Introduction
Leadership involves personal guidance and effectively guiding other people. Group leadership includes providing focus and directions to a specific team working towards a common goal. Teaching and facilitating the team’s actions and accepting responsibilities for the group’s outcome efforts constitutes effective leadership. I believe that minor improvements are the best, and people should always be given an opportunity and chance to make their improvements. Consequently, I use my communication skills and persuasiveness to influence others and provide an opportunity. My charismatic leadership style creates a conducive environment for any engagements. The humanistic theoretical approach suits my values and beliefs. Although I am always an effective leader, I often find it hard to unite a divided group. Therefore, I would work best with a co-leader who is a creative thinker, problem-solver, and who effectively communicates with other people.
Personal Believes and Values
People are subject to failures since they are not always perfect in everything they do. Judging people based on their weaknesses discourages them and lowers their self-esteem. Low self-esteem could lead to depression and other mental disorders, inhibiting the group’s performance and effectiveness. Therefore, people should always be given equal opportunities and chances to improve on their losses. The failures might involve failing in a test, missing a lucrative job opportunity, and getting rejected in an interview. I believe that failures build great men stronger than before, and any loss would bring positive outcomes someday. As a group leader, my belief enables me to treat all my group members equally without favor and judge their improvements, not their cognitive capacity. Allowing everyone to improve is significant to the individuals and the group. Giving everyone an opportunity for personal development creates a sense of belonging and reduces isolation among group members (Rahn et al., 2021). Furthermore, teamwork, idea generation, and creativity are enhanced in an equal environment. Believing that everyone deserves an opportunity to grow has positively impacted my group through enhanced teamwork and creativity.
Leadership Style
Connecting with people on a deep level is valuable for an organization amidst challenges and group crises. I identify myself with a charismatic leadership style since it involves understanding people’s needs. Charismatic leaders use their unique communication skills, persuasiveness, and charm to influence others. As a strong communicator, empathetic, and confident, I often encourage my team to take challenges without fear. Charismatic leadership is beneficial to an organization and leads to improved team performance. The leadership style is inspirational and motivating since it encourages and accommodates every team member regardless of their capabilities and social status. Teamwork is inspired through the leadership style due to its collaborative nature. Charismatic leaders hear and understand their followers, creating a movement towards positive change (Sy et al., 2018). charismatic leadership can become self-serving and viewed as disingenuous (Fragouli, 2018). Charismatic leaders encourage teamwork and group improvements but can be considered ingenious and self-serving.
Theoretical Approach
Every person has unique potential and abilities and should be considered an individual compared to others. The humanistic approach enables a group leader to focus and help people overcome their challenges through personal growth (Arnold & Foncubierta, 2021, p. 37). The approach ignores a person’s wrongs or failures that might encumber their awareness and discourage them from reaching their potential. Personal responsibility and individual choice are encouraged through the approach. Particular problems are solved at individual levels enabling self-fulfillment. The approach involves narrative and gestalt therapies that focus on self-reflection. Therapy identifies people’s values and skills from their individual stories and experiences. In contrast, gestalt therapy focuses on their current life rather than their past (Malchiodi, 2020). I prefer the humanistic approach to others since it is in tandem with charismatic leadership qualities.
Challenging Leadership Aspect
Inspiring others is beneficial among the team members, but it is challenging since some people lack interest and have different perspectives. Others require their interest in the subject matter, pursuing them to take action. Low self-esteem is common among people growing up in cruel environments. The consequent low self-confidence leads to poor relationships, making it difficult to assert oneself. Optimism about success encourages people to act and stay inspired, while achievement anxiety encumbers inspiration. Inspiring others can be difficult since it requires understanding people’s emotions and interests that are difficult to identify. People might be motivated but have diverse interests that I may not be good at (Sy et al., 2018). Shifting my interest focus to fit their claims could be challenging to my personality and others. As for a leader, it is the most challenging aspect since it involves understanding people from their diverse perspectives and may include shifting my interest.
Co-Leader
Co-leadership is beneficial since it allows collaborative culture and enhances intelligent solutions. An effective co-leader is significant for quality leadership and a conducive working environment. Choosing a co-leader, I consider three essential aspects: effective communication, problem-solver, and creative thinker. An effective communicator is an active listener, friendly, shares feedback, and respects group members. Problem-solver helps understand members’ problems and can help me solve personal problems. Creative thinking is an effective way of coming up with reasonable and innovative solutions. A creative, problem-solving, and effective co-leader presents several advantages to a team.
Advantages of Co-Leader
While effective co-leaders help other group leaders overcome problems, they are beneficial to other group members. Creative co-leaders help the team members solve unique problems through unity. A creative co-leader intervenes whenever all other group members are unable to solve a problem. The leader will encourage the members to work as a team through problem identification and a solution-thinking process. Consequently, teamwork is encouraged, promoting the team’s productivity. An effective communicating co-leader will ease the organization’s operations. The co-leader will communicate with the people in a manner that they understand. In the absence of the group leader, the co-leader would promote unity and effective work relationship in a team. Consequently, the team will stop being overdependent on one leader. The members will effectively work with the co-leader like their preferred group leader. A co-leader is significant to a team since he promotes unity, friendliness, and effective team’s operations in the absence of other leaders.
Conclusion
Effective leadership is crucial for personal and group growth, and it involves friendly interaction with others. Leadership style is significant in creating a social-friendly environment that inspires others. Leadership style consists of believing in other people’s growth and improvement without prejudice against their past and failures. A humanistic approach when solving group problems helps develop charismatic qualities. Others may be challenging, especially when they are not interested in the subject idea due to low self-esteem, pessimism about success, and achievement anxiety. Creative thinking and problem-solving skills are significant in helping my peers identify problems and make sensible solutions. Furthermore, effective communication skills are essential when addressing the challenges. Since I cannot singly dispense my leadership roles, I prefer a leader who is creative and innovative. Therefore, a co-leader who can help me solve my peers’ problems is crucial for my followers’ improvements.
References
Arnold, J., & Foncubierta, J. M. (2021). The Humanistic Approach. The Routledge Handbook of the Psychology of Language Learning and Teaching, 36-47. Web.
Fragouli, E. (2018). Dark side of charisma and charismatic leadership. Business and Management Review, 9(4), 298-307. Web.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2020). Trauma and expressive arts therapy: Brain, body, and imagination in the healing process. Publications.
Rahn, G., Martiny, S. E., & Nikitin, J. (2021). Feeling out of place: Internalized age stereotypes are associated with older employees’ sense of belonging and social motivation. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(1), 61-77. Web.
Sy, T., Horton, C., & Riggio, R. (2018). Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 58-69. Web.