Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide

Introduction

In nursing, nurses and practitioners play a significant role in providing care for patients at the end-of-life stage across various healthcare settings. Their role is to provide expert care throughout the continuum of life and towards the end of the patient’s life (Lachman, 2010). They manage the bio-psychosocial as well as spiritual needs of terminally ill patients and their families.

However, working with terminally ill patients and those heading towards death (especially those experiencing great pain) is a difficult situation that raises several ethical, moral, and legal issues (Lachman, 2010). Among the most important issues is the idea of “hastened death” (Ersek, 2008). In my case, the ethical, legal, and moral dilemma arises because I am supposed to respect the patient’s decision, yet I must protect human life, inform the family members and avoid physician-assisted suicide.

The ethical, moral, and legal issues arising in nurse-assisted suicide

When the patient requests her nurse to assist her in committing suicide or provide the appropriate environment to take the action, the nurse should consider several legal, ethical and moral issues before making the appropriate decision (Ersek, 2008). Notably, the consequences of allowing the patient to commit suicide, whether assisted or not, are clear because the nurse is aware of the patient’s intention and he is supposed to provide the patient with the required support during her end-of-life period (Lachman, 2010).

First, in most American states, it is not a crime to commit suicide. Most of these laws are based on the notion that humans have the right to choose what to do with life, provided that their actions do not cause harm to someone else (Ersek, 2008). Nevertheless, most states consider aiding an individual or facilitating a person to commit suicide as a criminal act. Humans have a duty of care to protect life. An individual who witnesses a person committing suicide and takes no action to protect the life of the person has committed a crime (Ersek, 2008). Therefore, my patient has the right to choose death to relieve pain and suffering. However, the law prohibits me from assisting the patient or providing her with the appropriate environment for committing suicide. As such, a legal dilemma arises.

Secondly, an ethical and moral dilemma is likely to arise because I must protect my precious life and provide the best possible care, but it is also my moral duty to respect the client’s decision. According to Hudson, Schofield, and Kelly (2006), humans are obliged to ensure that their colleagues are relieved of their suffering and pain humanely. In addition, it is the role of society to ensure that every person’s dignity is respected. Morally, I must ensure that the only remaining option in relieving the pain is considered. In this case, death is the only option open to her. In particular, the patient’s choice must be respected (Lachman, 2010).

Nevertheless, we have a moral duty to protect and respect life because it is precious. No man can create life. Therefore, no man should destroy life. If the nurse allows the patient to commit suicide, he violates the fundamental duty of respecting and respecting life at all costs.

Ethically, the act of letting the patient commit suicide is partly correct because it respects her choice and decision, including her request not to disclose the intentions to her family (Lachman, 2010). Nevertheless, failing to inform the family is unethical because the role of the nurse is to ensure that family members are involved in making decisions involving the patient’s care and life.

Conclusion

In this case, the most appropriate action is to discourage the patient from going on with her plans. Instead, she should be encouraged to discuss the issue with her family members in the presence of the nurse and psychologists.

References

Ersek, M. (2008). The continuing challenge of assisted death. J Hosp Palliat Nurs, 6(1), 46-59.

Hudson, P. L., Schofield, P., & Kelly, B. (2006). Responding to desire to die statements from patients with advanced disease: recommendations for health professionals. Pall Med, 20(2), 703-710.

Lachman, V. D. (2010). Physician-assisted suicide: Compassionate liberation or murder? MedSurg, Journal, 19(2), 121–125.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, January 2). Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide. https://studycorgi.com/ethical-moral-and-legal-issues-in-assisted-suicide/

Work Cited

"Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide." StudyCorgi, 2 Jan. 2022, studycorgi.com/ethical-moral-and-legal-issues-in-assisted-suicide/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide'. 2 January.

1. StudyCorgi. "Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide." January 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ethical-moral-and-legal-issues-in-assisted-suicide/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide." January 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ethical-moral-and-legal-issues-in-assisted-suicide/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide." January 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ethical-moral-and-legal-issues-in-assisted-suicide/.

This paper, “Ethical, Moral and Legal Issues in Assisted Suicide”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.