The case study indicates that Linda Forbes is a self-driven, hardworking, and motivated person who seeks to achieve her professional and career goals. Forbes has managed to develop a conclusive study that explores the prospects of the autonomous transportation industry. The research director at HIG Capital LLC, Norman Driver, is already contented with her gains and achievements. The agreement established between the company and Forbes appears to be symbiotic because she will realize her goals while at the same time supporting the organization’s agenda (Hasnas 298). The dilemma has emerged after Dylan Lubbock has approached Forbes to provide a more comprehensive report for Crosslink Capital.
If I were in Linda Forbes, I would focus on the original agreement since it is the most acceptable thing to do (Schwartz 32). It would be appropriate to tell Dylan Lubbock that the proposal is dishonorable since she has been using HIG Capital LLC’s resources to conduct the study. The move can guide the CEO to realize how his suggestion might affect Forbes’ relationship with HIG Capital LLC.
Employees should uphold the best values and ethical principles whenever supporting the needs of their respective firms. Linda Forbes should be on the frontline to support the goals and objectives of HIG Capital LLC. The agreement between the company and the employee is binding. This means that Forbes should focus on the most apposite actions that would support the agreement (Schwartz 47). By so doing, Forbes will support the mission of the targeted company.
Ethical theory discourages the application of predatory practices, especially in the world of business. This situation and understanding would persuade Forbes to decline the offer. This resolution is necessary because the offer has the potential to affect the firm’s business model. Linda Forbes should complete the research study sponsored by HIG Capital LLC before establishing a new relationship with Crosslink Capital. The guiding principle for this argument is that a given action should be pursued if only it delivers positive or desirable outcomes (Hasnas 291). Determinations should be deemed ethical if they would be favorable to the greatest number of people. Any attempt to sign a deal with Dylan Lubbock will undermine the company’s objectives.
Failing to agree with Lubbock is the most appropriate ethical decision. This action is desirable since it seeks to support what ought to be right. A predatory practice in the world of business is something unethical (Joseph 14). Being in Linda Forbes’ shoes, I will mainly focus on my initial goals while at the same time supporting the goals of the targeted company. The move will make it easier for Forbes to realize her potential.
Works Cited
Hasnas, John. “Teaching Business Ethics: The Principles Approach.” Journal of Business Ethics Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2013, pp. 275-304.
Joseph, George. “Theoretical Perspectives on Ethical Dilemmas in Globalization and International Taxation.” Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, vol. 17, no. 3, 2016, pp. 1-37.
Schwartz, Mark S. Business Ethics: An Ethical Decision-Making Approach. Wiley, 2017.