Summary
In recent years, the topic of the relationship between an individual’s characteristics and their attitude toward their health has become particularly relevant and popular among researchers in the field of health and psychology. For example, in developing strategies and measures to improve human health indicators, this information can be crucial, as everyone can make different decisions from others. The scientific sources presented in this essay examine the relationship between character traits and human behavior related to health. Each source is a compilation of valuable information derived from qualitative research on how confidence, sociability, and resilience influence a person’s relationship with health.
Hampson, S. E., Edmonds, G. W., Barckley, M., Goldberg, L. R., Dubanoski, J. P., & Hillier, T. A. (2016). A Big Five approach to self-regulation: personality traits and health trajectories in the Hawaii longitudinal study of personality and health. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 21(2), 152–162.
The first source for consideration is Joyner, Rhodes, and Loprinzi (2018), who conducted a study titled “The Prospective Association Between the Five Factor Personality Model With Health Behaviors and Health Behavior Clusters.” The work focuses on the relationship between health behavior and the five-factor model of personality. To begin the analysis of this article, it is necessary to ensure a precise understanding of what the concept of the five-factor model means.
This model comprises five essential elements that define human personality traits, including extraversion, neuroticism, benevolence, openness to communication, and honesty. The authors of the study used a large sample of participants, from whom they analyzed the relationship between personality traits and behaviors that contribute to maintaining their health. According to the study, honesty and extraversion are features that contribute to human health indicators (Joyner et al., 2018). In turn, this characteristic of neuroticism is, on the contrary, a significant indicator of unhealthy behavior in life.
It is essential to mention that this work also has its limitations. For example, the study is primarily based on data that the authors designed to be produced directly by the participants in the experiment. In this context, it is important to consider the potential for bias in the responses and the lack of an objective assessment of judgment. It would also be necessary to study the mechanisms of the interrelationship between the subjects learned in greater depth, and to extend the period of observation for participants to be longer and more detailed.
However, the results of the research presented in the journal article refer to my planned research. I can recognize the relationship between extraversion and behavior that strengthens a person’s health, which can help me in my professional activities. With these findings, I can take steps that aim to improve the health of my potential patients in the future.
Joyner, C., Rhodes, R. E., & Loprinzi, P. D. (2018). The prospective association between the Five Factor personality model with health behaviors and health behavior clusters. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 880–896.
The next source of analysis is a study by Hampson et al. (2016), which conducted a longitudinal study titled “A Big Five approach to self-regulation: personality traits and health trajectories in the Hawaii longitudinal of personality and health study.” The study also examines the relationship between the five main personality traits mentioned in the previous analysis and the health trajectory. Emphasis is also placed on how this health trajectory can change over time.
An interesting fact is that the studies presented in this article lasted more than 20 years. A considerable amount of time has passed since the authors attempted to comprehensively analyze the various features of the person and to establish the most comprehensive evidence base for their relationship with human health. Thus, according to the study, neuroticism is associated with a less favorable health trajectory for humans, whereas good faith, on the contrary, is more optimal (Hampson et al., 2016). This suggests that positive emotions from life are more likely to indicate good health outcomes.
On the negative side, a noticeable gap in the study is that it does not disclose results to the general population. For example, the work focuses on a specific cohort in Hawaiian longitudinal research, as well as insufficiently revealing potential constraints that affect the accuracy of the study. Authors could focus more on the interrelationship between the cultural, social, and economic components of society and their influence on the development of personal human qualities.
However, this study aligns with the goals of my work, as the results presented by the authors enable me to better understand the indicators that affect the trajectory of human health. Thanks to this knowledge, I will gain a deeper understanding of the psychology of human behavior in relation to health, which will demonstrate my competence and professionalism in my profession.
Tavares, R. de C. A., Mahadeshwar, G., Wan, H., Huston, N. C., & Pyle, A. M. (2021). The global and local distribution of RNA structure throughout the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Journal of Virology, 95(5).
The third resource for research is the work by Tavares et al. (2021) titled “The Global and local distribution of RNA Structure the SARS-CoV-2 Genome”. In this paper, the authors do not directly address the personal characteristics of an individual, but this study extends beyond the understanding of personality features and explores the relationship between other factors in the human body. This article draws an analogy between a person’s genetic predisposition to disease and their ability to make informed decisions about their health based on these predispositions (Tavares et al., 2021). In particular, the example is a coronavirus that is complex in its RNA structure and can affect the human genome in various ways.
The limitation of this work is that the information it contains is more closely related to the genetic component of human health. The author does not explicitly highlight the characteristics of the person and their impact on decision-making. The authors could have provided more detail on the relationship between human personality and health indicators. The results of this work are relevant to me because, although they do not serve the specific research purposes I need, they allow for the drawing of similarities between seemingly unrelated topics. In my work, it’s essential to consider the human health situation from all angles, which also requires examining the genetic component of health.