Risk of Fall Evaluation

Problem or Hypothesis

There is a rising alarm that the quality of care requires being enhanced and assessed methodically in health institutions across the globe. As Cruz, Carvalho, Lamas, and Barbosa (2014) affirm in the article, the excellence of monitoring is anchored in the pointers that determine the function of the constituents of formation, process, and result while judging them against the ideal values. The commonness or rareness of falls in a health institution denotes a care determinant, and the possibility of falling is a treatment aspect determined via the use of scales (de Abreu & Marrow, 2013). The extents of measure are fundamental in the evaluation of the likelihood of falling since it assists in the making of judgments, allows the fitness of interventions to every patient, and aids care development and the sharing of information amid medical personnel. Though there is no clear statement of the problem in the article, an understanding of the introduction section expresses the problem, which is tested through the application of six hypotheses.

The Kind of Study

Nurses require continuous professional backing to attain improved results. In this regard, Cruz et al. (2014) chose to conduct a descriptive, exploratory quantitative study that sought to respond to this question: Which factors ought to be encompassed in a medical supervision pattern in nursing in an attempt to enhance the safety and quality of care associated with the likelihood of fall?

The Sample Size and the Population of the Sample

The population of the study was made of all the patients in the chosen department at Médio Ave Hospital Centre, which is in Portugal, and that had been admitted between February and April 2012 (Cruz et al., 2014). The sample size was a convenience sample of one hundred and thirty-two patients who met the set inclusion determinants. The one hundred and thirty-two participants had an average age of 72.5 years and a standard deviation of thirteen years. The youngest selected patient was aged 25 years while the oldest was aged 97 years. Though there were more male participants (79) when judged against the female participants (53), the sample was evenly representative of both sexes. Moreover, the sample size was large enough to carry out the study effectively.

The Result of the Study

In the course of the observation of the patients, the researchers evaluated the likelihood of fall and the outcomes were that 22 patients expressed no likelihood of fall, 64 patients had law likelihood of fall, and 46 of the patients had a high likelihood of fall (Cruz et al., 2014). The study employed appropriate statistical analysis to determine the significance of the relationships involving the variables.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

The article is applicable in medical practice as it offers critical recommendations for the improvement of quality of care and the safety of patients. The recommendations given in the article encompass supervision sessions to respond to specific requirements of every nurse, support and formulate their vital deliberations, expression, flexibility, and compliance. Another recommendation is a group medical supervision to ensure that the entire nursing personnel present inquiries, share knowledge, and evaluate medical instances. Because the enhancement of the quality of care is the greatest medical factor, fall prevention requires being explored and paid attention to, especially for older patients (Koivu, Hyrkas, & Saarinen, 2011). Regardless of its relevance to clinical practice, the article is mainly applicable for older patients and nearly inappropriate for youthful patients.

References

Cruz, S., Carvalho, L., Lamas, B., & Barbosa, P. (2014). Improving quality in the patients’ risk of fall evaluation through clinical supervision. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(6), 526-530.

de Abreu, W., & Marrow, C. (2013). Clinical supervision in nursing practice: A comparative study in Portugal and the United Kingdom. SANARE, 11(2), 16-24.

Koivu, A., Hyrkas, K., & Saarinen, P. I. (2011). Who attends clinical supervision? The uptake of clinical supervision by hospital nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 69-79.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, May 2). Risk of Fall Evaluation. https://studycorgi.com/risk-of-fall-evaluation/

Work Cited

"Risk of Fall Evaluation." StudyCorgi, 2 May 2022, studycorgi.com/risk-of-fall-evaluation/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Risk of Fall Evaluation'. 2 May.

1. StudyCorgi. "Risk of Fall Evaluation." May 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/risk-of-fall-evaluation/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Risk of Fall Evaluation." May 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/risk-of-fall-evaluation/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Risk of Fall Evaluation." May 2, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/risk-of-fall-evaluation/.

This paper, “Risk of Fall Evaluation”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.