Abstract
Generally, business organization organizations require proper guidelines and well-established organizational goals towards achieving. Through strategic planning (SP), the companies are capable of formulating the needed objectives for the given entity. During the process of making and implementing the proposed goals, organizational leadership plays central to ensure efficacy in the various steps involved. Some of the key functions of leadership in SP encompass understanding the context, comprehending the involved stakeholders including the respective leader, sponsoring the process, facilitating the procedure and enforcing norms, settling possible conflicts, and managing conflicts. Effective execution of the mentioned leadership roles will allow the organizational management to meet the set long-term goals thus achieving the vision of the business entity.
Introduction
The term paper will examine five key leadership roles that are crucial to the SP. The focus will be on how leaders promote knowledge of the SP context, elaborating on the importance of understanding people involved in SP processes, examining the sponsoring procedures, and enhancing the engagement and significance of establishing and maintaining norms. The work will depict the ability to utilize the class readings to develop a properly analyzed paper capturing key details and personal thoughts towards the leadership roles in SP.
Leadership Roles for Strategic Planning
Leaders play a significant role in the SP in business organizations. The management ensures the people involved in the process have a clear understanding of the SP through formulating and communicating the goals of the program. To enhance efficacy in SP, leadership roles encompass understanding the context of SP, comprehending the stakeholders, sponsoring the process, facilitating the procedures, and fostering the norms. The mentioned tasks allow the leader to have insight into SP thus promoting the success of the plan.
Understanding the Context of SP
Understanding the context of SP entails becoming familiar with the business environment. Furthermore, this phase involves a proper examination of the business environment such as the internal and external of the organization (Fernandez & Shaw, 2020). Through the process, managers can identify contemporary approaches and various ways by which the intended SP can be implemented to bring the desired change within the entity (Abualoush et al., 2018). By assessing the business environment, leaders will have the ability to develop effective and reliable plans that suits the specific needs of the.
Comprehending Involved Stakeholders and the Individual Leader
SP process involves dealing with different groups of people having varied opinions as well as understanding thus demanding the respective leader to have proper insight about the persons. The mentioned task is essential since it enables the organizational leader to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each of the associates. The phase involves examining the aspects such as interpersonal skills, individual strengths, and networks that are crucial in enabling stakeholders to have the capability to adapt and execute their responsibilities (Kools & George, 2020). By examining the aspects such as individual morals, compassion, and self-efficacy, the leader will be in a position to determine whether the involved team is worthy of the trust to deliver necessary services.
Sponsoring the SP Process
The sponsoring task is an essential phase of SP because it enables the managers to acquire funding, and even political protection to ensure the success of the development. The process entails informing the chief executive officers (CEO), the Minister in charge of the given sector, or the head of a government agency about the project (Bianchi et al., 2018). It is essential for the leader because it enhances the ability of the manager to acquire the necessary to facilitate the implementation of the SP.
Facilitating the SP Procedure
The facet entails enhancing the SP by the facilitators who have relevant skills. The individual provides the management with the required attention to ensure all the processes are sorted effectively (Cortellazzo et al., 2019). In this task, the people involved must have adequate insight into the organization’s issues, secrets, culture, and politics and further develop a proper connection with sponsors and other important individuals (Bryson, 2018). The initiators must explain how the SP works from the initial stages, plan the procedure effectively to the management board, allows people to do the tasks, and influence members to work towards completing the respective assignments.
Fostering Norms, Settling Disputes, and Managing Conflicts
Following variation in opinions among the people, stakeholders are more likely to have heated conversations leading to conflict. It is the responsibility of the manager to ethically resolve the disagreement to promote a common working group that facilitates the implementation of SP. The task is essential in SP because it enables the leaders to address and manage misunderstandings that can cause disputes. When the work environment is friendly, staff members will be able to contribute effectively to the SP thus enhancing effective outcomes (Bryson et al., 2018). The process entails using formal and informal approaches to tackle different issues, promoting integrity, and applying norms to given challenges in the company to facilitate peace and respect.
Conclusion
Leadership roles play significant roles in influencing the formulation and implementation of SP. Leaders undertake various tasks to ensure business organizations effectively benefit from the SP. For instance, the managers understand the context of SP to ensure they share the details with other stakeholders for clarity. Furthermore, it enables them to identify key internal and external factors that might impact the SP procedure. The facets ensure that the intended SP is implemented accordingly to meet the organization’s vision.
References
Abualoush, S., Bataineh, K., & Alrowwad, A. A. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279. Web.
Bianchi, M., Bagnasco, A., Bressan, V., Barisone, M., Timmins, F., Rossi, S., Pellegrini, R., Aleo, G. & Sasso, L. (2018). A review of the role of nurse leadership in promoting and sustaining evidence‐based practice. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(8), 918-932. Web.
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Leadership roles in making strategic planning work. In B. C. Crosby & J. M. Bryson (Eds.), Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
Bryson, J. M., Edwards, L. H., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2018). Getting strategic about strategic planning research. Public management review, 20(3), 317-339. Web.
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1938. Web.
Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The Coronavirus and COVID‐19. Journal of leadership Studies, 14(1), 39-45. Web.
Kools, M., & George, B. (2020). Debate: The learning organization—a key construct linking strategic planning and strategic management. Public Money & Management, 40(4), 262-264. Web.