Print Сite this

Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital

Capital budgeting analysis addresses the predicament of strategic long-standing investment decisions. It entails analyzing, evaluating and deciding whether resources should be allocated to a venture or not. In addition, it analyzes costs and benefits associated with potential investment expenditure (Pamela & Frank, 2002). This work will attempt to carry out a capital budget analysis for the $ 1 million new research cancer that Trinity Hospital considers putting up.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $16.05 $11/page
308 certified writers online
Learn More

Trinity Hospital is considering putting up a new $ 1million cancer research wing in five years’ time. For the computations, the initial investment cost is $ 1 million, which will be invested wholly at the beginning of the first year. The amount will be used to purchase machinery and equipment for the cancer center and some will cater for operational costs. The project is estimated to have a useful life of 10 years. Other cash outflows for years 1 to 10 are expected to be $120,000 per annum. The expected cash flow is $400,000 per year from year 1 to 10. We shall assume that all cash flows are after-tax and no cash flow is expected after year 10. Further, it is assumed that the residue value for types of machinery will be zero. The required rate of return will be 10%. The techniques for capital budget analysis include the use of net present value (Pamela & Frank, 2002). From the table below, the project would generate a positive net present value of $654,980.32. Therefore, it is considered feasible. The table below gives the computation of the net present value for the cancer center.

Table of net present value

Table 1.0

Year Cash inflows
$
Cash Outflows
$
Net Cash
Flow
Discounting factor at 10% Present Value of Net Cash flows Cumulative
Present value of Net cash flows
0 0 1,000,000 -1,000,000 0.909091 -909,091.00 -909,091.00
1 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.826446 231,404.88 -677,686.12
2 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.751315 210,368.20 -467,317.92
3 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.683013 191,243.64 -276,074.28
4 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.620921 173,857.88 -102,216.40
5 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.564474 158,052.72 55,836.32
6 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.513158 143,684.24 199,520.56
7 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.466507 130,621.96 330,142.52
8 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.424098 118,747.44 448,889.96
9 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.385543 107,952.04 556,842.00
10 400,000 120,000 280,000 0.350494 98,138.32 654,980.32
4,000,000 2,200,000 1,800,000 654,980.32

Graph showing trend of net cash flow and discounted net cash flow

Graph
Graph 1.0

Another approach is the payback period which considers the length of time that it takes for a project to recoup its initial cost out of the cash receipts that it generates (Kent & Philip, 2011). It is arrived at by dividing investment with net annual cash inflow.

Initial investment cost       $1,000,000

Net annual cash flows         $ 280,000

Get your
100% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours
Learn More

Period = 1,000,000/280,000

The project will take four years to recoup its initial investment. A project with a shorter payback period is considered viable. However, this method does not take into consideration the time value of money. Discounted payback period approach is preferred to the payback period. It computes the length of time required to recover the initial cash outflow from the discounted future cash inflows, the present value of cash inflows is cumulated until they equal the initial investment. This method considers the time value of money. However, it does not take into account the profitability of a project (Pamela & Frank, 2002).

Due to the downswing in the economy, management may be skeptical about investing in the cancer center. This can be attributed to limited capital due to the expected reduction in revenues. From the above capital budget analysis, we can deduce that investment in the cancer center would be profitable. The project will generate a positive net present value amounting to $654,980.32 with a payback period is of 4years. The profitability index is 1.56. Since the project is feasible, management should inject into in to it.

References

Kent, B. & Philip, E. (2011). Capital investment choice. Capital budgeting valuation, Alabama: Cangage

Pamela, P. & Frank, J. (2002). Capital budgeting evaluation technique. Capital budgeting, New York: Tailor and Sons

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, April 14). Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, April 14). Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital. https://studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/

Work Cited

"Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital." StudyCorgi, 14 Apr. 2022, studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

1. StudyCorgi. "Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital." April 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital." April 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital." April 14, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/capital-budgeting-analysis-for-trinity-hospital/.

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Capital Budgeting Analysis for Trinity Hospital'. 14 April.

This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.

If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal.