and organizational-economic connections. Networks have emerged as the primary organizational structure of a post-industrial or information society. Economic actors establish both internal and external relationships through networking, which takes place in a range of cultural and national contexts. The external and commercial systems of Yahoo! can be viewed together, as the company primarily worked with advertisers and firms wanting a collaborative project for financial gain. Now, Yahoo! still partners with organizations and sponsors events in different industries, but it falls behind its main competitors in the news, search engine, and social network fields.
Theorists began to seriously and actively examine the merits of introducing networking principles of interaction in business, specifically in terms of approaches to examining internal management structures. The work of Forrester, describing new trends in the internal organization of large corporations around “centers of profit,” was one of the first foreign publications in this direction (Sholihin et al., 2020). The vector of the evolution of enterprise management structures shifted during the twentieth century from a linear structure to a functional one, then to a divisional structure, and ultimately to the application of a matrix concept and a network approach.
Pressure Points
Media freedom, independence, and plurality are vital components of freedom of information and speech in any functioning democracy. All other human rights must be safeguarded, which is dependent on media freedom. Torture, bigotry, corruption, and misuse of authority are all frequently highlighted by investigative journalism.
Persecution and limits on media freedom have been reported in several European nations. The media’s independence and plurality impede the numerous control and coercion processes that impact media diversity and content. Journalists are still imprisoned for doing their jobs. There have been reported cases of media harassment, violence, and murder. They have the final say on what a TV viewer should watch: how politics manifests itself.
Independent and trustworthy media are essential institutions in modern society. It is an important public control tool that contributes to better openness of governmental authorities and the fight against corruption. According to the authorities, this is not questioned, as they request such control and occasionally respond to the inadequacies discovered.
In practice, the authorities’ policy precludes the development of an independent media entity. The state’s negative influence is due to its goal to minimize criticism of itself. Not only are legal and administrative measures being implemented, but pressure is also being applied to owners and advertising. Over the last year, the media business has emerged as a pioneer in regulatory tightening.
The infusion of state and quasi-state funds into mainstream markets impedes the industry’s healthy growth. There are sectors where the price is set not by the actual cost of interaction with the audience, but rather by how strongly the governor, mayor, or corporate entity backs the relevant medium. Nobody is astonished by business strategies in which grants are recorded as revenue of media corporations (Din et al., 2021). The increasing economic dependence of the media on the state, as well as the expansion of the arsenal of penalties against those deemed unsavory, has led to a blurring of the functions of journalism. There is a trend of militarism in which the pen is equated with a stick, and the journalistic profession is merged with propaganda.
By eliminating independent media from the market, the state forces journalists to choose between propaganda, publicity, and activism. In the first situation, journalists become re-translators of material obtained from the media sponsor, losing the ability to verify and analyze the information. Journalists who prefer not to work under instructions often post their work on blogs, social networks, and smaller online platforms (Din et al., 2021). However, excessive activity does not benefit the profession because editorial norms of information verification do not adequately constrain such journalists, and they often lack access to databases. Propaganda and activism both harm high-quality journalism based on facts and all sides’ points of view.
The quality of communications is deteriorating: public funds are provided for maximum coverage, which necessitates quantitative statistics (titles, traffic volume, audience share, and, in rare cases, quotation index). State-sponsored media ventures increase (often undesired) copying and purchase traffic (including junk) (Din et al., 2021). The urge to share and quote triumphs drives public investment in spectacular and lucrative items.
At the same time, many media outlets do not hesitate to disregard essential news for their audiences, and this is not due to direct orders to “do not allow,” but instead to self-censorship. In the case of Yahoo!, the company should be aware of this pressure point when publishing any information – Yahoo! currently addresses this through its service, Yahoo! News. The strategy should be reconsidered, with the state renouncing the purchase of “information support” in the media in favor of supporting the sector as a whole. The most important thing is to halt, or rather abolish, the implementation of recent regulations that discourage investment and journalism, to ease entry into the market as far as possible, especially in TV, and to eliminate advertising limitations.
Ethical Concerns
Disagreements over global views and societal instability have resulted from irregularity or a lack of political correctness in publishing. As a result, discussions about media censorship, media courts, or any other type of media control, often instigated by law enforcement authorities, have become commonplace. The language of young media largely corresponds with the usual ethical difficulties associated with media language, such as conveying insults and humiliation, imposing jail norms, and distorting facts of national history and culture. The following are the international components. Manipulation in media discourse may involve, for example, presenting default, partial information, and biased selection of facts.
It is challenging to label media coverage of such occurrences as immoral, as some perceive it as a transgression of unwritten ethical principles. In contrast, others view it as a representation of a civic perspective or an author’s worldview. Ethics and legality in and for the media are a continuing source of worry for both attorneys and journalists. As a result, a relatively new scientific path, known as legal linguistics, is constantly evolving today at the intersection of law and linguistics, encompassing the linguistic analysis of contentious media materials.
Philologists analyze media texts using various linguistic methods at the request of courts or trial participants (claimant or defendant) and conclude the presence or absence of insult, the humiliation of honor and dignity, which translates the assessment of the journalist’s speaking activity from the ethical plane to the legal plane (Sholihin et al., 2020). If the insult is established, the journalist or the editorial team he represents is held administratively liable and must pay severe fines.
To this day, the primary responsibility of the journalist is to deliver accurate and valuable information to the public, ensuring that people are aware of and understand the events unfolding in the modern world. The establishment of ethical norms encourages the legalization of the media as the “fourth power”(Sholihin et al., 2020). However, most journalists see the standards as a source of inspiration rather than a device of constraint.
Colleagues are seeking shared goals that must be pursued jointly and are not focused on gaining pecuniary advantages (Din et al., 2021). The tension between the suggestion of ethical norms and the adoption of legal laws is explained by ethics and the right to the media. These ethical concerns relate to many services offered by Yahoo, as it serves as a primary source of information for users and readers of its news articles.
Another major ethical issue that the media company encounters is related to cybersecurity. As a business that stores user data in the form of accounts and emails, and a partner in advertising that often uses its clients’ financial data, Yahoo! bears significant responsibility for this information. In recent years, the corporation has struggled to maintain the security of this data, as numerous leaks have occurred within the company’s files.
In 2016, Yahoo! experienced one of the most significant data breaches in the history of digital media, a problem that significantly damaged the company’s reputation. The lack of responses after previous attacks likely led to this incident and exacerbated its consequences. Thus, it can be argued that Yahoo! does not pay sufficient attention to its current and past ethical issues and fails to address the dangers of the modern internet adequately.
Conclusion
The importance of the media in modern life cannot be overstated. Today, the mass media are among the most potent methods of influencing public and individual awareness, as well as shaping political life and culture, while also having a significant impact on the economy, both in terms of production and consumption. The media, through advertising, becomes both a tool for stimulating consumption and a vital route for disseminating information about new goods and services. Yahoo!’s history in this field is tumultuous and ultimately unsuccessful, although the company remains in existence.
The media sector amasses significant resources by generating both physical (newspapers, periodicals, individual media carriers storing music records, television shows, and films) and intangible (intellectual property) items. Several key kinds can be found among the latter. First, the media’s material consists of news and opinions.
Second, media content components such as meanings, myths, pictures, and ideology. The media frequently generate and mediate them. Third, it is the audience itself, which is produced by the media to provide advertisers, who, in exchange for the supply of this “service,” supply the media corporations with their primary source of income: advertising revenue. Thus, the audience is a natural and necessary byproduct of media activity formed in response to advertising demand.
In the media economy, the audience is considered both a consumer and a product. This is a key element of the media sector that sets it apart from others, transforming the mass media into a duplicating market for products and services. The content is the product, while the service is the audience’s “offering” to advertising. Changes in society since the second part of the twentieth century have drastically altered the media audience. In essence, we are discussing the emergence of qualitatively new traits resulting from the growth of economic, cultural, and educational institutions, as well as local and global political processes.
According to several scholars, the character of modern post-industrial or information society has undergone considerable transformation: mass industrial output in the economy is being replaced by production focused on meeting the demands of individual customers. It is increasingly referred to as customized production, implying that it is explicitly focused on the consumer. Management structures are evolving from inflexible hierarchies to flexible network structures, and the significance of communication and information and communication technologies (ICT) in business is growing considerably, becoming a required component of production. All of this has an immediate influence on the media economy. The bulk of production in the new information society is centered on the intangible domain, and the cluster of content businesses that forms in the process, with the media sector taking the lead, becomes one of the essential roles.
Reference List
Costera Meijer, I. (2021) ‘What is valuable journalism? Three key experiences and their challenges for journalism scholars and practitioners‘, Digital Journalism, 10(2), pp. 230–252.
Din, M.Z., Gillani, A.H. and Pirzada, G. (2021) ‘Private social media companies, governments and global population: challenges and prospects for the implementation of human rights regulations’, Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 03(03), pp. 544–556.
Edwards, B. (2019) ‘Cybersecurity oversight liability’, Georgia State University Law Review, 35(3), pp. 663-677.
Ferdiansyah, F. et al. (2019) ‘A LSTM-method for bitcoin price prediction: a case study Yahoo! Finance stock market‘, 2019 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (ICECOS).
Reynolds, C.J. and Hallinan, B. (2021) ‘The haunting of GeoCities and the politics of access control on the early Web‘, New Media & Society, 23(11), pp. 3268-3289.
Shevchenko, T. (2020) ‘Features of marketing research in the mass media business‘, Management and entrepreneurship: trends of development, 4(14), pp. 114–121.
Sholihin, M. et al. (2020) ‘A new way of teaching business ethics: the evaluation of virtual reality-based learning media‘, The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), p. 100428.
Tynan, D. (2018) The history of Yahoo, and how it went from phenom to has-been.