NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting

Questions about Non-Parametric Procedures

Non-parametric tests are choice tests if the dataset does not assume normality in its distribution (for skewed data) (Field, 2009). In addition, data that does not heed to the assumption of homogeneity of variances calls for the use of non-parametric rather than parametric tests. The preference for non-parametric tests in place of parametric tests would also be based on the fact that non-parametric tests can give exact probabilities despite how the population from which the sample was taken is distributed. In addition, a non-parametric test is valuable for analyzing data with small samples sizes. When working with data that is classificatory, non-parametric tests become vary indispensable just as they are when working with data that is collected from a number of different populations. Data that is essentially arranged in ranks or data which gets more strength by arranging its numerical scores in ranks is suitably handled by non-parametric tests (Hebel, 2002).

Non-parametric tests are less powerful compared to their parametric counterparts, unless when testing significance when power is almost equal. The low power of non-parametric tests is attributed to the fact that the data is usually not normally distributed but instead, the data is skewed towards one direction. Parametric tests calculate their statistical power by use of formulas as well as dependence on tables as well as graphs and hence they have more power. On the other hand, non-parametric tests register a lower statistical power since power calculation is done in less straightforward approaches (Hebel, 2002).

Parametric Non-parametric
Dependent t-test Wilcoxon signed Ranks
Independent samples t-test Mann Whitney U
Repeated measures ANOVA (one-variable) Friedman’s Test
One-way ANOVA (independent) Kruskal Wallis H
Pearson Correlation Spearman Rho

Non-Parametric Tests for Parametric Versions

Wilcoxon’s Test

Table 1 indicates that there were 9 cases where creativity pre-test scores were greater than creativity post-test scores. In 28 cases, the creativity test scores were greater than creativity pre-test scores, and only in 3 cases were creativity pre-test scores equal to the creativity post-test scores. The Wilcoxon’s test was conducted to establish whether 40 students registered higher post-test scores than pre-test scores. It was identified that the difference between pre-test and post-test creativity scores were significantly different, Wilcoxon’s Z = -3.179, p =.001 (2-tailed significance) (Table 2). It was clear that post-test scores were significantly higher than creativity pre-test scores.

Mann Whitney U test

A new dataset (activity 5b.sav) was created from activity 5a.sav for use in between-subjects design. The new data set contained two variables only (creativity test scores while pre-test and post-test scores became the grouping variable). This new dataset was used to conduct a Mann-Whitney U test. A Mann Whitney U test was conducted on creativity test scores and it was identified that the average rank (pretest) scores were 36.22 whereas the mean rank scores for post-test scores were 44.78 (Table 3). This implies that creativity test scores conducted after the test tend to be higher than creativity test scores registered before the creativity test was conducted. Table 4 displays the Mann Whitney U which was conducted at a 2-tailed level of significance. The Mann Whitney U when applied to creativity test scores found that there existed no significant differences between the pre-test creativity scores and the post-test creativity scores, Mann Whitney U (N = 80) = 929.00, p =.10 which is greater than the significance level of.05.

Friedman’s test

On conducting a Friedman test to find out differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures based on the setting, the mean rank for systolic blood pressure was 3.00 while the mean rank for diastolic blood pressure was 2.00 (Table 5). The Friedman test was significant, Chi-Square (N = 30) = 60.00 p =.001 (Table 6). As a result, a Wilcoxon test was conducted as a follow-up test to enable pairwise comparisons and the Z score was significant, Wilcoxon Z = -4.784, p =.001 (Table 8). It was established that the median for systolic blood pressure was significantly greater than diastolic pressure, p <.05. In fact, in all the 30 cases (Table 7), the systolic blood pressure was higher than the diastolic blood pressure.

Kruskal-Wallis test

A Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to find out if there existed any differences between the three classroom sizes for math performance. The mean ranks for a classroom of 10 or fewer students were 43.02, 27.80 for 11 to 19 students, and 20.68 for a classroom of 20 or more students (Table 9). The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there were significant differences between the classroom sizes in math performance (Chi-Square (N = 60) = 17.197, p =.001) (Table 10).

Contingency Tables

A 2×2 cross-tabulation was conducted to determine the relationship between education (degree) and life. The actual count of ‘less than high school’ respondents who viewed life as exciting was 52 whereas the expected count for the same was 77.0; high school respondents who viewed life as exciting were an actual count of 221 and an expected count of 226.7. On the other hand, the actual count of ‘junior college or more’ respondents who viewed life as exciting was 162 whereas the expected count was 131.4. There was an actual count of 95 for respondents who had ‘less than a high school education and viewed life as a routine with an expected count of 79.1. For ‘high school students’, there was an actual count of 242 who viewed life as a routine with an expected count of 232.9. There was an actual count of 110 for respondents who viewed life as a routine and had a junior college education or more whereas the expected count for the same was 135.0. Finally, the actual count of high school respondents who viewed life as dull was 17 while the expected count was 8.0. For high school students, the actual count of those who viewed life as dull was 20 with an expected count of 23.4. The actual count of respondents with at least a junior college education and who viewed life as dull were 8 and the expected count was 13.6 (Table 11).

The Pearson Chi-Square value for this analysis was 36.630, 2-tailed significance p =.001 at 4 degrees of freedom (Table 12). This value was significant and it was large enough to indicate that the null hypothesis is rejected as there are large differences between actual and expected counts for a degree (education) and perception of life. In other words, the two variables (education and perception of life) are not independent. The largest number of respondents who viewed life as exciting had at least a junior college education while a majority of those who viewed life as dull had a high school education (Figure 1).

References

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS, Third edition. San Diego, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

Hebel, A. (2002). Statistics-when to use them and which is more powerful? Lecture Notes. Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore.

Appendix

Table 1: Ranks for Creativity Pre- and Post-test Scores.

Ranks
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Creativity post-test – Creativity pre-test Negative Ranks 9a 15.67 141.00
Positive Ranks 28b 20.07 562.00
Ties 3c
Total 40
a. Creativity post-test < Creativity pre-test
b. Creativity post-test > Creativity pre-test
c. Creativity post-test = Creativity pre-test

Table 2: Wilcoxon’s Test for Creativity Pre- and Post-test Scores.

Test Statisticsb
Creativity post-test – Creativity pre-test
Z -3.179a
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .001
a. Based on negative ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Table 3: Ranks for Pre- and Post-Test Score.

Ranks
pre-test and post-test group N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
creativity test score Pre-test scores 40 36.22 1449.00
Post-test scores 40 44.78 1791.00
Total 80

Table 4: Mann Whitney U Test for Creativity Test Scores.

Test Statisticsa
creativity test score
Mann-Whitney U 629.000
Wilcoxon W 1449.000
Z -1.647
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .100
a. Grouping Variable: pre-test and post-test group

Table 5: Ranks for Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures.

Ranks
Mean Rank
Setting 1.00
Systolic Blood Pressure 3.00
Diastolic Blood Pressure 2.00

Table 6: Friedman Test for Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures.

Test Statisticsa
N 30
Chi-Square 60.000
df 2
Asymp. Sig. .000
a. Friedman Test

Table 7: Follow up Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test for Blood Pressures.

Ranks
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Diastolic Blood Pressure – Systolic Blood Pressure Negative Ranks 30a 15.50 465.00
Positive Ranks 0b .00 .00
Ties 0c
Total 30
a. Diastolic Blood Pressure < Systolic Blood Pressure
b. Diastolic Blood Pressure > Systolic Blood Pressure
c. Diastolic Blood Pressure = Systolic Blood Pressure

Table 8: Follow up Wilcoxon’s test for Blood Pressures.

Test Statisticsb
Diastolic Blood Pressure – Systolic Blood Pressure
Z -4.784a
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000
a. Based on positive ranks.
b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

Table 9: Mean Ranks and Number of Students.

Ranks
Classroom size N Mean Rank
Math_Score 10 or less 20 43.02
11-19 20 27.80
20 or more 20 20.68
Total 60

Table 10: Kruskal-Willis Test with Chi-Square Value.

Test Statisticsa,b
Math_Score
Chi-Square 17.197
df 2
Asymp. Sig. .000
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Classroom size

Table 11: A Cross-Tabulation (2×2 Contingency Table) of Degree and Life Expectations.

Degree * IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL Crosstabulation
IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL Total
EXCITING ROUTINE DULL
Degree Less than high school Count 52 95 17 164
Expected Count 77.0 79.1 8.0 164.0
% within Degree 31.7% 57.9% 10.4% 100.0%
% within IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL 12.0% 21.3% 37.8% 17.7%
High school Count 221 242 20 483
Expected Count 226.7 232.9 23.4 483.0
% within Degree 45.8% 50.1% 4.1% 100.0%
% within IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL 50.8% 54.1% 44.4% 52.1%
Junior college or more Count 162 110 8 280
Expected Count 131.4 135.0 13.6 280.0
% within Degree 57.9% 39.3% 2.9% 100.0%
% within IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL 37.2% 24.6% 17.8% 30.2%
Total Count 435 447 45 927
Expected Count 435.0 447.0 45.0 927.0
% within Degree 46.9% 48.2% 4.9% 100.0%
% within IS LIFE EXCITING OR DULL 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Table 12: Chi-Square Test for Degree and Life.

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 36.630a 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 35.186 4 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 33.630 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 927
a. 0 cells (.0%) have an expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.96.
A clustered bar chart showing the relationship between education (degree) and perception of life.
Figure 1: A clustered bar chart showing the relationship between education (degree) and perception of life.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, April 5). NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting. https://studycorgi.com/nonparametric-tests-in-parametric-setting/

Work Cited

"NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting." StudyCorgi, 5 Apr. 2022, studycorgi.com/nonparametric-tests-in-parametric-setting/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting'. 5 April.

1. StudyCorgi. "NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting." April 5, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nonparametric-tests-in-parametric-setting/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting." April 5, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nonparametric-tests-in-parametric-setting/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting." April 5, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/nonparametric-tests-in-parametric-setting/.

This paper, “NonParametric Tests in Parametric Setting”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.